Sentences with phrase «known as behavior»

ABA is also known as behavior analysis or a behavior modification plan (BMP).

Originally known as behavior modification, this type of therapy is often referred to today as applied behavior analysis.

Not exact matches

As person 2, you expect to know what environments, beliefs, and behaviors will bring you reward so you expect to know how to enjoy life.

As Cialdini writes, «A well - known principle of human behavior says that when we ask someone to do us a favor we will be more successful if we provide a reason.

Also known as the «cuddle hormone,» oxytocin promotes empathy, motivates prosocial behavior and helps people bond together.

With no current plans to accept Apple Pay (though down the line it, and other mobile wallets, could well be a payment option within Walmart Pay), and no set launch date for MCX (never mind that as the product of consortium, that mobile app will not be set up to meet Walmart's specific needs), Walmart could wait no longer without risking missing out on a major shift in customer behavior.

«An increase in body temperature causes an increase in physical arousal - your heart rate goes up and your blood pressure rises as your poor body tries to cool itself off, and that can be bad news for your behavior, because increased physical arousal is known to be linked to aggressive behavior,» experts explained to USA Today.

Given this fact, the researchers wondered if gelada baboons engage in a behavior known as tactical deception.

You've probably called someone you know a psychopath in passing at some point in your life, either in jest as an acknowledgment of a strange behavior, or as a fleeting response to a decision that made you angry.

What's become known as the «Group of 46» letter to Stanford Provost John Etchemendy was filed in the Phills suit, and accuses the dean of presiding over «reprimands, censures, curtailing of responsibilities, demotions, retribution for expressing concerns or raising issues, offensive behavior and decisions that have led directly to tangible employment actions such as dismissals, undesirable reassignments, forced resignations, and inequitable access to promotion opportunities.»

As far as your knowledge of that customer's behavior is concerned, it stops at knowing his / her level of satisfactioAs far as your knowledge of that customer's behavior is concerned, it stops at knowing his / her level of satisfactioas your knowledge of that customer's behavior is concerned, it stops at knowing his / her level of satisfaction.

Because of this, people who fall into a gender, racial, or ethnic group that is likely to experience negative bias have found that downplaying that association can help them sidestep discrimination, behavior known as «covering.»

This behavior, otherwise known as «humblebragging,» could be a turn - off, according to a recent study from Harvard Business School.

Spitzer has at least acknowledged and expressed some remorse for his behavior (which as far as we know, ended five years ago).

Wikipedia defines social proof, also known as informational social influence, as «a psychological phenomenon where people assume the actions of others in an attempt to reflect correct behavior for a given situation.»

One of the best examples of this behavior is exemplified by a team of hackers specific to the Ethereum ecosystem and known only as «The White Hat Group.»

After adopting AI software known as Albert which analyzed the success of online advertisements and the behavior of past customers in order to identify potential new customers, the dealership saw new sales leads increase by 2390 %.

55 % of brand marketers and communication professionals don't know if their contnet is having any digital or real world behavior as a result of the brand content (Cision)

What we now know as being a part of buyer behavior in the modern world, we saw a glimpse of back then.

Buyer behavior understanding began to surface more prominently in the mid-1970's but remained on the fringes of planning and strategies as product - centricity was entrenched in much of business as we knew it through the «80's and «90's.

Some new buyer behaviors, such as informational search, are no longer emerging but have crossed over into accepted reality.

@ CMD... I know plenty of Liberals who display the same behavior as many right - wingers.

I will no longer be respectful of the leadership of the Archbishop of Canterbury, who seems to believe that rude behavior, intolerance and even killing prejudice is somehow acceptable, so long as it comes from third - world religious leaders, who more than anything else reveal in themselves the price that colonial oppression has required of the minds and hearts of so many of our world's population.

Just as I would not expect to know every characteristic of a friend or lover or to explain every motivation for their behavior or to approve of every act which they commit or fail to commit, I don't expect to know those things about God.

Now I know as soon as I use words like «behavior» and «moral» people will say; «what gives politicians the right to lecture us?»

We have no right to continue our present behavior, as if we were the only species on earth and, moreover, as if the present generation were the last.

• There is much misinformation on this thread: o The emergent movement is not a cult o emergent started as a conversation among people of various theological / philosophical understandings and remains that way o The emergent conversation hasn't faded away at all — in fact — it's now integrated in practically every Christian expression o Mars Hill and emergent have very little in common o Mark Driscoll and Tony Jones have very little in common o I don't know of the personal behavior of everyone involved in the conversation, but because people have been involved — I'm sure there has to be bad behavior from some.

It unites the people under one banner and gives them a sense of purpose, along with immediately validating any behavior (no matter how nasty and out of character) as OK.

