These twelve became
known as His apostles.
Though Paul is
known as the apostle to the gentiles, Peter is the one who initiated the mission to the gentiles.
Not exact matches
the problem is that ppl read the bible thats been translated, if you realy want to
know what was said youll need to study hebrew... every letter has a meaning... every word isnt a perfect fit for english,, theres nuances and cultural differences that youll find,,, its a whole new thing to go back and look at the bible through hebrew eyes,,, they arent required to look like us,,, were supposed to look more like them,,, yashua was a jew,,,, all the
apostles were jews, yashua was sent to the lost sheep of the house of israel, not the gentiles, paul took it to the gentiles, and he never stopped being and living
as a jew, the laws are very viable today, but they do nt give salvation, thats what yashua did...
[130] While not personally an eye - witness of Jesus» ministry, Paul states that he was acquainted with people who had
known Jesus: the
apostle Peter (also
known as Cephas), the
apostle John, and James, the brother of Jesus.
As I looked out over the 180 people taking New Testament interpretation, I saw folk who had never been to church in their lives, and for whom the YDS chapel was their first parish; who certainly did not
know the Nicene Creed and probably not the
Apostles» Creed.
In fact, the
Apostles «advocated this system, not because God had revealed it
as the divine will for Christian homes, but because it was the only stable and respectable system anyone
knew about» at the time, according to Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe of the Women's Bible Commentary.
while the writer has little knowledge of the bible, he is also greatly lacking what he should
know to write such a article, the laws give to people of all walks of life is the commandments given by moses, religion does not have anything to do with goverments laws or rulings, he told us straight the one law that there is no forgiveness for is murder, rulers and goverments take it upon themselves to make the decision whether to go to war, or if a person should be put to death,
as far
as jesus and the
apostles are concerned thier labours was a work of love and true humanitarian towards all peoples, races, religions, they never asked for anything for themselves, and they never took from one to give to another.
By the way, John was the only
apostle who revealed that he could also look into others» hearts
as Jesus did who always
knew what men really thought about all things.
The reason, though offered
as much by faith
as by sight, is that in Jesus Christ,
as the
apostle put it to the Colossians, «all things hold together,» even the well - publicized actions of well -
known figures and the day - to - day activities of ordinary people carried on with never a thought about the scrutiny of history.
It is the Biblical notion that miracles have ceased to be normal... This is not to say that God has stopped performing miracles, or that the Holy Spirit has stopped working, but only that the Apostolic miracles such
as speaking in tongues, prophecy / revelation, and healings have ceased
as a normative gift to individual believers: 1) The Holy Spirit's purpose in imparting the «sign gifts,» has expired 2) The sign gifts were given exclusively to the original Twelve
Apostles, so that the sign gifts and Apostleship are inextricably linked 3) The gift of Apostleship
no longer exists
I
know we're programmed to see the 12
apostles as saints with halos and contemplative faces.
Another major factor is the claim of Orthodoxy to be the Church founded by Christ, led by bishops who were appointed by other bishops who were appointed by others back to the
apostles themselves, a concept
known as Apostolic Succession.
The
apostles redistributed the wealth
as they saw fit
as the believers gave money for the cause of the new cult —
as they felt instructed to do by the greatest authority that they
knew of — God.
Now the
apostles must have
known better, because there's just no way they thought that Jesus, being
as wonderfully contrary
as He tended to be, would say, «Yep, solid point homies, send my people away from me.»
Don't need the Quran to tell us that Jesus or any of his
apostles or prophets is righteous... The bible speaks for itself and then so does the Spirit of Christ
known in these parts
as the Holy Ghost...
Volume I we
know as the Gospel according to Luke, Volume II
as the Acts of the
Apostles.
He answers through modern day prophets and
apostles and through His Holy Spirit
as answers come to my mind and I
know they are true.
And we
know that the
Apostles were not so scrupulous in this respect,
as not to accommodate themselves to the unlearned.
So though we can understand why Mark could come to this curious view (perhaps at the close of a career
as an
apostle that did not have the success he had expected), we must reject it
as a true reflection of Jesus» mind, and
as out of keeping with the other things we
know about his teaching.
'» We have heard that so many times, but the
apostles were astonished that He would encourage them to address God, not even
as an earthly father like Father
Knows Best, but «Papa» and «Daddy.»
Built on a foundation of the
apostles of Jesus Christ, the New Jerusalem will encompass the whole world
as John
knew it — 1,500 miles from one end of the Roman Empire to the other.
When the
apostle Paul found himself at the foot of a pagan altar to an «unknown god» he used it
as an opportunity to proclaim his God — the God that he
knew personally and the God that made Himself knowable in Jesus Christ.
Matthew
knew what John
knew — John did not have a higher evolution of understanding of who Jesus claimed to be than the other
apostles — it is just in the wisdom of God
as He used each writer to convey understanding to the folks who received the letters and for our benefit in the ages to come that Matthew focuses on different things than John.
As we have seen in Chapter 10 we can
no longer recover the actual historical development by which the
apostles came to see the significance of the death of Jesus.
He has an awesome position but when I remember Jesus Christ's promises to His
Apostles that He would send the Paraclete to bring them into all remembrances of what He told them and also bring them into further Truth in the future and that evil will not prevail against His Church... I can dismiss the harshness that sometimes is found on these «belief blogs» and hope and pray that all will eventually come to
know the Truth
as it is.
