Sentences with phrase «known as argument»

His scientific position relies heavily on what is known as the Argument From Authority.

«One way in which one would attempt to shift the burden of proof is by committing a logical fallacy known as the argument from ignorance.

In an argumentative essay, our writers not merely provide information on the topic only but they create a thesis statement, which is known as the argument of the essay topic.

Persuasive essay writing that is also known as the argument essay writing, involves reason and logic used to prove that some idea is more valid and genuine than some other one.

They are also commonly known as argument essays as they mostly deal with making supportive arguments to the point in question.

Not exact matches

No doubt, an interesting argument could be had about whether a future of self - driving, electrically propelled automobiles could be as clean and efficient as better public transit.

As part of the settlement announced Thursday, Aruze will no longer consider itself part of the 2010 agreement, which will open the door for Steve Wynn to renew his argument that his ex-wife's claims are moot.

Taxing them at higher rates is an increasingly popular argument, but as usual, who knows if anyone is listening to Cuban's blog rants.

As Harvard Business School lecturers John Neffinger and Matthew Kohutobserve observe in their book, «Compelling People: The Hidden Qualities That Make Us Influential,» when a discussion becomes an argument, it's no longer an exercise in logic and reasoning.

But Troy Carter, better known in his home of Los Angeles as Lady Gaga's former manager, isn't buying Swift's argument.

That argument is taken from the position of the employer, usually the small - business owner who has to adjust her growth plans to not cross the 50 - worker, full - time threshold that requires companies to provide qualifying health plans to its workers or face the penalties known officially as the «shared responsibility payments.»

In a terse decision, Judge Gregory A. Presnell of the United States District Court in Orlando rejected the former workers» arguments that Disney and the two contractors had colluded to make false statements when they applied for temporary visas, known as H - 1B, for the foreign replacements.

I don't know why people, in attempting to provide a refutation of an argument, consistently rebut arguments by simply mentioning their nationality, as if being of a certain nationality designates one as an expert in all matters concerning that nation and serves as sufficient qualification to denounce a valid opposition viewpoint.

As a well - known expert in renewable energy and energy efficiency, Konrad laid out a bullish argument for the company, and disclosed that he «had a large long position» (at the time of the article).

Paul is the earliest writer (55AD approx) but he never met Jesus and was unspecific (some would argue the Jewish Christians and Paul were incompatible but the latter won the argument which is ironic as the former actualyl knew jesus).

There is no evidence in your post, this is what is known as the «God of the Gaps» argument.

The argument you have just presented is known as Pascal's Wager and it is a thoroughly laughable argument to anyone with a brain.

«how can you claim to know what he did» For argument's sake, how do you know that God did it as you said?

As to the argument that since Jewish people do not believe in baptism — thus what difference does it make... Yes — we don't believe in it's effectiveness as a spiritual rite, but we know that it is NOT meaninglesAs to the argument that since Jewish people do not believe in baptism — thus what difference does it make... Yes — we don't believe in it's effectiveness as a spiritual rite, but we know that it is NOT meaninglesas a spiritual rite, but we know that it is NOT meaningless.

Bootyfunk, as no one really knows all of the facts of history, I usually limit my arguments to what is going on TODAY.

Your argument for god is a non sequitur and an argument known as argumentum ad ignorantiam — argument from ignorance.

Other than that, congratulations, that was the finest example of the logical fallacy known as an «Argument from Ignorance» that I have seen in a long time.

Taken as a whole they've made a very compelling argument that the explanations of the universe provided by both science and religion are incomplete and always evolving, and that one perspective is no more or less valid than another.

As James O'Donnell has written, «Memory has the power to supplant «reality,» or at least what mortals know of reality: indeed, the whole argument of this half of Book X is that it is through memory that, after the fall, we encounter a more authentic reality.»

I am unpersuaded by the argument that the designated - hitter rule threatens civilization as we have known it.

Adam, it doesn't matter where he got the arguments from, they're stupid as fvck, as any rational, critical thinker knows.

Lengthy post by Rainer Braendlein contains a thinly veiled form of the flawed argument known as Pascal's Wager.

There just isn't one» is a classic example of the logic fallacy known as the «argument from ignorance».

No matter how you cut it Theo, once you use the argument of «everything must have a cause» to assume into existence you god, you then have to address why it need not have a cause (and then why that logic can not simply be applied to the Universe itself so as to take your god out of the equation altogether.)

Jamie, your «fact» and entire argument is nothing but a logical fallacy known as an «argumentum ad ignorantiam».

I do know that even people as insightful as Wolfson do not get, or are not persuaded by, key aspects of the argument.

To those who call the therapy dangerous, Mr. Bitzer reverses the argument: «If I'd known about these therapies as a teen I could have avoided a lot of depression, self - hatred and suicidal thoughts,» he said at his apartment in Los Angeles.

I can't say I understand the Z of Z theory, or the theoretical approach you are taking, but I'm interested — as one who values argument (from arg — to shine, build up a shared «shine» — initially argument had positive connotation) I am impressed by the gap separating the «good» that we know and can say, and yet are unable to practice.

They already know the truth, and so view their job as making a case against any arguments from skeptics and doubters.

I don't know if the argument was as prescient as Wolfson and many other policy experts claim, but who am I to argue?

But he did not give us much of an argument as to why these have to be united and how we know that fact.

Post by Iroy contains instances of confirmation bias and concludes with a form of the flawed argument known as Pascal's Wager.

These debates will no doubt continue as they do for other classical figures whom the fundamentalists wish to claim for their side of the argument.

I see your argument as being there's an even deeper human condition that the arts can't ignore, no matter how much the artists want to, even if the spiritual world they are picking up on is godless or serving a different god.

«A straw man or straw person, also known in the UK as an Aunt Sally, [1][2] is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.

I know how that rock was formed... no designer required... so your ENTIRE argument disappears since EVERYTHING was not designed... as far as any can see.

As a seminary professor and author of careful, nuanced theological arguments (such as the classic Knowing God), he lacked the tract - writing flair of his peer StotAs a seminary professor and author of careful, nuanced theological arguments (such as the classic Knowing God), he lacked the tract - writing flair of his peer Stotas the classic Knowing God), he lacked the tract - writing flair of his peer Stott.

It would be interesting to know as a matter of history whether President Lincoln's desire to limit the binding force of Dred Scott ever found its way into a practical legal argument.

First he attempted to apply a logical argument, whose history extends back at least as far as Cicero's On Divination.4 According to this view, contingency (chance) and foreknowledge (fate) are contradictory assertions because a contingent event, being unnecessitated, can not be known until it occurs.

It just seems to me that as a writer / researcher who clearly knows better, it is really your job to attack, debunk and tear these assinine arguments about Obama's religious convictions to pieces rather than giving them some kind of legitimacy.

Those are what are known as fallacious arguments because they are illogical in nature.

This «how much more» argument is a recognized form of reasoning in the rabbinical literature, where it is known as «light and heavy, i.e., arguing from the less to the more important.

Even in its more sophisticated guise, such as the argument of Immanuel Kant that life in heaven is to be a due adjustment of affairs after the obvious evil known and experienced in mundane life, there is for many people little meaning.

yes, I am smart.Smart enough to know that any argument which has as its core the premise that no evidence is needed is not really an argument.

Therefore, the Universe had a cause The cosmological argument is also known as the Kalam argument.