And if you want to know why Christians are often seen as hypocritical and violent, it is because we defend the actions in the Bible as «holy and just» while condemning identical behavior in people of other religions.

That being said, as a follower of Christ I always try to adhere to my best behavior no matter where I am, alone or in public, and I keep that in the forefront of my mind lest I be judged like the restaurant patrons you have described in this article despite the fact I don't do any of these things (i.e. t shirt, bible, leaving pamphlets in lieu of tip, etc...) Will I become a better tipper after reading this?

You are also exhibiting behavior that falls within what is known as «confirmation bias»; you are selecting those parts of what you observe that you think support your belief, while ignoring the many obvious facts that contradict it.

I've known hundreds of conservative christians, and none of them would describe the traditional, conservative hermeneutic as being that God's behavior was «just like Hitler» but since he's omnipotent it's ok to be like Hitler.

-- especially when, as most of you would know, the law prohibiting homosexual behavior is imbedded in a context in Leviticus in the holiness code, the purity code, as it's sometimes called, which also prohibits the planting of two kinds of seed in the same field, or the wearing of garments made of two kinds of cloth.

A literal interpretation is supported by statements in The Structure of Behavior such as the one in which things are described as «dynamically knowing» each other (SB 143).

For instance, when these characteristics are perceived as exhibited in an individual enduringly and in a sense in which these are understood to affect the world around in a favorable fashion — either in an objective sense of effecting something concrete outside such a person [like effecting healing, foretelling, acting as medium in a non-rational manner or simply doing good or saying good to help the people selflessly], exhibiting personal traits, conditions and states which are known to be «abnormal» [like going into trances, hearing voices, seeing visions, or just the simple unconventional behavior, which proceed from such an individual's horizon to affect, influence, impact others» horizons]-- or is subjectively perceived to be extra-ordinary — such an individual is said to be godly, god - bearing, pious or saintly.

But when I am listening to God... I know that He wants them (and me) to lead others to LOVE, not to encourage our friends in a behavior (such as hating) that grieves Him.

With this caveat, and along with it the honest admission that the material in the Gospels is not the kind that permits us (after the fashion of earlier «liberal» Protestantism) to pay Jesus what we might style moral compliments — as if he is indubitably known as in every sense, both in teaching and in behavior, to be ideally perfect — we can go on to consider his humanity, insofar as it can be recovered from the impressions of him found in the New Testament.

But we know that Jesus was innocent, and we know that though He died as a criminal, Jesus did not die because He was a criminal, but He died for all of us who are truly criminal in our behavior toward God.

Furthermore, the deconstuction and revision of the Bible to «accept» sinful acts and behaviors as part of the «Jesus loves everyone no matter what» school of thought is par for the course with the practioners of same here in this forum.

«Scripture's male - female prerequisite for marriage and its attendant rejection of homosexual behavior is pervasive throughout both Testaments of Scripture (i.e. it is everywhere presumed in sexual discussions even when not explicitly mentioned); it is absolute (i.e. no exceptions are ever given, unlike even incest and polyamory); it is strongly proscribed (i.e. every mention of it in Scripture indicates that it is regarded as a foundational violation of sexual ethics); and it is countercultural (i.e. we know of no other culture in the ancient Near East or Greco - Roman Mediterranean basin more consistently and strongly opposed to homosexual practice).

But one would never want one's behavior at a gravesite described as «chewing the scenery,» no matter how justified one's grief.

In the time of the Prophet the people of Mecca and of Arabia were known as the meanest of all in behavior.

The Christian proclamation seeks to state clearly and decisively that in Christ God has made himself known to us as one who loves us so unconditionally that his love calls for radical behavior change on our part.

Paul assumes that venereal disease is the divine punishment for homosexual behavior; we know it as a risk involved in promiscuity of every stripe, but would hesitate to label it a divine punishment, since not everyone who is promiscuous contracts it.

But this form of homosexual behavior — an act that is chosen — is quite different from homosexual Christians today who may not remember knowing themselves as other than homosexual in orientation.

If I forget to lock my door, you are still a thief if you enter my house and take anything... meaning, the banks still chose to engage in the risky behavior that caused the financial meltdown... and yes, they knew it would happen, but as long as they made enough money in the short term, who needs to care about the long term?

When seen as a life orientation, the issue raised for the church is no longer that of the sexual behavior of homosexual Christians.

I don't know about you, but I would believe the people who study the human mind, thoughts, and behavior (i.e. psychologists and sociologists), over someone who says there's some spooky external agent that no one can possibly verify the existence of, and which has no consistent pattern of action with which to use as evidence for verification.

Every intellectual person knows that can only be interpreted as being Christian behavior.

I am suggesting that maybe a central tenet of the GOOD NEWS that Jesus was preaching was that we no longer had to live in accordance with what the established religious community defined as acceptable moral behavior.