Sentences with phrase «known about their formation»

Yet, given what we know about the formation of solar systems and the biology of life, combined with the fact that there are billions of galaxies each containing billions of stars, I find it perfectly plausible that alien life could exist.

Then don't fucking pretend, like you have been, that it matches up perfectly with what we know about the formation of starts and planets!

Calcium Oxalates are well researched in humans, but little is known about their formation in dogs.

Not exact matches

The pace of oil and gas production gains has consistently surprised forecasters since horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, better known as «fracking», were pioneered in U.S. shale rock formations about ten years ago.

All religions have been left in the dustiness sideroads where Truth does prevail upon many of mankind's teachers and their students of Bio-Cellular Technicalities wanting to willingly know about the Kingdom Domains of God which lay upon the insides of all celestially nomenclatured biological life forms and life formations.

Remember guys that Arsene Wenger knows more about football than football knows about football, so stop scrambling your brain with what he should be doing, what formation he should be playing, who he should be signing!

Talking about Manchester United then they have already broken up this formation easily when they beat Chelsea 2 - 0 at Old Trafford so they know how to break down this back 3 formation and if it can be done once then it could be done time and time again....

DeBouchy — enough said... I feel for this player because he was one of the only Wenger players ever that he gave up on because of injury so there must be something we don't know about this situation... strangely enough his skill - set is much better suited for our current formation than Bellerin

I worry about tactics — inability to change formation, or when players don't seem to know their role on the team.

lst season at stamford bridge, was the first time i saw that 4 -1-4-1 formation being used, and for some weird reason i feel a very strange negative vibe and well all know the outcome.the manager has come back with this formation and its not yielding result, but he still sticks with it.i do nt know much about formations dear friends, but if you are playing a slow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTS.

If your CB's are awful in a 4 back system then they'll be exposed as well in a 3 back system no matter what happens.You're just delaying the time for them to get exposed and deceiving yourself.Our problem was not about formation.It was about tactics yet no one saw this and thought 3 -4-3 was our saviour.Look at our starting CB's in 4 back: Koscielny and Mustafi who are all quality.The midfield is the problem.It's not the 3 back or 4 back.In 3 back also our players are not suited for that formation hence I advice Wenger to switch back before it's too late.We need to revert to 4 back and play the right players in the centre.We needed a DM to make our midfield stable but we didn't so we have to make do with what we have.

SEE MORE: How England could line up using Liverpool's highly successful 3 -4-3 formation, with new role for Sterling Six England humiliations: Joe Hart saying he knows nothing about Lithuania may have been unwise No fear!

In days gone by it would have been a pre or post match beer and discussion about the game, now it is a 24 × 7 barrage from informed pundits who rival the AKB supporters with WKB (we know better) having never run a football team yet know better what the tactics or formation should have been, who should have been played, who they clearly would have bought (fcking fantasy football) etc etc..

The tactics of 4 -1-4-1 has led the players astray, meaning they do not know crap about the formation so the run around the place without any direction > The players role in this formation have not been define, what i am basically saying they do not know what is their function (what to do)

When I supported Wenger when he didn't buy Cesc back, didn't know he was about to change formation to 4 -1-4-1 which I find Bizzare since it obviously kills Ozil's abilities.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Now I know lots of people have probably said enough about his impact and the formation he'll fit in so I'll go at it from another angle.

My fellow gunners Wenger is a failure either you admit or not, though this is a preseason match which is less important just to make the players gain fitness, before the competitive matches commence, but at the same time Wenger's tactics and formation should be questioned especially against big teams, he had conceded numerous goals against big teams in which today's match is a reflection of what we are talking about, his old and out dated philosophy is no longer valid in modern football, no wonder Alexis Sanchez can't confide in his plans to propel the team in winning major honours, Wenger still believe in some of the bunch of fringe players he should have gotten rid of in the team and replace them with world class players or players that are hungry for success like Alexis, anyway there is still much time in the transfer window presently to do that, if he can change the hands of time and stop being too stubborn.

I know mertesacker has been very poor and is not probably not the right person to be talking about our form but what he said is right, it's like our players are starting to see some of the flaws in the way we play, our tactics and our formations.

i was not surprised that england lost against iceland, even before the euros started i knew hodgson, s selection will come back to haunt him, he took players that were just back from long injuries not match fit / sharp, also due to media pressure he selected players he shouldn, t have (vardy, rashford) it undermined all the good work done during the qualifications, why on earth just before the tournament would hodgson change tactics, formations, players that served him so well even though it was an easy group they still managed to go unbeaten, i know people laugh when wenger talks about cohesion, continuity....

I don't know about you guys but the moment i saw the lineup for yesterday's match with Ozil, Wilshere and Cazorla starting the game i didn't bother about the formation we were going to use because i knew it was a 4 -1-4-1 formation with Ozil on the wings, Wilshere partnering Flamini and Cazorla in the middle i knew we had lost already but what i failed to do and i'm regreting was to get up from my seat and leave already by seeing the formation / lineup.

