This leaves the solar cycle the only
known cause of climate change on large scale, up to modern times where there is a documented antropogenic contribution.
Not exact matches
We also
know CO2
causes climate change - but vented gas (methane - the prime component
of your home heating gas) is many times stronger as a greenhouse gas.
The president
of Kinder Morgan Canada, Ian Anderson, recently claimed he is not smart enough to
know whether human activity — i.e. the fossil fuel industry —
causes climate change.
I can explain
climate change as a result
of a natural cycle
caused by the masses and orbits
of the planets, but I don't go around calling believers in humans
causing climate change idiots simply because I
know what actually
causes it.
«New Yorkers
know too well the devastation
caused by
climate change, and in order to slow the effects
of extreme weather and build our communities to be stronger and more resilient, we must make significant investments in renewable energy,» Cuomo said.
«There is a certain ironic satisfaction in seeing a study funded by the Koch Brothers — the greatest funders
of climate change denial and disinformation on the planet — demonstrate what scientists have
known with some degree
of confidence for nearly two decades: that the globe is indeed warming, and that this warming can only be explained by human -
caused increases in greenhouse gas concentrations,» he wrote.
«We
know that these large global mean
changes are going to be associated with local and regional
changes that are going to
cause real problems in some areas,» says Andy Challinor, an expert on
climate and agriculture at the University
of Leeds in England.
While some may see evidence
of rapid glacier thinning in the past and again today as evidence that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is nearing a collapse driven by human -
caused climate change, Steig said at this point, scientists just don't
know whether that is the case.
«My view is that we don't
know what's
causing climate change on this planet, and the idea
of spending trillions and trillions
of dollars to try and reduce CO2 emissions is not the right course for us,» he told an audience in Pittsburgh, then advocated for aggressive oil drilling.
«Agents doing the dirty bidding
of the fossil fuel industry
know they can't contest the fundamental science
of human -
caused climate change,» he said in an email.
«I don't
know enough about
climate change to say if that is the direct
cause, but the way we have farmed has steadily evolved,» Ireland told ClimateWire on a visit to his Grange Farm about 130 miles north
of London.
It's better
known as the greenhouse effect — the
cause of global
climate change.
(Reuters)- The U.S. electric industry
knew as far back as 1968 that burning fossil fuels might
cause global warming, but cast doubt on the science
of climate change and ramped up coal use for decades afterward, an environmental watchdog group said on Tuesday.
We have
known the region is a
climate warming hotspot for a while, but we couldn't explain what was
causing the pattern
of glacier
change.
«If you're wondering why so many politicians and news sources deny that dangerous human -
caused climate change is real, and you want a relatively short and easy - to - read summary
of the issue, look
no further than The Madhouse Effect»
The best estimates
of the forcings — literally how hard we're pushing on the
climate over the period from 1750 to 2005, both human
causes and the principle
known natural
caused changes in the amount
of sunlight reaching the earth over this period — overwhelming the human
causes are prevailing.
We
know, based on the work and expertise
of the vast majority
of climate scientists and virtually every leading scientific organization in the world, that human -
caused climate change is real and dangerous.
«Agents doing the dirty bidding
of the fossil fuel industry
know they can't contest the fundamental science
of human -
caused climate change.
And parents don't
know that our district will be the model for all others — because we do it best — we will collect SSP data in the form
of social and emotional surveys, we will
change our curriculum to socially engineer our children with social and emotional instruction without parents suspecting a thing, we will assess and survey up the wazoo about academics, school
climate, cyberbullying, etc. while willing parents stand by, we will enhance our teacher evaluation program and refine it into a well - oiled teacher manipulation machine, and since our kids would do well no matter what because we have uber - involved parents, it will look like everything the Administrators are doing at the State's recommendation
causes the success.
NPR has always struck me as fairly balanced in that they always give both sides
of the story,
no matter how nutty or fucking ridiculous the other side is (like those who still believe abortions
cause cancer,
climate change isn't real because there's still ice in the oceans, etc).
I have a question for you — as you
know, «
climate change» is happening... whether human
caused or not, it certainly feels like we are seeing more extreme weathers
of late.
Nowhere in this list are the
known causes of major threats to human life
of income disparity, endemic disease, resource depletion, or radical
climate change.
I
know that you won't publish this but the amount
of abuse for Dr. Curry that you are allowing to be published here is counterproductive to the
cause of climate change.
We
know that greenhouse gases are heavily implicated as a
cause of climate change.
