A landowner owes a duty to licenses to refrain from wanton negligence or willful misconduct and to warn the licensee of
a known dangerous defect or condition that is not obvious.
Not exact matches
«Dr Mandelin6 says that while some medications are
known to be too
dangerous to use during pregnancy (Trexall ® [methotrexate], for example, is often prescribed for psoriasis but can potentially cause birth
defects), other treatments are safe and can provide symptom relief both when a woman is expecting and during breastfeeding.»
The plaintiff alleged that the landowner allowed a defective,
dangerous, and unsafe condition to exist,
knew or reasonably should have
known of the presence of the
defect, and failed to repair it in a timely manner or warn others of the
defect.
At Altman & Altman, LLP we
know how devastating it is to find out that your son or daughter was born with serious birth
defects because of a
dangerous drug.
Even if they are unaware of any issues, it can still be considered negligence if the owner had constructive notice of, or should have
known of, a
dangerous condition or
defect.
Sometimes a water park may not
know that its water slides and other water attractions contain
dangerous defects.
Their
dangerous drug complaint contends that GSK should have
known these risks were involved with its drug but failed to warn about the birth
defects.
Regardless of who is liable, in order to establish a premises liability claim there must be some evidence of a
defect or a
dangerous condition on the property that caused the injury, and evidence that the property owner should have
known of the
dangerous condition.