Medication abortion, also
known as the abortion pill, is offered up to 70 days (10 weeks) from the first day of your last period.
PPIL provides in - clinic abortion services up to 19 weeks and 6 days gestation and offers medication abortion, also
known as the abortion pill, up to 10 weeks gestation.
Today is a banner day for sane discussion of the medical procedure
known as abortion, thanks to a plethora of articles in Tuesday's newspapers and Web sites that put the issue into legal, social and judicial context.
Not exact matches
On February 26 of this year, for instance, eight members of the Court ruled that the federal racketeering statute (popularly
known as RICO) did not apply to the efforts of the Pro-Life Action Network to shut down various
abortion clinics.
As far as I know, he hasn't appealed to any of Jesus» teachings to support his position on embryo destruction, abortion on demand, partial birth abortion, or born - alive abortio
As far
as I know, he hasn't appealed to any of Jesus» teachings to support his position on embryo destruction, abortion on demand, partial birth abortion, or born - alive abortio
as I
know, he hasn't appealed to any of Jesus» teachings to support his position on embryo destruction,
abortion on demand, partial birth
abortion, or born - alive
abortion.
As I left the party, I saw at last that
abortion was
no longer an abstract debate played out primarily in the national media and on billboards.
While Harris is
no doubt correct to criticize a loveless, sign - carrying conservative who hails women emerging from
abortion clinics
as murderers, supporting a woman through an
abortion without speaking the truth would be equally heartless.
Nino let Clarence Thomas take over reading the dissent in Stenberg v. Carhart,
as their colleagues were willing to strike down a law in Nebraska that barred the grisly procedure
known as «partial - birth
abortion.»
But
as long
as I
know how important maternal health is to Haiti's future, and
as long
as I
know that women are being abused and raped,
as long
as I
know that girls are being denied life itself through selective
abortion, abandonment, and abuse,
as long
as brave little girls in Afghanistan are being attacked with acid for the crime of going to school, and until being a Christian is synonymous with doing something about these things, you can also call me a feminist.
So, with those considerations in mind, I think it's safer to say that while legal restrictions on
abortion might put a dent in the
abortion rate, they won't put an end to
abortion as we
know it, and, most importantly, they won't do a thing to alter the number of unwanted pregnancies.
I don't think you can be a pro-life feminist and argue that women need to be condescended to and «informed of what they're doing»
as though they don't already
know (cf. laws that institute mandatory waiting periods so they can «think it over,» which puts an untenable burden on those who have to travel for
abortion procedures and do not have the money to do so).
The response of the last government was essentially more of the same: earlier and more detailed sex education, family planning clinics in schools, promotion of emergency birth control (otherwise
known as the «morning after pill») easier access to
abortion, all without the need for parental consent even in the case of underage girls.
Since morality, or beliefs, religious or otherwise, strike me
as the key driving force (after all, I'm even posting this comment in CNN's «Belief Blog») in an anti-choice individuals logical reasoning for thinking the way they do, I would like to
know exactly how making
abortion illegal will help you sleep at night, or register
as a moral victory.
The fact the so called «Liberals» oppose factual information (such
as sonograms) being provided to women considering
abortion proves that they
know full well that they are engaged in murder.
As everyone
knows, there is a tremendous cultural struggle going on in national politics, manifested in disputes over
abortion, capital punishment, gun control, crime, welfare, affirmative action, gay rights, school prayer, and other kindred things, many of which have a subtle racial dimension.
Nothing revealed the radicalism of Roe quite so dramatically
as the Court's invalidation of a Nebraska statute prohibiting the grisly procedure
known as partial - birth
abortion in the case of Stenberg v. Carhart.
In the same way, if we are,
as the
abortion - choice movement must assume, bearers of moral rights by nature (including the «right to choose»), then there can be
no right to
abortion, for the one who has the «right to choose» is identical to her prenatal self.
«In those times, we
knew about things that have become common today: the reality of
abortion, of people who manifest homosexual tendencies, whose personal dignity we always respected, but we were formed to see these acts
as absolutely unacceptable, against the nature that God had created for us.»
