Sentences with phrase «knowledge of the cases in»

Not exact matches

«So when Trump says he wants to «open up» libel law, he really means (if he has the slightest knowledge of the law) that he wants to open up — to change — the First Amendment, which, beginning in 1964, has been held to require in cases brought by public figures, proof that what was said was false, and that the newspaper knew or suspected that it was false.

Even in the cases of Siri, Amazon's Alexa, or IBM's Watson, systems that possess huge swaths of knowledge are actually fairly limited.

It was opened partly in response to a n examination by The New York Times of condominiums at the Time Warner Center in Manhattan whose ownership is hidden behind shell companies, according to the people with knowledge of the case.

Investigating judges suspect that managers of Bollore SA used advertising company Havas to facilitate the election of Alpha Conde in Guinea and Faure Gnassingbe in Togo nearly a decade ago by providing communications advice at a discount price, according to a person with knowledge of the case.

In the case of Hruby, the murderous teen from Oklahoma, a little bit of knowledge proved disastrous.

They tout special knowledge about cannabis regulation or, in the case of the janitors, expertise in odor containment.

It's this building block of trust, in Jobs» case, that crystallized his relationships with his knowledge workers that helped launch the Apple products we can't live without today.

«This case has already been won in arbitration, and there was no knowledge of any payments from the president, and he has denied all these allegations.»

The EU has invested five million euros to set up a centre that provides knowledge (in - depth sector market reports, guidelines, and case studies); tailored export advice extending to legal and regulatory requirements; rules on market access and competitor and market analysis; assistance with due diligence; training programs adapted for the needs of individual companies; and hot - desks and work spaces in China.

Invented at Harvard, the case method approach assumes that knowledge is gained when students actively participate in a discussion of a situation that may be faced by decision makers.

March 7, 2018: White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders falsely claimed that the «case had been won already in arbitration,» and reiterated, «there was no knowledge of any payments from the president, and he has denied all these allegations.»

Analyzing a case in the classroom removed from the realities of chaos and conflicting customer responses adds little to an entrepreneur's knowledge.

The actual analytical changes imposed by the suggested unitary standard and its knowledge requirement would arise in intentional discrimination cases involving customer preferences and BFOQ claims that were not blatantly discriminatory when addressing concerns of privacy, safety, or authenticity.

Many of your clients will probably be happy to be featured in a case study, as long as you make them look good and avoid giving away anything they don't want to be public knowledge.

In the case of knowledge workers, Sodexo's study found the following:

As our knowledge of what is «real» changes, so does our science... our understanding of science is reactionary, so in many cases «FACT» should really be interpreted as «factual until proven otherwise.»

In the ideal case, once a single human acquires a bit of knowledge about the world, he or she can transmit it to all other humans via language, so nobody else has to independently make that same discovery.

She added that she had heard Saturday from sources in Saudi Arabia with knowledge of the case that the beheading had not been carried out Friday, as originally planned.

She said she heard from a source in Saudi Arabia with knowledge of the case and the proceedings that Saudi authorities «will carry out the execution.»

In some cases this appeal to inner intuition might take the form of the claim that each of us has a «non-sensuous experience of the self» which is «both prior to our interpretation of our sense - knowledge and more important as source for the more fundamental questions of the meaning of our human experience as human selves» (BRO 75).

Rogers supports his first contention by exemplifying his suggested way of reading and by choosing a particularly knotty case» interpreting Thomas on the natural knowledge of God by reading the first question in the Summa Theologica from Thomas» exegesis of Romans 1, instead of the other way around.

But consciousness is as distinct from knowledge as causal efficacy is from presentational immediacy; in each case, it is the former which is the ground of tie latter.

In all these cases the necessary skill and knowledge are tested and the reward is granted or not, according to the results of the test.

But it may be that the maximal case on the closed dimensions would suffice to furnish the standard for the open ones, that, e.g., perfection of knowledge and goodness is in some sense the «measure» of degrees of happiness, even though the latter can not be absolutely but only relatively perfect (R but not A).

The Hebrew word for «know» in this case, yadha, usually means «have thorough knowledge of.»

The single case of absolute knowledge that the tradition sought is found only in the case of absolute relativity.

In any case, McCabe was absolutely vehement in insisting that nescience is not the result of some defect in God's knowledge or power; it is a voluntary self - limitation (FG 205In any case, McCabe was absolutely vehement in insisting that nescience is not the result of some defect in God's knowledge or power; it is a voluntary self - limitation (FG 205in insisting that nescience is not the result of some defect in God's knowledge or power; it is a voluntary self - limitation (FG 205in God's knowledge or power; it is a voluntary self - limitation (FG 205).

But God's knowledge is different:»... it is precisely the ideal case of knowledge, knowledge absolute in certainty and complete adequacy to the known, that must in some other aspects be literally and unrestrictedly relative» (DR 9).

There he gives a fairly unsatisfactory account of how a strict empiricist may slowly build a reliable case that both reason and value given in experience point beyond our experience, and lead us through three stages of knowledge - other selves are known first, then nature, and finally the personal God.

