Sentences with phrase «known building scientist»

You may not realize that among his many other accomplishments, Dr. Joseph Lstiburek, the well known building scientist and Canadian firebrand, invented the Turbo Thermo - Encabulator Max.

Not exact matches

(As Werth explains, the analogy most commonly used is that of a lock and key, in which scientists first model the interior of the cylinder in order to know what kind of key to build.)

No doubt, it is a dismaying picture that confronts us: British company SCL Group, operating under the brand name Cambridge Analytica with the supervision of Steve Bannon, obtained data collected from Facebook by Cambridge University academic Alexandr Kogan, and used systems built by data scientist and whistleblower - to - be Chris Wylie to train its microtargeting algorithms to nudge scores of already - angry voters towards electing Donald Trump and leaving the European Union — a set of experiments largely bankrolled by US hedge - fund billionaire Robert Mercer, 90 % owner of Cambridge Analytica.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

This is essentially the start of the big bang; nothing bizarre this is what scientist have built a case for... ID gives the answer to «how could nothing produce everything we know.»

Scientists have researched a critical point --- > physical building blocks of the universe have gradually vanished; that is, atoms and quarks no longer seem solid at all but are actually clouds of energy, which in turn disappear into the void that seems to be the source of creation.

No doubt, it is a dismaying picture that confronts us: British company SCL Group, operating under the brand name Cambridge Analytica with the supervision of Steve Bannon, obtained data collected from Facebook by Cambridge University academic Alexandr Kogan, and used systems built by data scientist and whistleblower - to - be Chris Wylie to train its microtargeting algorithms to nudge scores of already - angry voters towards electing Donald Trump and leaving the European Union — a set of experiments largely bankrolled by US hedge - fund billionaire Robert Mercer, 90 % owner of Cambridge Analytica.

Few scientists know more about that soup than Green, a 42 - year - old theoretical ecologist and the director of the University of Oregon's Biology and the Built Environment (BioBE) Center.

Mexico City fast became one of the best - studied earthquake zones in the world and scientists now know that buildings of these heights reacted to the particular frequency generated by the shake - amplifying landfill.

The parasites might trigger these problems, the scientists hypothesized, by upsetting the normal balance between cells known as osteoclasts, which dissolve bone, and cells called osteoblasts, which build it back up.

Scientists already knew that ocean acidification was preventing coral from producing the material that forms the building blocks of reefs.

In recent years, however, as the true nature of students» and postdocs» future opportunities has become too obvious to ignore, the disparity between what young scientists learn on campus and what they need to know in order to build their own professional futures has also become obvious enough to cause «widespread criticism and calls for reform,» the report says.

rOpenSci was built for scientists motivated to share but who don't know how, Ram says.

Rather than using substances known as metamaterials to hide objects in plain sight, some scientists instead want to use the strange materials to build windows into worlds with fundamentally different physics.

Scientists have long suspected that our planetary companion was built when a Mars - sized body — commonly known as Theia — struck the young Earth, throwing molten rock into orbit that coalesced into the Moon.

Most of the prize money will go to new research and a company party, but CureVac also plans to use some of it to build an exhibit honoring Friedrich Miescher, a 19th century Swiss scientist whose discovery of nucleic acids isn't widely known.

Scientists can try to induce the immune system, known as immunotherapy, to go into attack mode to fight cancer and to build long lasting immune resistance to cancer cells.

«Electron lifetime [in the belts] now must be different than it was before the transmitters were built, but we don't know how different,» Rodger told New Scientist.

European planetary scientists are still building the roving laboratory they plan to send to Mars in 2018, but now they know where it will land: Oxia Planum.

But what do scientists know that could, in theory, reveal how to build a lightsaber?

He knew the scientists who had built instruments for Mars 96 had spares; that's standard procedure in space science.

In September, German scientist Gangolf Jobb announced on his website that researchers in eight European countries, including Germany and the United Kingdom, were no longer allowed to use Treefinder, which builds phylogenetic trees from sequence data.

Knowing the origin of each cell and which genes control their normal function are the foundations for scientists to decipher the disease process and eventually to find out how to guide the cells to self - repair or even to build up a brand new organ using amended cells from the patients.»

Materials scientists working to build tiny machines called microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) struggle with surface interactions, called van der Waals forces, that can make nanomaterials sticky to the point of permanent adhesion, a phenomenon known as «stiction».

«Most of what's known about the bottom of the ocean has come from images shot miles up in the water column, and it's a relatively coarse data set,» Cameron said recently at roundtable discussion in New York City with WHOI scientists who design, build and operate manned and robotic deep - sea exploration vehicles.