In the previous article about formation, where I the players decided to have a meeting and change our style against mancity and Manu at home... some were asking me what about the other games that he won... (NY gunner aka AKB) and some other dude I don't really know here said I am a child..

We should know more about the formation change once this one gets going, and we'll get a clearer picture of Conte's pecking order at centre - half.

JOHN ALECHENU writes about some prominent politicians who participated in the formation of the All Progressives Congress but are no longer part of the party's activities Chief Tom Ikimi This architect and a former Minister of Foreign Affairs during the administration of the late military dictator, Gen. Sani Abacha, was a member of the defunct -LSB-...]

However, very little is known about how the circadian clock regulates this critical part of gene expression to organize the day - night rhythm of protein expression, and if the formation of this looping changes over the day.

It is thought to be the first look at a previously unseen period of the universe — between the release of the microwave background and the formation of the earliest known galaxies, about a billion years later.

According to Eckmann, «The special thing about these processes is that they involve known molecules with very long evolutionary histories, previously receiving attention as suppressors of tumour formation within the context of normal cell division.

Less is known about them, and similar formations, than the ocean floor or even outer space.

The team now want to find out more about the ring, and establish whether the known processes for galaxy formation and large scale structure could have led to its creation, or if astronomers need to radically revise their theories of the evolution of the cosmos.

Despite its relevance, little is known about the precipitation mechanism of calcium carbonate, and specified complex crystal structures challenge the classical view on nucleation considering the formation of metastable ion clusters.

These leftovers from the solar system's formation, known as Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs), hold clues about its origin.

«Based on what we know about star formation in galaxies of different types, we can infer when and how many black holes formed in each galaxy,» Elbert said.

There was an era called white earth which starts about 700 million years ago with alternating periods of deep ice sheets and then hotter warmer stages which led to formation of various kinds of crystals, and last and luckily we live in the period known as green earth, which started about 400 million years ago when multicellular life arose and wholly changed to biochemical breakdown the makeup of the minerals on the planet again.

About 3 million light - years away, an accurately known distance to NGC 206 and thus M31 is critical to the larger understanding of galaxy formation, galaxy evolution, and ultimately the distance scale of the Universe.

I may have missed the opportunity to have my aura photograph taken or to learn about my future from a Sedona fortuneteller, I can certainly understand the sense of magic this spectacular and serene scenery invokes in visitor — although for me, the true magic is not the mist in the crystal ball but knowing a bit about the incredible and distant past these majestic rock formation witnessed.

While memory is a function that has attracted the interest of the scientific community for several years, little is known about the rules underlying memory formation in the brain.

Until recently, little was known about the process that leads to limb formation in vertebrates, from mice to men.

«But before we're ready to conduct a large - scale survey of star - forming and starburst galaxies with the SKA we need to know as much as possible about these galaxies and what triggers their extreme rate of star formation,» he said.

We invited Professor Greg Laughlin, an expert on planet formation and dynamics at the University of California, Santa Cruz, to share an up - to - the - minute picture of what we know about these other worlds, and to explain how the these new discoveries from Mauna Kea help humankind understand how our own solar system formed.

Very little is known about how formation of these complexes is regulated, or the mechanisms through which Oct4 proteins respond to complex extracellular stimuli which regulate pluripotency.

After a great deal of analysis the OGLE team finally concluded that the system must have formed in a similar way to how a star / planet / moon system must form and could serve as a «missing link» between what we know about planet formation and what we hope to learn about moon formation.

«Most of what we know about planet formation today is based on theory.

But before we talk about some of that stuff, the other thing I wanted to ask you about because I know this can promote some abnormal clots formation and something like the blood thickening that we talked about is excess estrogen.

It is persons already known to have problems with kidney stone formation who have been shown to be affected by high protein intake, with about one - third of «stone formers» getting unwanted increases in their urinary oxalate levels in conjunction with a high protein diet.

Besides you don't know whether in formation about someone is true or false.

Being patient while trading with price action goes something like this: you see what looks like a decent pin bar formation but it is going against a rather strong trend, because you know that this setup has a much lower probability of working out than a pin bar setup with a strongly trending market, you sit on your hands and pass it up, don't think anymore about it, even if it works out it does not matter because you just exercised patience, and you will be rewarded for it the more you use it.

Crazy rock formations always seem to make their way onto our agenda, so when I heard about the South Island's version of «Elephant Rocks» I knew we had to make a stop.

Over two metres tall, these enigmatic monarchs take their vitality from the natural dynamism of the rock formations that belies everything you know about the inertia associated with several tons of rough - hewn stone.

Yet, despite its importance and widespread presence, little is known about the origin and formation of microbial DOM.

But as you may know, I am talking about the rising leading edges of AOT plots which relate to early stage cloud formation (i.e. nucleation — presumably via DMS, isoprenes etc emitting by cyanobacterial blooming).