You will
no doubt use «thou shalt not kill»
as justification for being against
abortion.
In 1999, we are
no longer reduced to «guessing» whether he was inspired or speaking only
as a man: • adultery has lost its moral significance and become commonplace; • chastity has become a symbol of unhealthy development; • contraception in expectation of fornication is taught to children in the schools; • respect between the sexes has been replaced by mutual exploitation and / or competition; • marriage has lost its sacramental nature and its enduring promise; • statistically, divorce is common, teenage pregnancy is widespread, single parent and serially parented families increase, sexual disease is epidemic, intercourse is recreational,
abortion is ubiquitous.
Sure they do, same
as anyone has a right to say
abortion is wrong (or right, seriously... whatever) And for all the Christians out there, I
know it sucks but guess what, freedom of speech applies to atheists too.
Technological possibility will increasingly eclipse the very terms of our debate over
abortion, and I suspect that «
abortion politics»
as we
know it is on its way to being a relic of the past — a particularly brutal way we eliminated human life back when humans used to have children.
Cause that decision is made all the time and it's
no where
as big
as abortion.
Rush Limbach's comments will be taken
as gospel for the Right, but they truely illustrate the reason the GOP is in turmoil... the leaders need the Religious Right to win, but
know they are being intellectually dishonest because their values do not match the Religious Right, except on the
abortion issue, whhich will never go away because the GOP needs that 20 % of voters who would otherwise vote Democrat becasue the Liberal values match Christian values more closely.
The subsequent lawsuit,
known as Roe v Wade, led to the Supreme Court's 1973 ruling that established
abortion rights, though by that time Ms McCorvey had given birth and given her daughter up for adoption.
And it was Doe's broad definition of «health»
as «well - being» that the Court would later use to strike down even bans on the cruel procedure
known as partial - birth
abortion.
Surprisingly these so called progressive christians are strangely silent on
abortion (Otherwhise
known as killing babies) what would Jesus say about
abortion?
Even many of those who favor lower taxes (or at least oppose higher taxes) and
abortion restrictions don't
know the Republican Party
as anything other than a vehicle for upper - class interest group politics and white identity politics.
And just so you
know I 100 % believe adoption is a phenomenal choice, but we aren't just talking about
abortions performed
as a terrible form of after the fact birth control... We are talking about the
abortions performed due to health risks that could cause a severely low quality of life
as well.
Because of
Abortion and Gay marriage we may elect a President who is a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints members of which are commonly
known as Mormons or LDS (Latter - day Saint).
Much
as most English Catholics love Her Majesty the Queen, many of us felt just a little uneasywhen it became
known that she referred to the late Cardinal Hume
as «my Cardinal», and not entirely enthused by television images of Her Majesty attending Vespers at Westminster Cathedral, for all the world
as if it was Choral Evensong at Westminster Abbey: not because such ecumenical gestures are in themselves a bad thing, but because this one seemed all too likely to be have been a reward to the English Church for no longer making so much of a nuisance of itself,
as it could have done, for instance, by criticising the supposedly Catholic - minded Tony Blair for his wholehearted support for
abortion (including
abortion up to term)- a stance which, north of the border, had led the late Cardinal Winning to utter a series of blistering denunciations of the Prime Minister even during NewLabour's honeymoon years.
From the limitation of offering assisted suicide to terminally - ill patients whose prognosis is only six months of life, to the so - called «safeguard» of having two doctors check the patient has a «clear, settled, and voluntary» wish to die (and, er,
as we all
know, a two doctor requirement was such a powerful safeguard in the
Abortion Act!)
The courageous work of pro-life groups in vigils at
abortion clinics, of street pastors working with clubbers at night - time in city centres, of those offering prayer ministry for healing in shopping centres, of street evangelisers such
as the St Patrick's group in Soho - all these examples need to be better
known, and imitated.1 Then there's the output of media groups working through radio, TV, internet sites, blogs and video teaching programmes, such
as Catholic Evangelisation Services; these too, while offering an independent type of Christian teaching, provide an important stimulus to on - the - ground evangelising.
