Sentences with phrase «known climate expert»

a - Professor Salby is a well - known climate expert, so what he suggests should be considered seriously b - His hypothesis would radically alter the ongoing scientific debate surrounding the AGW theory unless falsified scientifically c - «talking about these issues» will bring us new knowledge and will undoubtedly include attempts to scientifically falsify his hypothesis

We asked a well known climate expert, Dr. Timothy Ball, if what Obama's NOAA / NCDC climate scientists are doing is common in the general science community: that is, is it common to constantly revise historical empirical evidence?

It's good to be back on DE, but at the Lair I talked to a well known climate expert who said that she often reads Andy's posts but skips the comments: the deniers are a little too distracting and ridiculous.

Not exact matches

He is a cool climate expert who knows San Luis Obispo County viticulture like the back of his hand.

«We know that these large global mean changes are going to be associated with local and regional changes that are going to cause real problems in some areas,» says Andy Challinor, an expert on climate and agriculture at the University of Leeds in England.

There is cloud hanging over climate science, but one Cornell University expert on communication and environmental issues says he knows how to help clear the air.

Oppenheimer and his co-authors use a technique known as «structured expert judgment» to put an actual value on the uncertainty that scientists studying climate change have about a particular model's prediction of future events such as sea - level rise.

Talking Points Memo confirmed that «The Interior Department is «reviewing» whether a government climate change expert held over from the Bush administration received improper payments from an institution known for its opposition to environmental regulation, a spokesman tells TPM.»

The few authors who have such expertise are known to have extreme views that are out of step with nearly every other climate expert.

Thus, climate experts also know what one of us, Kevin Trenberth, actually meant by the out - of - context, misrepresented quote used in the op - ed.

Climate experts know that the long - term warming trend has not abated in the past decade.

The bottom line, according to a group of experts not involved in any of these studies: Scientists don't know much about how sunlight interacts with our planet, and until they understand it, they can't accurately predict any possible effects of human activity on climate change.

This research workshop focused on the issue of how future climate change might affect transportation and brought together top transportation and climate change experts to explore what is currently known about the interaction between climate change and transportation and identify key potential risks.

It is advisable to get a climate change assignment help from the experts to know more about its insights.

Predicting the climate seems to be like betting on horses, there are alot of experts who know which horse that will win, but very few that actually get rich from betting on them.

If one does climate science, one has to be up on all the contributing disciplines at least to the extent that one knows the basics, the real experts, and could at least review a paper for general interest in the field.

In this piece, Broad attempts to discredit Gore's «An Inconvenient Truth» by exaggerating the legitimate, but minor, criticisms of his treatment of the science by experts on climate science, and presenting specious or unsubstantiated criticisms by a small number of the usual, well - known contrarians who wouldn't agree even if Gore read aloud from the latest IPCC report.

«At the core of the plaintiff's lawsuit is the idea that these companies have long known about risks of their products... yet they took a course of action that resisted regulation and sought to keep them on the market as long as possible,» said Burger, the Columbia climate law expert.

Such a team would included a few scientists expert in a specific field of Climate Science willing to act publicly with their real names and background info available and known.

The thing that constantly amazes me about Americans and climate change is the assumption of so many non-climate scientists that they know the science better than the experts... that there is some obvious thing none of the professionals have even thought of.

Several experts said it was not plausible from the get - go, but for the sake of due diligence, I queried a heap of the Arctic oceanographers and climate and ice experts I've gotten to know since my North Pole journey in 2003.

I believe in climate change, I just have read enough to know that I am not sure about CO2 and being told, that it right because it is an experts opinion does not cut it.

In this case, the committee might have discovered more than a few papers by one of them on the subject, such as Risbey and Kandlikar (2002) «Expert Assessment of Uncertainties in Detection and Attribution of Climate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in expert elicitation of climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the confeClimate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in expert elicitation of climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the confeclimate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the conference).

No, experts say the effects of climate change, including drought - like conditions, higher temperatures, and abundant fuel for burning, are clearly evident.

When Lacis becomes an expert on clouds, water vapor, oceanic heat storage, aerosols, programming GCMs, measuring and adjusting surface temps, and paleo - climate; then maybe I'll care what he says about what might happen over the next 10 to 20 years (but not the next hundred, because no one knows that).

