So yes, the first problem with the article was the word «smart» to describe general
knowledge of world religions.
Critical
knowledge of world religion and church history, thorough study of theology and the Bible, and, finally, rigorous thinking are minimal but essential means to keep a church alive and therefore respected.
Not exact matches
For instance, while Star Wars has very evident religious Buddhist and Taoist overtones, Star Trek shows
religion from a cold perspective (e.g., science is supreme and only cultures and
worlds without an in - depth
knowledge of science need
religion).
as time goes on and more facts are acquired, one has to make an ever greater leap to jump from the
world of knowledge into the
world of religion.
It is also far easier to slip from
religion into the
world of knowledge.
The
religions of today are more sophisticated, more carefully constructed in such a way that they have managed to survive the increased
knowledge we have
of the
world, but they are just as much fairytales as the stories
of Thor or Zeus, and with no more evidence to support them.
It is common factual
knowledge that christianity has done significantly more than Islam or any other
world religion (this is not a knock on other
religions) in terms
of humanitarian giving.
The quotation captures the noble project
of the book in this way: «The old Catholic
religion - culture
of Europe is dead... the inheritance
of classical culture... has been destroyed, overwhelmed by a vast influx
of new
knowledge, by the scientific mass civilisation
of the modern
world.
Some
of them rival The Da Vinci Code in their passion for conspiracy and the shallowness
of their historical
knowledge, not just
of the New Testament and early Christianity, but
of ancient
religions generally and, even more broadly, the ancient
world.
They find passages concerning the futility
of seeking too much religious
knowledge (5:1 - 6), the absurdity
of constant effort to push oneself to religious asceticism, the value
of not taking
religion too seriously or not praying too much,
of not straining oneself for any earthly goal, and
of not trying to save the
world from all the cruelty and injustice in it (3:16 - 21).
Adam 1, created in the image
of God, does so by conquering the universe, imposing his
knowledge, technology, and cultural institutions upon the
world:
religion affirms this apparently «secular» mandate.
History has shown that
religion is not healthy for children, the planet, freedom, innocent civilians, people
of other
religions, little boys who trust priests, justice for the poor, education,
knowledge of the
world around us, social health, the arts...
The new manifesto urges humanity to «leave behind the magical thinking and myth - making that are substitutes for tested
knowledge of nature,» notes that
religions «have their origins in pre-urban nomadic and agricultural societies
of the past» and are irrelevant to the «postindustrial global information culture that is emerging,» and calls for a
World Parliament.
What else is
religion for but to fill in gaps — in our
knowledge of how the
world should work, in our justifications for our actions, in our responsibility for things we ought to do something about but don't?
shipwreck73, Jesus warned us (Matthew 23:1 - 39) about who sat in the lead roles in the churches, synagogues, any / all false
religions in the
world... and specifically told us to read and study His truth (the Bible) so that we can sharpen our
knowledge with those that profess to know him whether they are teaching His truth or the lies
of man.
The effort to bring food to the hungry, house to the roofless, work for the unemployed, freedom to captives,
knowledge to the ignorant is a primary call
of all the major
religions of the
world.
It is to be expected that Christianity should be developed anew with greater fullness at this time when the presentation to the
world of the Faith
of Christ has become too meagre precisely on that level
of the relation between
religion and the physical sciences which is the natural meeting place today between revealed and natural
knowledge.
In fact, although the United States is one
of the most religious developed countries in the
world, most Americans scored 50 percent or less on a quiz measuring
knowledge of the Bible,
world religions and what the Constitution says about
religion in public life.
Some abandoned traditional
religion altogether, only to find that scientific
knowledge of the natural
world does not in itself provide answers to the meaning and purpose
of life.
Did such a conglomeration
of abstract terms give really the gist
of our
knowledge of the deity, schools
of theology might indeed continue to flourish, but
religion, vital
religion, would have taken its flight from this
world.
We are talking about christiantiy, and how many humans in the
world, throughout history and still today, have no
knowledge of your preferred
RELIGION, christianity.
There's a torrent
of comments on our story this week about most Americans scoring 50 percent or less on a Pew Forum on
Religion & Public Life quiz measuring
knowledge of the Bible,
world religions and what the Constitution says about
religion.
Your
religion was created by people who did not have
knowledge of the real
world and wanted a safe haven after life because they were scared
of death.
to madtown, Why Jesus was sent in Israel, because that place was part
of the Roman Empire, the center
of the
worlds civilizatoon at that time, in the third century after Him, the Roman emperor, Constantine decreed that christianity was the official
religion of the empire, and soo the teachings
of Jesus inspired the whole empire, now the present Europe and the Middle East has prospered more than anywhere else in the
world, The Americas was not even discovered yet by Columbus, With the prosperity
of the empire was the growth
of scientific
knowledge that leads to what we are now, it happened because its part
of Gods Will, History is its Reflectiom.
Let all
of us believe in our own
religion and gain
knowledge from other
religions that can help us individually become a
world wide people who do not judge each other for our religious beliefs.
The Universe, known and unknown, is possibly not the most used definition
of God, at least in the western
world... but it is the Pantheistic version that jives so much more with science and is not a misappropriation
of the smaller definitions
of God, merely an unfamiliar definition to those with less
knowledge of various more advanced religious and philosophic thought, within and outside those
religions... The idea
of Pantheism also thoughtfully considers why there is, rather than ridiculing, such a wide range
of philosophical and ritual beliefs from a scientific perspective... without having to classify large groups
of people, as senseless idiots from one end or destined for hell from the other.
He analyzes the development
of human consciousness, from its immediate perception
of the here and now, to the stage
of self - consciousness, the understanding that allows man to analyze the
world and order his own actions accordingly.3 Following this is the stage
of reason itself, understanding
of the real, after which spirit, by means
of religions and art, attains the absolute
knowledge, the level at which man recognizes in the
world the stages
of his own reason.
@toad
Religions have served to impede
knowledge, foster fear and dependancy, and are responsible for much
of the war, oppresion and misery that have beset the
world.
Man created stories about gods because he did not understand the
world around him, even the christians believed that the
world was the center
of the universe 400 years ago, but as man gained
knowledge religions had to rethink their dogma to jive with the facts, in order to hold onto the wealth and power they covet more than anything else, period.
The effort to bring food to the hungry, houses to the roofless, work for the unemployed, freedom to captives,
knowledge to the ignorant is a primary call
of all the major
religions of the
world.
Our
knowledge of the
world from 2000 years ago to what we now know about the
world has irrevocably changed the need for
religion.
why don't you start with why humans invented
religion in the first place, the origins
of the books
of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history
of time, fossil evidence
of evolution
of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible,
knowledge of all the gods that humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses
of christianity in the time
of it's origin, the fact that every other
religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part
of the
world you would be a different
religion and going to «hell», and that a good, kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.
Field, the Woodstock Academy teacher who teaches comparative
religions and
world history, said she plans to create a chart showing the similarities among Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, and would like to find speakers with first - hand
knowledge of the Middle East and its
religions.
While drawing certain initial insights from
religion, the program aims to develop a sound scientific basis for
knowledge and strategies that lead to the creation
of a better
world.