Sentences with phrase «known as errors»

Professional Liability Insurance, also known as Errors and Omissions (E&O) Insurance, is an insurance policy that protects an individual or business from the risk that they may be sued and held legally liable for something such as malpractice, injury, or negligence.

This form of coverage is also known as errors and omissions insurance, or professional liability insurance, and it can cover a huge range of professional services that involve physical, financial, or emotional risk to the client.

These are known as errors and omissions.

Also known as Errors and Omissions (E&O Insurance), professional liability insurance is protection for your business from claims of negligence related to a professional service.

OREP specializes in providing general liability insurance and professional liability insurance, also known as errors and omissions (E&O) insurance, to real estate appraisers, home inspectors, real estate agents and real estate brokers, mortgage field service and other real estate professionals nationwide.

• Also known as errors and omissions insurance, professional liability insurance protects your business against malpractice, errors, and negligence in service provided to your customers.

Not exact matches

Software robots, known as robotic process automation, help companies cut down on costs and errors, UiPath CEO Daniel Dines said.

As I point out in the video, his observations showed the masses of clusters were too large, but the numbers he got were far too high, and we now know they must have been in error (or, to be more fair, his uncertainties were too large).

Please let us know of any inconsistencies, errors, or suspicious listings that you may find as well!

Why build a car that commandeers the brakes and wheel if not to eliminate that pesky statistical variable known as «human error» — which is to say, the fallibility that makes us all kin?

I think it is difficult to know where the next crisis will come from, and, in general, it is better to have a system that is safe from errors in judgment and surprise than it is to try and avoid errors in judgment and surprises because as along as you are dealing with human beings, there will be errors and surprises.

To say your purpose is to be a loving father is in error as that is the result of a belief or world view (I do not know you so that is an example)

As a Biologist he should know the iterizations of error science goes through to get even one «fact:» remotely close to do something useful with as technologAs a Biologist he should know the iterizations of error science goes through to get even one «fact:» remotely close to do something useful with as technologas technology.

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.28 And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 backbiters, hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, covenant - breakers, without natural affection, unmerciful: 32 who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practise such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but also consent with them that practise them.

You are right, Calvinists do have tremendous flaws in their theology but then so do we all and I have found through the years that it does not help to point out peoples flaws or errors as some are just downright unteachable and others are extremely zealous for what they know.

I don't like pointing out other Christians doctrinal errors as I know that this side of eternity I will never be completely right and it is not our duty to point out Christ's servants faults.

Either this is reportage — though it may no doubt contain errors — pretty close up to the facts; nearly as close as Boswell.

But my lack of understanding is not due to errors and contradictions,... as I grow spiritually I know I will learn more.

Are you saying that the Bible is perfect, without error and no matter what we find in science, history, anthropology or anything else we are to look to the Bible as the final say?

In my judgment this is the error of a great many of the exponents of what is nowadays known as «biblical theology.»

And regardless of what you believe about the violence of God in Scripture, these books will present you with a new way of looking at things so that you no longer have to choose between accepting that God is violent or writing off the Bible as hopelessly full of error.

You have pointed out one of the scientific errors in your old book - there are many, as well as purported moments of: «Aw, Gee, how'd he know that?»

To know the indefinite as that is not ignorance or error but genuine knowledge.

As a result, they can no longer see the error of what they are doing.

I'm now saved (for the 1st time) because I have truly seen the error of my ways (Need of a Saviour), repented to God, turned from all known sin, and have trusted in Jesus Christ's atoning sacrifice as the only means of my salvation.

(p. 111) So long as such an anti-war stance, with its own sort of heroic aspirations, does not, through the sorts of errors mentioned above, condemn or spit upon the more tangible heroic feelings stirred up by the real wars that inevitably will come (and thus demand, as C.S. Lewis put it, «long - faced» warriors even for just wars), and so long as it does not plug its ears against the geo - strategic and national considerations that must remain part of all politics, she would broadly endorse it, and would encourage all of us, whether theists or not, to yearningly quest for a world without war that we nonetheless know can never fully arrive.

I'm sure you already know this, but for the benefit of some readers, we may as well point out that multiple errors have been made in copying, whether by hand or press over the generations as well.

