Sentences with phrase «knowledge of the fact in»

The historical problem presented by the Gospels is, then, not the problem of determining whether the character of the early Christians, their faith, and the exigencies of their life and work have colored and overlaid the facts of Jesus» teaching and life, but is, rather, the problem of determining just how we should use our knowledge of this fact in our efforts to get back to the so - called historical Jesus» own words and life.

In my opinion, Carvin's representation was only passable when he was tub thumping about the First Amendment in a context that did not require knowledge of the facts in this case.

Since you are the person who has personal knowledge of the facts in your case, you and I must work together to maximize your chances of getting the most favorable result for you and so as expeditiously as possible.

«Knowingly,» «knowledge,» «known,» and «knows» mean actual knowledge of the fact in question.

Not exact matches

«The fact that a person may be employed as a computer programmer and may use information technology skills and knowledge to help an enterprise achieve its goals in the course of his or her job is not sufficient to establish the position as a specialty occupation.»

He did it in his recent Tesla master plan, referring to the low chance of success he knew he had when starting Tesla by citing the fact that Ford is the only U.S. car company to have avoided bankruptcy — knowledge he didn't have when he launched Tesla in 2003, six years before GM and Chrysler filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Finding those with knowledge of the facts and issues surrounding child trafficking and coupling them with people who have a fiery passion for ending the injustice has allowed Love146 to grow their presence in both the US and the UK.

The authors of the study, in fact, understood this years ago — noting that at «knowledge of people's personalities can also be used to manipulate and influence them.»

In fact, you need only two things to create a killer online course: knowledge of a topic that others are buzzing about and a distribution platform.

In fact, if nothing else, you could say that the story of Andy Grove — a busboy who fled a life lived under Fascists, Nazis, and Communists to get an education at an institution free to all, including refugees, then taking that knowledge and using it to help invent an entire industry — illustrates exactly what makes America great.

In fact, the surge in craft beer sales — industry sales have more than doubled to $ 12 billion in the past five years — is what's driving the professionalization of beer knowledgIn fact, the surge in craft beer sales — industry sales have more than doubled to $ 12 billion in the past five years — is what's driving the professionalization of beer knowledgin craft beer sales — industry sales have more than doubled to $ 12 billion in the past five years — is what's driving the professionalization of beer knowledgin the past five years — is what's driving the professionalization of beer knowledge.

Zero knowledge proofs are a scientific breakthrough in the field of cryptography: they allow you to prove knowledge of some facts about hidden information without revealing that information.

«Because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that Sulyma had actual knowledge of the facts comprising claims I and III, as well as knowledge of the disclosures he alleges were unlawfully inadequate in claims II and IV, the Court grants defendants» motion for summary judgment on those claims, finding them time - barred,» Cousins wrote in his opinion.

The public isn't allowed to know what is specified in the full text of the TPP, which means that public knowledge of the agreement is limited — and according to one poll, most Canadians aren't even aware the agreement exists, despite the fact that one of the many rounds of negotiations was held in Canada -LSB-...]

The public isn't allowed to know what is specified in the full text of the TPP, which means that public knowledge of the agreement is limited — and according to one poll, most Canadians aren't even aware the agreement exists, despite the fact that one of the many rounds of negotiations was held in Canada during an unpublicized Ottawa meeting from July 3 to 12, 2014.

According to the report in Reuters citing people with direct knowledge of the probes, the sanctions are stemming from the fact that Wells Fargo profited from an insurance program that impacted more than a half a million people.

As our knowledge of what is «real» changes, so does our science... our understanding of science is reactionary, so in many cases «FACT» should really be interpreted as «factual until proven otherwise.»

Either the vast majority of scientific knowledge that has worked developing modern medicine and technology is on a wrong foundation (that makes the success of medicine and technology virtually impossible), or the bible is wrong in some of it's facts.

The cafeteria Christians (like Mark9988), who pick and choose which sections and versions of the Bible to subscribe to, will come out of the woodwork and call you «ignorant» when, in fact, you're the one displaying quite a bit of knowledge about the Bible.

But if this is used to invalidate all claims to discern the truth, it is in fact an arrogant claim with the kind of knowledge which is superior that you have just said, no religion has.»

In regards to your comment «the fact that you even know about Euhemerus is a product of Christian learning and appreciation of alternate views», we should, indeed, be thankful for early Christian monks who helped preserve the knowledge of prior centuries, but perhaps you are unaware of the contribution of Greek civilization to Western culture and the «Age of Enlightenment» in late 17th century Europe with figures such as Denis Diderot, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Voltaire, Baruch Spinoza, etcIn regards to your comment «the fact that you even know about Euhemerus is a product of Christian learning and appreciation of alternate views», we should, indeed, be thankful for early Christian monks who helped preserve the knowledge of prior centuries, but perhaps you are unaware of the contribution of Greek civilization to Western culture and the «Age of Enlightenment» in late 17th century Europe with figures such as Denis Diderot, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Voltaire, Baruch Spinoza, etcin late 17th century Europe with figures such as Denis Diderot, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Voltaire, Baruch Spinoza, etc..