It is somewhat interesting to know what others of some fame believe (or in this case, do not believe), but for all those, great and not so great, that are now dead, their knowledge and understanding is infinitely more than when they breathed for existence.

In the celebrated case New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court held «the First Amendment protects the publication of all statements, even false ones, about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with actual malice (with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity).&raquIn the celebrated case New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court held «the First Amendment protects the publication of all statements, even false ones, about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with actual malice (with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity).&raquin reckless disregard of their truth or falsity).»

If our families of origin invoke pain and suffering in our hearts (our experience of the flesh, as Paul would say), we can be comforted by the knowledge that we are adopted into another family — literally, as is the case for the Robertses, or spiritually and ultimately, for everyone who becomes a Christian and is redeemed by God in Christ.

In the life of spirit, on the other hand, there is no stopping [Stilstand](nor in reality is there any condition [Tilstand], everything is actuality): in case then a man the very same second he has known what is right does not do it — well then, first of all, the knowledge stops boilinIn the life of spirit, on the other hand, there is no stopping [Stilstand](nor in reality is there any condition [Tilstand], everything is actuality): in case then a man the very same second he has known what is right does not do it — well then, first of all, the knowledge stops boilinin reality is there any condition [Tilstand], everything is actuality): in case then a man the very same second he has known what is right does not do it — well then, first of all, the knowledge stops boilinin case then a man the very same second he has known what is right does not do it — well then, first of all, the knowledge stops boiling.

In any case the Christian theologian has had to recognize that such knowledge as he may have inherited is no more absolute or final than that of the scientist.

One can, therefore, make a strong case that in the New Testament knowledge of God as the Holy Spirit is always knowledge after Christ, that is, we know who God is through his Son.

In his essay «A New Humanism for Europe: The Role of the Universities», to which Franchi and Davis refer, Benedict XVI puts it like this: «How urgent is the need to rediscover the unity of knowledge and to counter the tendency to fragmentation and lack of communicability that is all too often the case in our schools!&raquIn his essay «A New Humanism for Europe: The Role of the Universities», to which Franchi and Davis refer, Benedict XVI puts it like this: «How urgent is the need to rediscover the unity of knowledge and to counter the tendency to fragmentation and lack of communicability that is all too often the case in our schools!&raquin our schools!»

If this aspect differed in kind in the case of Jesus from every other member of the species man, then in the present state of our knowledge it would seem impossible rightly to describe Jesus as a man.17 It may be the case that most Christians (and most Christian theologians) in most centuries have accepted this claim: but most have not shared either our modern sensitivity to the difference between history and mythology or our concern for the principles of logic.

That was obviously not the case for Jesus Himself, who though He never sinned, still had to go through the human experience of growing in knowledge and obedience (Luke 2:52, Heb.

It is true knowledge about reality (in this case ultimate reality), given to us through the trustworthy testimony of others.

In either case, the arrival of man — as distinguished from merely his carcass — necessarily involved a creative act and a power outside the realm of material nature where scientific knowledge is sovereign.

In that case science must provide answers, but to do this, it must invoke scientism, a philosophical doctrine which asserts arbitrarily that knowledge comes only through the methods of investigation available to the natural sciences.

The particular subject - matter of knowledge is supplied by experience in each case and is the norm and limit of cognition.

The attempt might even be made positively to recommend this fixing of a terminological starting - point, by recalling that for Christian scholastic philosophy, too, in contrast to Platonic and Idealist philosophy, what first meets man's cognition and what he therefore rightly takes as the starting - point and model case of possible objects of his knowledge, is what is experienced by the senses and to that extent material.

Knowledge in this case pertains not only to the knowledge of the object but also to knowledge of Knowledge in this case pertains not only to the knowledge of the object but also to knowledge of knowledge of the object but also to knowledge of knowledge of the self.

Where positivist reason dominates the field to the exclusion of all else - and that is broadly the case in our public mindset - then the classical sources of knowledge for ethics and law are excluded.

In one case one must be omniscient in order to make their claim (I know that there can not be a god because I know every possibility) while the other makes it clear that they are not arrogant enough to claim knowledge of absolutely everything possiblIn one case one must be omniscient in order to make their claim (I know that there can not be a god because I know every possibility) while the other makes it clear that they are not arrogant enough to claim knowledge of absolutely everything possiblin order to make their claim (I know that there can not be a god because I know every possibility) while the other makes it clear that they are not arrogant enough to claim knowledge of absolutely everything possible.

One may recognize that if Jesus of Nazareth had not been known and remembered in the company of his disciples, there could have been no knowledge of the resurrection, since in that case there would have been no one to receive that knowledge; but it is also true that without the knowledge of the resurrection the company of his disciples could never have become the Christian church.

Although in this case I will say, you might have a lot of knowledge, but as a Pastor, your compassion is lacking.

Furthermore, according to Hartshorne, the relationships involved in human knowledge by means of perception are analogous to those obtaining in cases of volition.

In his case there was no body of accepted knowledge of the seen world to confine and actually hamper the processes of his imagination by impressing upon him what was really possible.