Stefan Lohmann — responsible for conceptual design, booking, and marketing: «I arranged our kick - off meeting because I knew that Sascha is not only an expert on questions of carbon neutrality and climate protection, but he's also open - minded, and I was therefore very confident that he would support our idea.

The much embarrassing «Pause» continues to ignore the predictions of the wrong - way IPCC and government - funded climate «scientists» - you know, the «experts» who have been long predicting end - of - the - world global warming since the late 80's.

If you're relatively familiar with the climate «debate», you will know that the rapid cooling period from the 1940's to the 1970's led to climate «experts» (climate scientists) declaring the end of life as we know it, in the form of the «Global Cooling» scare:

Fortunately, most of the Denizens are self - educated, pro-active experts who know all the details of climate science — otherwise, this blog might have a tendency to degenerate into mere egotistical verbosity.

I don't know a single climate expert who thinks any significant amount of ice would survive a 1,000 ppm world.

«It's a whole new ball game and climate trend lines can no longer be followed,» said Pervaiz Amir, a water expert and former member of the Prime Minister's Task Force on Climate climate trend lines can no longer be followed,» said Pervaiz Amir, a water expert and former member of the Prime Minister's Task Force on Climate Climate Change.

We are proud to provide a forum for the thousands of scientists and policy experts who actually understand climate change — how complex it is, how much we don't know, and the difference between scientific knowledge and scientific forecasting — and don't just «believe» it in.

I think we have three key problems of climate change, environmental pressures generally, and growing danger of resource scarcity, and they strongly interrelate, but knowing the appropriate individual response is hard, and not even the experts can say with any certainty.

There are so many unknowns about climate change that it's impossible to know if a climate scientist is really an expert, or whether his current theories will be proven completely wrong in the future.

One of the strongest opponents I know of this appropriation of climate models is the preeminent expert in numerical analysis and dynamical systems, Chris Essex, who himself worked on climate models for years.

Yet if this really was the conspiracy to keep out dissenting voices which Laframboise hints at, then how does she explain the presence of well known climate science sceptics such as William Kininmonth, Ross McKitrick and Stephen McIntyre who were all given roles as «expert reviewers» in the last IPCC report?

Jimmy Carter's leading expert on glaciers knew that the «collapse» of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet «has nothing to do with climate»

Darwall, an economist and CPS - listed expert, is best known for his book The Age of Global Warming, which has been touted by notorious climate denial think tank the Heartland Institute as being «the first book to tell the full story of the concerns over global warming.»

Whether Mitt Romney «knows more» about climate science than Barack Obama is possible but uncertain — that neither is an expert is fairly certain.

Berkeley Earth uses modern and advanced statistics in several of our papers, and we know that experts in climate change are not necessarily the best people to evaluate novel statistical approaches.

Mary Pipher, a «renowned» psychologist, plus being an «expert» in climate science, is also a denier of known climate facts.

But when this topic is examined in detail, most of the experts — including mainstream liberals who believe in climate change and human causation — understand that what they don't know is far greater than what they do understand.

I am not a climate expert but do know enough to believe global warming is being anthropogenically influenced and is of at least moderate concern.

He is an expert on the climate in outer space, as his blog so clearly notes, and he knows the difference between the weather and climate in this realm.

The significantly higher early climate warming rates versus modern warming are not only unexplained by experts, but also by the computer climate models that have become known for being utter flops.

That's why I have stopped listening to climate change experts because at the end of the day, they know little more about future climate trends than the average Joe.

It's very reassuring to know how the very average alarmist has such a good grip on climate «problems» whereas the expert sceptic.......

Despite this well documented, spectacular and long known failure of the «consensus,» «expert» climate models, the stuck - on - stupid tabloid press is just now coming to grips with their own spectacular stupidity (gullibility?).

That would be exactly the same mistake that the climate «experts» made with the chart on the left - concluding that the temperature trends would just keep accelerating until hellish warmth would end - civilization - as - we - know - it.

In 2012, Oreskes was instrumental in arranging a CAI workshop of legal experts that evolved in 2016 into a conspiracy by 17 state attorneys general to criminalize climate skepticism — also known as the failed #ExxonKnew campaign.