Walt, if you've ever studied Pleistocene geology and the million year history
of glacial advances and interglacial warming cycles you would
know human - induced global warming and
climate changes are the dominant
cause of current and future catastrophic consequences.
Holdren says it's
no longer realistic to focus on mitigating the
causes of climate change — efforts such as limiting carbon emissions from fossil - fuel combustion.
Now for
climate change work, we don't care so much about the actual temperature, but do want to
know about the trend, so it is possible to create an alternative algorithm that is free from the systemic biases
caused by attempts to merge thousands
of low grade temperature records together.
The problem is that you can not determine that — unless you
know the amount and
cause of natural
climate change.
Do you think (not only you, but almost all scientists
of the world), you can come up with some results that you might be hidden in your team combinatorics which have no true foundation in nature, nor do you
know what
causes climate change and all other phenomena on the planet.
Finally, as I noted before, all
of this is just a very roundabout way for you to avoid saying «
No, I don't
know of one single extinction
caused by
climate change».
For example, the skill in simulating the
climate of the last century when accounting for all
known forcings demonstrates the
causes of recent
climate change (Chapter 9) and this information can be used to constrain the likelihood
of future regional
climate change (Stott et al., 2006; see also Section 11.10.2).
Other possible
causes of climate change, particularly the sun, will continue to be judged by the traditional standards despite what we
know about: the modest but statistically significant 20th - century solar forcing, the cooler young sun, and
climate during the Dalton and Maunder minima.
But Tolstoy
knew better: Put simply: I think that
climate change was one
of many
causes contributing to the rise
of IS in Iraq and Syria, and that if we permit
climate change to continue unchecked we will see more such instances in the future.
The two nations are the largest producers
of the materials
known to
cause global
climate change.
Internally, it has
known about the
causes and effects
of climate change since the 1970s.
Reducing the impacts
of human -
caused climate change through the use
of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage — better
known as BECCS — could... Read More
In fact, it is precisely because «the discussion about the
causes of global warming was to a very great extent settled by the date
of broadcast», meaning that
climate change was
no longer a matter
of political controversy, that a programme claiming it is all a pack
of lies could slip past the partiality rules.
«agents doing the dirty bidding
of the fossil fuel industry
know they can't contest the fundamental science
of human -
caused climate change.
Scientists
know that
climate change is being
caused by people, and that people are at the heart
of its solution.
We
know from earlier work that uncertainty is no
cause for inaction — on the contrary, greater scientific uncertainty should make us worry more, not less, about the potential consequences
of climate change.
We can do that by internalizing the
known costs
of global warming and
climate change and sea level rise that are not currently reflected in the price
of the products that are
causing them.
If the sun is primarily responsible for observed global air temperature
changes (even if heavily modulated by ocean behaviour as I contend elsewhere) then we need to
know sooner rather than later otherwise a misdiagnosis
of the
causes of climate change could
cause unimaginable disruption and hardship through the imposition
of incorrect remedies.
Reports such as those
of the Nongovernmental International Panel on
Climate Change (NIPCC) demonstrate that science is far too immature to know what, if any, GHG concentrations would cause «dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Climate Change (NIPCC) demonstrate that science is far too immature to
know what, if any, GHG concentrations would
cause «dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system.
climate system.»
... «When you hear a phrase like he said, «the highest ever,» you
know, «off the charts,» «record setting,» that's a good sign that on top
of a whatever local weather patterns there are or regional like El Nino, global warming, fossil fuel driven
climate change is putting its finger on the scale and juicing the atmosphere and
causing the even bigger weather event than you would have otherwise seen.»
When life on Earth ends, however, no one will
know what
caused it — the
cause could have been ANY
of the MANY environmental threats we were told were going to end life on Earth as we
knew it, starting in the 1960s with DDT... then other pesticides, acid rain, hole in the ozone layer, global warming, global cooling,
climate change, etc..
``... it is extremely unlikely that global
climate change of the past 50 years can be explained without external forcing and very likely that it is not due to
known natural
causes alone.»
Doesn't fit the AGW message pounded into pliable brains... most the MSM are cheerleaders for the warmists and a troubling percentage
of them are forgetting the message
change to well,
climate change vs the old too narrow warming schtick...
of course we
know that the sun's solar minimum is
caused by big oil.
And on the
causes and possible consequences
of climate change, the scientific truth is there's too much we just don't
know.
For my whole life, the federal government has
known that
climate change,
caused by our carbon emissions, would endanger generations
of Americans.
So, meteorologists should
know the science behind the
causes of climate change better than most other scientists.