But it is a capital error if such protesters argue, as often happens, according to the principle that I can personally do as I like, hence I should also let others do as they like, for if the other person does what he likes I can no longer do the same and act from the same situation which would obtain if the other had not acted.

I have admitted, and all Christians ought readily to admit, the imperfections and blemishes that mar the empirical church in its institutional embodiment; we can see the errors that have marked its history, and we know that not only individual members but the structures of the institution as well are far from being sinless.

I know it is a conveniant cop out to point to original scripture as being free from error since we do not have them anymore.

Faith and ReallyStupidCatholicMom, the way you keep referencing that book of errors and evil known as the bible is circular.

He knows that it is beautiful and salutary to be the individual who translates himself into the universal, who edits as it were a pure and elegant edition of himself, as free from errors as possible and which everyone can read.

As well as listing their vices, including murdering and betraying each other, Luther turned once again to describing the well - known examples of their doctrinal errors: «They put that noble child Mary right into the place of ChrisAs well as listing their vices, including murdering and betraying each other, Luther turned once again to describing the well - known examples of their doctrinal errors: «They put that noble child Mary right into the place of Chrisas listing their vices, including murdering and betraying each other, Luther turned once again to describing the well - known examples of their doctrinal errors: «They put that noble child Mary right into the place of Christ.

I other words, if John the Mediocre's activities were recorded as they happened but Jane the Magnificent's activities didn't get written down for 5 years after the fact, then even with copy errors and such, John's docu.mentation may be more reliable even if the earliest known docu.ment is more recent that Jane's earliest.

I said: «If the Bible is not inerrant, then as I stated, how do you know where the errors end and the truth begins?»

If the bible is not without error, then how do we know which parts to accept as truth and which to reject as fiction?

If the Bible is not inerrant, then as I stated, how do you know where the errors end and the truth begins?

Ignoring your error in trying to insult me (you know that fallacy I bet), you do not consider historical docu ments about Jesus that coincide with archaeological evidence as evidence?

Obviously we can not share in these various Afro - Asiatic forms of religion nor can we remain indifferent to the fact that each of them, in its own way, should regard itself as being the equal of any other and should authorize its followers not to seek to discover whether God has revealed the perfect and definitive form, free from all error, in which he wishes to be known, loved, and served.

Seen sub specie aeternitatis, encouraging someone to believe that we don't really know what God thinks about sexuality, and that each of us must work it out for ourselves, and anyway it doesn't matter much as long as we do our recycling and volunteer at a homeless shelter, is as serious an error as telling them that God hates them because they have homosexual feelings.

In this manner the Teacher thrusts the learner away from him, precisely by serving as a reminder; only that the learner, in thus being thrust back upon himself, does not discover that he knew the Truth already, but discovers his Error; with respect to which act of consciousness the Socratic principle holds, that the Teacher is merely an occasion whoever he may be, even if he is a God.

If the Teacher serves as an occasion by means of which the learner is reminded, he can not help the learner to recall that he really knows the Truth; for the learner is in a state of Error.

As far as I know the apocalyptic language and expectation of the early Church was not in error (perhaps some of our modern understandings are incorrectAs far as I know the apocalyptic language and expectation of the early Church was not in error (perhaps some of our modern understandings are incorrectas I know the apocalyptic language and expectation of the early Church was not in error (perhaps some of our modern understandings are incorrect).

Not having known how to recognize what is truly diabolical about a Hitler — his manner of localizing all evil in the outsider so as to clear himself — we fell into the same error as he.

Fairly recently, beginning around 1996 the name «Goji» was «borrowed» from the Tibetan culture and used to market another similar lycium berry known for hundreds of years as the Chinese «wolfberry» and that caused market confusion and still remains a marketing error today.

I just feel like as long as everyone is in the know, it makes my life easier and there is less room for error.

Obviously Cech is a big plus from the original team, I must admit I was worried that he may revert back to Ospina as he is now fit, but even Wenger knows there is no room for error at all.

I have seen West Brom played Chelsea and they was just as stubborn one error cost them the game, we were far better in the attacking third than chelsea versus them, so i will say a well earned three points, i know we are pissed off from the past two games, but this was not a easy team to beat.

They probably count a pass straight out to his opposition as the error, but we know that he has more than that.

Wenger knows there is no room for error at all: «We know that we need nearly the perfect run and we know as well that we don't look only in front of us, we look behind us as well.»