Sentences with phrase «known climate sceptic»

Michaels is a well known climate sceptic who has revealed that he receives around 40 % of his funding from the oil industry.

One of the authors, Willie Soon, is a well - known climate sceptic.

-LSB-...] three charges were rejected by sources such as Fox News and well know climate sceptic blog site Climate Audit.

Not exact matches

A known sceptic of human - induced climate change, advocate of fossil fuels, and critic of several government - run climate programs, the ex governor of Texas» nomination have many involved parties worried.

The Deputy Leader of UKIP Lord Monckton of Brenchley, a well known sceptic on climate change, wrote to the Telegraph today saying of the prince:

In a 2003 email, Mann discusses encouraging colleagues to «no longer submit [papers] to, or cite papers in» Climate Research, after it published papers by known sceptics «that couldn't get published in a reputable journal».

It's hard to know just how far this view has seeped into mainstream climate scepticism, but the themes of corrupt science and cheating and lying climate scientists are widely disseminated on sceptic blogs and other outlets.

I'm researching the sceptics view of climate change for an international engineering firm that needs to know more about how this issue will affect us... I've got the IPCC report and other things that support anthropogenic climate change, but I need to address the other side of the argument as well, especially for a group of conservative engineers.

That's an argument than even deeply non-technical non-scientists of the general public (and Congress / Senate) can understand - part of their «figuring out who knows what about science» mental toolkit that Dan so admires - which is probably why climate science communicators on the sceptic side are so keen to communicate it.

I have extensively read scientist Mike Hulme's presentation of climate change as PNS, but do you know of any other alarmist or sceptic scientists calling it as PNS?

When warmists started calling sceptics denialists, I immediately knew that they're projecting — they were the ones who denied climate change.

As you know, I often argue with climate sceptics too.

In the early 1990s, a group of sceptics claimed that Roger Revelle, one of the first climate scientists, had changed his mind about global warming and no longer believed it was a serious problem.

So when you then add «I came to this blog seriously hoping that there was an honest climate skeptic,» I would suggest that you came here with the intent to look for any evidence, no matter how semantic, pointless or ridiculous, to reinforce your view that all sceptics are «dishonest.»

Many senior scientists are no better; even Lord Rees, President of the Royal Society, recently referred to climate sceptics as «village idiots».

The programme featured scientists known as climate sceptics, such as Richard Lindzen at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Phillip Stott, emeritus professor at the University of London.

Yet if this really was the conspiracy to keep out dissenting voices which Laframboise hints at, then how does she explain the presence of well known climate science sceptics such as William Kininmonth, Ross McKitrick and Stephen McIntyre who were all given roles as «expert reviewers» in the last IPCC report?

The university is known for its ties to Lord Lawson's climate sceptic charity, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF).

This should raise questions about exactly what it is that Lewandowsky is trying to achieve through the use of dubious statistical methods, and his attempt to understand the minds of climate sceptics: is the point to advance understanding and knowledge, or is it a strategic move in a political battle that there can be no doubt he has taken a stand in.

Second, a much more simple method — averaging — show that, no matter what the slight statistical tendency of sceptics is, on aggregate, there is no clear line dividing lunatic sceptics from the enlightened climate scientists and their disciples.

I totally agree Jennifer; when the issue theme was «Global Warming» sceptics said NO, the climate is always changing.

Most, (the vast majority BTW) sceptics I know aren't sceptical about humans causing climate change at all.

It's very reassuring to know how the very average alarmist has such a good grip on climate «problems» whereas the expert sceptic.......

All sceptics I know have the position that the warming is not unprecedented, and is largely due to natural climate variation.

President Nicolas Sarkozy's desire to appoint an outspoken climate - change sceptic to a new French super-ministry of industry and innovation has drawn strong protests from party colleagues and environmentalists... Putting him in charge of scientific research would be tantamount to «giving the finger to scientists», said Nicolas Hulot, France's best - known environmental activist.

Nonetheless, prominent environmental activists like Monbiot and Oreskes — who, given their academic positions, ought to know better — maintain the image of the evil tobacco lobby in order to «link» its modus operandi to climate sceptics.

The close association between climate alarmists and the insurance industry is no less natural than that between «sceptics» and Exxon.

That «KILL» headline has been gleefully snapped up by hordes of conservative, business - oriented, pro-tarsands and pro-Keystone climate change sceptics and deniers here in Canada, most of whom know nothing about you or your work or the work of thousands of your fellow scientists who have contributed to IPCC reports.

In any case, while Muller was and remains a scientific sceptic, he's no longer a climate sceptic.

If you must know, it was the shady scientific practices and the uncertainty in climate science, as revealed in the East Anglia emails, that finally tipped me over to the sceptics» side.