Sentences with phrase «known as positive feedback»

As high latitudes warm under climate change, they are likely to release more methane, which will in turn boost warming, in what is known as a positive feedback.

A big reason for this is that they create the conditions that produce themselves, known as a positive feedback loop.

This is known as positive feedback.

Losing reflective sea ice speeds up Arctic warming — what's known as a positive feedback.

Not exact matches

Novo Nordisk said the initial feedback for its Ozempic diabetes drug, known generically as semaglutide, was positive and that the formulary coverage was «progressing well».

It's also a good idea to let your employees know that positive customer feedback can boost revenues, as well as their compensation.

I appreciate you letting me know — I honestly like critical feedback just as much as positive!

I know, but the bottom line is most of the positive feedback from the melting of ice has already been used up as we left the LGM.

The device is the first touch display BlackBerry in RIM's lineup and features a new type of display technology known as ClickThrough that makes the entire glass - front display act like a button, ensuring positive feedback when making selections or typing.Â

Negative feedback, Chen explained, is no less stimulating than positive feedback, especially as it relates to game design.

With a successful Steam Greenlight and Kickstarter and several dozen lets plays of our Demo and a lot of positive feedback we feel a bit of the stress to make a whole flawless experience relieved as we know we got so many great people supporting us.

I read that as saying that we don't yet know whether the resultant feedback is going to turn out positive or negative.

On sensitivity positive and negative feedbacks: Since the temps are pushing the upper bounds of the estimated ranges, one could say reasonably that what we don't know has more in common with the speed of the feedbacks, not the question of CO2 sensitivity as you infer.

The known negative feedback mechanisms can reduce the warming, but they do not appear to be so strong as the positive moisture feedback.

As far as I know all the GCM's assume positive cloud feedbacks to get to some of the higher temperature increaseAs far as I know all the GCM's assume positive cloud feedbacks to get to some of the higher temperature increaseas I know all the GCM's assume positive cloud feedbacks to get to some of the higher temperature increases.

Alan, we know with 100 % certainty that there are positive feedbacks as well as negative feedbacks.

Re 9 wili — I know of a paper suggesting, as I recall, that enhanced «backradiation» (downward radiation reaching the surface emitted by the air / clouds) contributed more to Arctic amplification specifically in the cold part of the year (just to be clear, backradiation should generally increase with any warming (aside from greenhouse feedbacks) and more so with a warming due to an increase in the greenhouse effect (including feedbacks like water vapor and, if positive, clouds, though regional changes in water vapor and clouds can go against the global trend); otherwise it was always my understanding that the albedo feedback was key (while sea ice decreases so far have been more a summer phenomenon (when it would be warmer to begin with), the heat capacity of the sea prevents much temperature response, but there is a greater build up of heat from the albedo feedback, and this is released in the cold part of the year when ice forms later or would have formed or would have been thicker; the seasonal effect of reduced winter snow cover decreasing at those latitudes which still recieve sunlight in the winter would not be so delayed).

35, L20704, doi: 10.1029 / 2008GL035333, 2008], due to Andrew Dessler and his colleagues, who (as you would know) used the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA's Aqua satellite to show that the water - vapor feedback is strongly positive, tending to double the initial warming due to CO2 itself.

I personally think IPCC will lose less by openly conceding that clouds have always been «the largest source of uncertainty» and that it now appears that some of tis «uncertainty» is being cleared up, with the models no longer predicting a net positive cloud feedback as before.

What you describe, if it happens, is in the same direction as that which reduces the size of the so - called hot spot, and we know that the hot spot would be a negative feedback, so its weakening makes the total feedback more positive.

Of course Ferdinand is right not to project catastrophism onto anthropogenic CO2 levels for as you likely know there is a inverse logarithmic relationship between changes in temperature and CO2 levels such that without the assumed positive feedback from water vapour there is no chance of runaway global warming, tipping points or whatever.

The implication of this statement is that there seems to be negative feedbacks dominating rather than positive feedbacks and that the Earth is still functioning well as a repository for life as we know it.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

As we both know, physical observations of CERES satellites since AR4 was published (Spencer + Braswell) have shown that the net cloud feedback over the tropics is strongly negative, rather than positive, as assumed by IPCAs we both know, physical observations of CERES satellites since AR4 was published (Spencer + Braswell) have shown that the net cloud feedback over the tropics is strongly negative, rather than positive, as assumed by IPCas assumed by IPCC.

Now they have described some of the known knowns: we now know without doubt that methane is venting to Earth's atmosphere from parts of the ESAS seabed in copious quantities as a response - a positive feedback - to warming.

But set some kind of time stamp or marks of when you as an employer, as the supervisor want to go in and give this employee feedback whether it's positive or critical and let them know how they're doing because they would hate to be working on something incorrectly for a long period of time only to get that annual review and then not have time to adjust or shift.

Leaving a job when you have realized that it is no longer a fit can be a peaceful process, as long as you keep your feedback positive and make sure that you and your manager have a relationship that can handle the conversation.

Video feedback is a generic term that refers to the use of videotaped interactions of the parent and child to promote parental sensitivity; it is variously known as Video Interaction Guidance (VIG), Interaction Guidance (IG), Video Home Training (VHT) and Video Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parentingfeedback is a generic term that refers to the use of videotaped interactions of the parent and child to promote parental sensitivity; it is variously known as Video Interaction Guidance (VIG), Interaction Guidance (IG), Video Home Training (VHT) and Video Feedback Intervention to Promote Positive ParentingFeedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting (VIPP).