So then you are
no longer strangers and aliens, but you are citizens with the saints and also members of the household of God, built upon the foundation of the
apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself
as the cornerstone.
clumsily inserted into the Mary Magdalene story» probably out of «a desire to make the
apostles as well
as a woman witness of the empty tomb».35 But the emphasis is now
no longer on the emptiness of the tomb but on the way the linen cloths have been left lying.
«We do not
know how to pray
as we ought» confesses the mighty
apostle in Romans 8:26.
In spite of the diversity in the resurrection narratives there is one important common theme which C. F. Evans draws to our attention when he says, «The one element which the traditions, in all their variety, have in common is that the appearance of the risen Lord issued in an explicit command to evangelize the world, yet the early decades of the history of the church, in so far
as they are
known to us, make it difficult to suppose that the
apostles were aware of any such command.»
See John 20:30; Mark 16:17 - 20; John 2:11; Acts 2:22: («Ye men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you,
as ye yourselves also
know»); Acts 2:43: -LRB-»... and many wonders and signs were done by the
apostles»); Acts 4:29 - 30: «And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants, that with all boldness they may speak thy word, By stretching forth thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy hold child Jesus»); Hebrews 2:3 - 4: («How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him: God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will»); Romans 15:17 - 19: («I have therefor whereof I may glory through Jesus Christ in those things which pertain to God.
All of the other leaders in Scripture are
known as ministers and fellow laborers, but not
apostles.
It has always been recognized that the document
known as the Didachi or Teaching of the Twelve
Apostles, has a special affinity with the didactic portions of the First Gospel.
The
apostles had a special status
as long
as they lived, because they had
known the Lord personally.
In the
Apostles» Creed it is said of Jesus «He descended into hell» and the doctrine in question is
known as the Descent into Hell.
As Sharyn Dowd has observed, the apostles «advocated this system not because God had revealed it as the divine will for Christian homes, but because it was the only stable and respectable system anyone knew abou
As Sharyn Dowd has observed, the
apostles «advocated this system not because God had revealed it
as the divine will for Christian homes, but because it was the only stable and respectable system anyone knew abou
as the divine will for Christian homes, but because it was the only stable and respectable system anyone
knew about.
I presume that everyone
knows that this is a departure from the Prototype: for «in Christ Jesus,»
as the
apostle says, «there is neither male nor female.»
Obviously the speeches have historical value
as expressions of what Luke thought the
apostles had said; but we do not actually
know that they are devoid of historical basis.
As far as the Catholic Faith goes there have always been those in the Church who have done wrong, and more serious wrong than you are reading about here - namely the first Pope denying he even knew Jesus and all of the rest of the apostles abandoning God to that shameful horrifying death - when they could have stood by Him, defending Him against the authorities and even proving to them that He indeed was God - their Messiah before the
As far
as the Catholic Faith goes there have always been those in the Church who have done wrong, and more serious wrong than you are reading about here - namely the first Pope denying he even knew Jesus and all of the rest of the apostles abandoning God to that shameful horrifying death - when they could have stood by Him, defending Him against the authorities and even proving to them that He indeed was God - their Messiah before the
as the Catholic Faith goes there have always been those in the Church who have done wrong, and more serious wrong than you are reading about here - namely the first Pope denying he even
knew Jesus and all of the rest of the
apostles abandoning God to that shameful horrifying death - when they could have stood by Him, defending Him against the authorities and even proving to them that He indeed was God - their Messiah before them!
Because from his writing,
as well
as the later quotations of the
apostles and Jesus, we
know they were accurate at that time.
If Francis wants to change the «business
as normal», he would rewrite the
Apostles» Creed
as we now
know it to be: (Would said new Creed vitiate his religion - yes but he is the one preaching openness and transparency.)
Mary
known as Magdalene was Jesus» wife and his
apostle.
which in other ages was not made
known to the sons of men,
as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to His holy
apostles and prophets:
This was the secret, and famous, Cambridge Conversazione Society,
known to outsiders
as the «
Apostles» It met on Saturday nights, not for formal debate, but for free and perfectly frank discussion of ideas, following the reading of a paper.
As for the work of the
apostle and the relationship he sustained with the churches, we must depend almost entirely on the letters of Paul — and this means that we can
know very little except about Paul's own apostleship.
The
apostle Paul states that «We
know that the whole creation has been groaning
as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time» (Romans 8:22).
Paul, of course, did not have the complete New Testament
as we have it today... in fact,
as he was writing this letter, he was writing part of this first foundation, but he
knew of other letters and accounts of the life of Christ that were written by other
apostles, and so he mentions them here
as foundation number 1.
This complaint
no doubt included material support in the form of food and other necessities
as well
as pastoral care, since the
apostles said they did not have time to wait on tables.
Just
as there are
no longer «
apostles» in the same sense
as in the days of Peter and Paul, so there are
no longer «prophets» in the original high meaning of that term.
It is not
known, what triggered Mr. Jumah's sudden observation because; Kofi Ghana
as he is affectionately called, has been one of the
apostles of Nana Akufo Addo in recent years, and been out and about everywhere defending the man he now claims would be a «terrible president».
Playwright Terence McNally is probably best -
known for Corpus Christie — his controversial stage drama about Jesus and his
apostles as gay men in contemporary Texas.