Scientists have known that, in organisms ranging in complexity from yeast to humans, different kinds of cellular stress — such as a backlog of unfolded proteins, DNA - damaging UV light, a shortage of the amino acid building blocks needed to make protein, viral infection, iron deficiency — trigger different enzymes to act downstream to switch off eIF2 alpha.

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital scientists have identified an enzyme that can halt or possibly even reverse the build - up of toxic protein fragments known as plaques in the brains of mice with Alzheimer's disease.

In HD, scientists know that the mutant huntingtin protein builds up in cells.

Thanks to a previous study, the scientists already knew that replacing the traditional three big meals per day with 6 smaller meals worked better for shedding fat and building muscle, so now they wanted to find out whether 6 solid meals per day provided better results in terms of body composition and physical performance than 3 solid meals and 3 protein shakes per day.

A decade later, a scientist from the other side of the world would build on his findings and establish the calorie we know today.

From: Brad Pilon - Former supplement developer and research scientist To: People who want to know exactly how much protein the really need to build muscle.

In a cohort of studies spanning the past forty years, scientists have found that deficient magnesium levels are linked with all known cardiovascular risk factors including high blood pressure, arterial plaque build - up, calcification of soft tissues, excess cholesterol levels and hardening of the arteries.

However, fans of the book should know Garland has taken only the most basic building blocks of VanderMeer's story about a team of female scientists who travel into a mysterious land area that has suddenly transformed, and from which no other group has ever returned.

Starring Paul Rudd, Jeff Daniels, Paul Giamatti and Mark Strong — among other actors in an A-list ensemble — The Catcher Was a Spy tells the remarkable, little - known true story of Moe Berg (Rudd), a professional baseball player who became a spy in service of the Office of Strategic Services, the precursor to the CIA, during World War II, sent out to stop German scientist Werner Heisenberg (Strong) from building an atomic bomb for the Nazis.

For Frederick's grandfather, in case you haven't already worked that bit out, is Dr Victor Frankenstein, the crackpot scientist best known for taking bits of dead people and using them to build his very own monster.

That's because the Core Knowledge Sequence is built on the principle, firmly established by cognitive scientists, that we learn new knowledge by building on what we already know.

Youth engaged in relationship - building activities, including game nights, career tours, and movie nights (shout - out to those who saw Hidden Figures and met a female NASA scientist who knew the women from the movie!).

Now scientists are unraveling the earliest building blocks of math — and what children know about numbers as they begin first grade seems to play a big role in how well they do everyday calculations later on.

Are you really, really serious about allowing the build - up of CO2 to a level not seen since Antarctica first acquired its ice sheet, just on your belief, or suspicion, or hunch, contrary to what those that have actually studied these things think they know, that this «control knob» might not be doing much; just because scientists have not managed to prove, to your satisfaction, that consequences like the above are certain, rather than just very well possible?

Any model - building scientist should know about overfitting and understand the relationship of the number of parameters to the useability of a model.

To build this archive, scientists first had to examine how Sr / Ca ratios behaved during modern times, when sea temperatures were known.

I know you can't find anything real world to show your AGWScienceFiction claim that shortwave from the Sun heats the Earth and you certainly can't find any rational sane applied scientist building visible light heating systems for the home..

Experienced scientists know how to work together and build on each others work.

No matter what the polls say about the beliefs of the scientists, the real matter is building a UN controled political consensus.

It's well known that Lstiburek, one of the most eminent building scientists in North America, pals around with Trump.

As just one example; «How we can know an average global sea surface temperature back to 1850 when so much of the world was unexplored let alone its oceans measured» should be just one example that should make scientists question whether the models they build are actually using reliable data, or whether they think they already know the answer and therefore just use data that supports it, no matter its doubtful provenance.

Well; if a statement regarding atmospheric cooling is taking place, and we know from past experience (climate history) that if this cooling continues and the build up of ice continues in Antartica like it is; then it is possible that the planet may very well be headed back into an ice age - and when this «atmospheric cooling» trend is mentioned on the GISS [NASA] Webpage, and by one of the GISS scientists (Kate Marvel, a climatologist at GISS and the paper's lead author) then i would have to conclude that the are embracing the science revealing evidence that such mechanics are, taking place, and I view their statemnt as an endorsement and ot their recognition, of global cooling.

Scientists know that climate change has a long, built - in, lag time, which means it will keep getting worse for decades even as people reduce carbon emissions.

For years, scientists have warned that the world's oceans are becoming a plastic soup, with ocean gyres where plastic and other debris build up (also known as «garbage patches») covering a quarter of the earth's surface.

As a real scientist with an MS is in Computer Science and a PHD in Math who has spent a 40 year career building computer models of physical systems I can say with 100 % confidence that NOBODY knows the long term effects of increased CO2.