All disciplines must finally make one coherent body of knowledge or lose hold of their matter; and any knowledge of this coherence is in fact knowledge of God - that is, knowledge of what theology is supposed to know.

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

But I think it's appropriate for contemporary usage to put «knowledge» at the bottom, since our culture tends to see that concept merely as being in possession of a fact.

In fact, dogmatic theology can make us more resistent to Grace, «knowledge, when it is not transformed by love, «puffs up», feeds instead of challenging the narcissistic ego.

To recite areas of research in which an author is ignorant is surely no worse, perhaps less so, than to charge an author with knowledge of which she pretends but in fact does not possess.

Our knowledge of the natural world, I would argue, has in fact increased our tolerance and peace.

If not for the facts that we live in a common culture and histories I would see religious knowledge as a complete waste of time.

The fact that he is willing to be part of this conversation with the knowledge that his understanding of scripture is in the minority is noted; regardless of the fact that he is probably in the majority in his pews.

In fact, there have been a large number of scientists throughout history who have made major scientific discoveries that have shaped so much of our knowledge, and they worked out of desire to learn the truth about the origin and nature of God's creation.

In fact, we might even find an implicit anticipation of God's knowledge of temporal actuality in the 1922 essay on «Uniformity and Contingency» (ESP 134fIn fact, we might even find an implicit anticipation of God's knowledge of temporal actuality in the 1922 essay on «Uniformity and Contingency» (ESP 134fin the 1922 essay on «Uniformity and Contingency» (ESP 134f).

The fact of the matter is that you can not defend the myth in light of the real scientific knowledge we have today.

In the final chapter of Personal Knowledge, The Rise of Man, Polanyi tells us that, «We must face the fact that life has actually arisen from inanimate matter, and that human beings... have evolved from the parental zygote in which each of us had his individual origins.&raquIn the final chapter of Personal Knowledge, The Rise of Man, Polanyi tells us that, «We must face the fact that life has actually arisen from inanimate matter, and that human beings... have evolved from the parental zygote in which each of us had his individual origins.&raquin which each of us had his individual origins.»

Most importantly, though, is the fact that his shift in the second sentence betrays a knowledge on his part that there is some amount of damaging information which is rising dangerously close to the surface, hence his refusal to offer details despite taking the trouble to appear on this thread.

to Jake, in every era or times in the past, humans have different perception of reality, because our knowledge improves or changes toward sophistication, For example during the times of Jesus, there was no science yet as what we have today, since the religion in the past corresponds to their needs, it is true for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today, like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays knowledge.The creation or our origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesis,.

Fact is that you are free to believe whatever you want, it doesn't really help for you to even try to understand the simple elegant FACT of evolution, besides you lack the skills, knowledge, education, and understanding to contribute to fixing the problems that humankind will have to fix in order to survFact is that you are free to believe whatever you want, it doesn't really help for you to even try to understand the simple elegant FACT of evolution, besides you lack the skills, knowledge, education, and understanding to contribute to fixing the problems that humankind will have to fix in order to survFACT of evolution, besides you lack the skills, knowledge, education, and understanding to contribute to fixing the problems that humankind will have to fix in order to survive.

In fact, the uncertainty about Jesus is that which pertains to all our knowledge of the past.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

But that this should be interpreted as freedom from religion, and used as a means of sealing our culture against the imparting of religious knowledge, has no justification in fact.

All this is to show that Thomas does in fact see the process of acquiring knowledge as «context relative».

In its place he must put the vital, living knowledge that «the fundamental fact of human existence is man with man.»

Is God's Final Judgment one of «eternal» hell for mankind who didn't repent while here on earth... despite the fact that Jesus said, «It is finished»... and Jesus «wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth»... and Jesus is «our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe.»

It is a sheer fact, undisputed by any who have knowledge of what transpired in early Christian history, that the Christian Church developed its patterns of thought, its theology, through the constant interaction of the biblical witness and the «non-biblical» environment in which the primitive Christian community found itself.

So much for Gopnik's argument that Chesterton's «national spirit» and «extreme localism» led him to his supposed anti-Semitism: they were, in fact, precisely what gave him his respect for other nations and other cultures, including that of the Jews, to which the world owed its knowledge of God, «as narrow as the universe».

In fact some churches do a good job of enhancing their understanding of ancient wisdom with modern knowledge.

It is easy to see, though it scarcely needs to be pointed out, since it is involved in the fact that the Reason is set aside, that Faith is not a form of knowledge; for all knowledge is either a knowledge of the Eternal, excluding the temporal and historical as indifferent, or it is pure historical knowledge.

Religious people speak of God when human knowledge (perhaps simply because they are too lazy to think) come to an end, or when human resources fall — in fact it is always the deus ex machina that they bring on to the scene, either for the apparent solution of insoluble problems, or as strength in human failure — always, that is to say, exploiting human weakness or human boundaries.11

if anything belief would lead one to question and find facts to support their claim or find that their claim is not supported by anything but the belief in it and then lead one from belief to knowledge of.

The sum of the treasures of knowledge and culture has increased to such a degree that the individual in the time available in one lifetime can no longer have any direct contact with the whole of the benefits of civilization available nowadays and which are in fact known and enjoyed by one person or another.

everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.