If you believe the warming is natural, first please explain why the increases in CO2 isn't having the effect
our knowledge of physics tells us it will have.
Not exact matches
Calling my
knowledge of jewish history «abysmal» is like you
telling stephen hawking's
knowledge of physics is abysmal and should really bone up on his bible to understand it.
Technical introductions to advanced nanotechnology have emphasized theoretical studies
of what our current
knowledge of physics and chemistry
tells us about the kinds
of systems we will eventually be able to build as our ability to control the structure
of matter at the nanometer scale increases.
Constructed in a 16 - bit world with an obvious reverent reference to older side - scrolling, platform - jumping games such as Metroid, Axiom Verge
tells the story
of a scientist who dies in an experiment gone awry, only to reawaken in an alien world with no
knowledge of where he is, how he got there, and why the laws
of physics do not seem to apply.
As a professional scientist, a physicist with 40 years experience in aerospace and extensive
knowledge of atmospheric
physics, I can
tell you that, indeed, the science is settled, but not the way the AGW extremists would have you believe.
I try to imagine what the reaction would be if physicists in another (non-climate) area — say, quantum computing — were to hold a conference, and physicists from yet another area — let's say, high - energy nuclear
physics — were to show up at their conferences and
tell them, without having read up carefully on quantum computing, and lacking the
knowledge to make substantive criticisms
of the mainstream views in that field (beyond, perhaps, superficial ones that had already been exhaustively addressed and refuted in the quantum computing literature), that they had it all wrong.