Sentences with phrase «known dangerous conditions on the property»

The landowner, property manager, landlord, tenant, occupant, etc. breached their legal duty to the injured party (typically by failing to keep the premises reasonably safe and / or to warn of any known dangerous conditions on the property, or failing to investigate the potential for dangerous conditions in a commercial setting)

The landowner, property manager, landlord, tenant, occupant, etc. owed a legal duty to the injured party (typically, a duty to keep the premises reasonably safe and / or to warn of any known dangerous conditions on the property, as well as a duty to investigate the potential for dangerous conditions in a commercial setting)

Though trespassers have few legal rights since generally they are on the property unlawfully, this does not mean that a trespasser can not have a successful legal action if there was a known dangerous condition on the property that should have been remedied.

Not exact matches

Property owners are responsible for injuries that occur as a result of a dangerous or hazardous condition on their property, which the owner knew about, or should have knowProperty owners are responsible for injuries that occur as a result of a dangerous or hazardous condition on their property, which the owner knew about, or should have knowproperty, which the owner knew about, or should have known about.

When you get hurt on someone else's property, it might be because of dangerous conditions that were allowed to exist even though they were known about by the party responsible for the property.

Essentially, under Florida negligent security law, a crime victim can obtain money damages from the defendant if he or she can provide sufficient evidence that there was (1) a dangerous condition on the property and (2) the defendant knew — or reasonably should have known about it but (3) he or she did not take reasonable steps to make the place safe or at least minimize the danger and (4) as a result, the plaintiff was hurt.

You must be able to prove that the owner of the property knew, or should have known, that there was a dangerous condition on his property and did not act to lessen the danger.

Negligence can be shown if the injuries were caused by a dangerous condition on the property that the landowner created, knew about, or should have known about in the exercise of reasonable care and inspection.

Additionally, if the owner or property maintainer knows that there is a dangerous condition on the property, they may avoid liability by providing warning to guests.

It comes down to whether there was a «dangerous condition» on the property that the property owner should have known about, and that a «reasonable property owner» would have found and fixed before anyone could get hurt.

Plaintiff alleged premises liability for negligence in failure to address a potentially dangerous condition on the property (i.e., lack of protective features around the rear of the cabana that abuts a curve around which drivers were known to speed).

This is generally applicable if the property owner knew of a dangerous condition on the property and did nothing to fix it and did not warn others of the potential hazard.

A property owner or occupier has a duty to warn licensees of dangerous conditions on the property that create an unreasonable risk of harm if the property owner or occupier knows about the condition and it is not likely to be discovered by the licensee.

Owners or occupiers of property are obligated to protect persons lawfully on their property from injuries caused by dangerous conditions that the owner or occupier was aware of or should have known existed.

«It also is well settled in our jurisprudence that there is an affirmative duty on owners and possessors of property: «to exercise reasonable care for the safety of persons reasonably expected to be on the premises * * * includ [ing] an obligation to protect against the risks of a dangerous condition existing on the premises, provided the landowner knows of, or by the exercise of reasonable care would have discovered, the dangerous condition.»

Regardless of who is liable, in order to establish a premises liability claim there must be some evidence of a defect or a dangerous condition on the property that caused the injury, and evidence that the property owner should have known of the dangerous condition.