Think of the Obama voters you
know who don't want their taxes raised, don't think government works very well, and oppose late - term
abortion, but who are going to vote for Hillary Clinton because they think of conservative politics
as a battle between the grasping rich and the violently racist.
That is why, perhaps, it is impossible for Garrow to imagine a principled opposition to the reformers whose lives he chronicles, who proceed
as if an
abortion were
no more morally problematic than an appendectomy.
But in my being a humble humanitarian, I can not make a stand upon the willfulness of people wanting an
abortion no matter what one insinuates
as a cause to abort THEIR CHILD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If the insurance companies have to provide this «free» service which everyone
knows will not be free, then for my part I want
abortion ended
as soon
as this is passed.
However, since that time, dedicated
abortion advocates have asserted
abortion as a reproductive right so thoroughly at the international level that the term is
no longer understood to include that limitation.
Update (July 22): The Associated Press reports that a federal district court has struck down North Dakota's new
abortion law, which would have banned the procedure «
as early
as six weeks into pregnancy and before some women
know they are...
Men don't
know what it means to be raped and to face the prospect of pregnancy
as a result, a situation in which the morning after pill can prevent a pregnancy without causing an
abortion.
Because
abortion had become legal and easily available, that argument ran —
as you well
know — Infanticide would eventually become openly permissible, to be followed by euthanasia for infirm, expensive senior citizens.
As Catholics, we
know instinctively that maternal mortality is a tragedy and that
abortion is not the answer, but I believe that we are under an obligation to turn that knowledge into action and offer hope to mothers around the world who face the prospect of giving birth in fear and trembling rather than with joy.
Perusing the index of Origins, the weekly publication of representative documents and speeches compiled by Catholic News Service, our imaginary historian will note, for example, the following initiatives undertaken at the national, diocesan and parish levels in 1994 - 95: providing alternatives to
abortion; staffing adoption agencies; conducting adult education courses; addressing African American Catholics» pastoral needs; funding programs to prevent alcohol abuse; implementing a new policy on altar servers and guidelines for the Anointing of the Sick; lobbying for arms control; eliminating asbestos in public housing; supporting the activities of the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities (227 strong); challenging atheism in American society; establishing base communities (also
known as small faith communities); providing aid to war victims in Bosnia; conducting Catholic research in bioethics; publicizing the new Catechism of the Catholic Church; battling child abuse; strengthening the relationship between church and labor unions; and deepening the structures and expressions of collegiality in the local and diocesan church.
First, this category usually includes deaths
as a result of spontaneous
abortion, otherwise
known as miscarriage, giving a distorted picture of the number of women who are dying
as a result of induced
abortion.
Every
abortion practitioner
knows that the overwhelming majority of
abortions are carried out on social grounds andthe
abortion lobby is unapologetic about its belief that
abortion should be available «on demand and without apology», yet it uses rape survivors
as an emotive smokescreen to cover its unsavoury agendas and exploits their suffering for political and ideological gain.
Acting the day after the 44th anniversary of the US Supreme Court's legalization of
abortion, Trump signed an order restoring what is
known as the Mexico City Policy, which President Barack Obama had rescinded three days after he was inaugurated in 2009.
She can
no longer trust what some of us might think of
as her better side, explaining that if she had another child she would feel even worse because she would be admitting that the decision to have the
abortion was a dreadful mistake, admitting that she and her husband «could in fact have managed to care for another life.»
How do we
know that making
abortion legal will not diminish our respect for other forms of sometimes unwanted life, such
as the mentally and physically disabled or the infirm old, or for life in general?
You do realize, skippy, that MOST pregnancies -
as in the numeric majority of them — end in what you would call «
abortion,» otherwise
known as spontaneous
abortion, or miscarriage.
Pittman has been
known to take strong positions on social and political issues such
as abortion and immigration, sending charged email messages to select staffers and friends that leave little doubt where he stands.