Sentences with phrase «known entity in»

Buterin, unlike Satoshi, is a known entity in the crypto community, and the degree of influence he has over the Ethereum community leads to frequent comparisons of his role to that of a «benevolent dictator.»

The company isn't a known entity in the US, but that won't stop it from releasing new phones.

Farmers Insurance is a well known entity in the insurance business and is the supplier for over 15 million consumers, making it the third largest provider in the US.

Sheridan himself is also a known entity in industry circles.

It affords us the gift of agency — to dream up the impossible, to create new realities, and to push limits that no known entity in the universe can even come close to emulating.

Not exact matches

According to the Pentagon's June 2017 Enhancing Security and Stability in Afghanistan report, «Haqqani and Taliban integration has become so robust that many observers no longer look at them as separate entities, but as factions within the same group.»

Regardless of the ridiculousness of his claims, media entities felt they had to entertain them in order to disprove them, and in the process got trapped in the quagmire known as «false equivalence.»

Known more for his humanitarian work outside music, Bono has invested in several emerging companies through an entity called Elevation Partners.

«If we are not tied for first, then the person who is in first, or the entity that's in first, then rolls out a ride - sharing network that is far cheaper or far higher - quality than Uber's, then Uber is no longer a thing,» Kalanick told Business Insider in August 2016.

Both said in filings: «The company knows or has reasonable cause to believe that there is no registrable person or registrable relevant legal entity in relation to the company.»

Vascepa, known in scientific literature as AMR101, has been designated a new chemical entity by the FDA.

In the past, trolls, also known as «patent assertion entities» (PAEs), were mostly viewed as a problem for the software industry.

On the wider app audit that Facebook has committed to carrying out in the wake of the scandal, Schroepfer was also asked how it can audit apps or entities that are no longer on the platform — and he admitted this is «a challenge» and said Facebook won't have «perfect information or detail».

All investors know that buying stock entitles them to partial ownership in the corporate entity issuing those shares.

Galvin said in releasing the policy statement that «entities that create computer - generated portfolios but fail to do the necessary customer due diligence to know their customers and who specifically decline most if not all the fiduciary duty are not performing the duties of investment advisors.»

Jackson argued in his post that Yahoo no longer made sense as an independent entity.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this posin the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this posin risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this posIn other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

The «invisible» entity known at the Deep State is the ruling body in the U.S.

3G is known for running lean and they promptly stripped out $ 1.7 billion in annual spending from the combined entities.

Foreign companies no longer need to have a legal entity established in China or Hong Kong in order to open a renminbi account with PNC.

In the old testament God is an insane, vengeful, jealous, murdering entity that makes Christianity seem violent, bloody and insane... just as the Muslim faith appears to people who know nothing about it.

That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loin my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loin a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loin many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loIN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll

4 It is significant that in Whitehead's Metaphysics Leclerc has stated, without textual support from Whitehead, that for Whitehead past entities do not «exist in the full sense of «exist», and... are no longer properly «actual» (p. 109).

Here I found in Newman a gentle guide, one who understood that the faith had been delivered definitively to the Church, yet who knew that the Church was a historical entity developing through time.

As the tradition developed, this acute observation is lost, because the tradition is no longer regarded as arising naturally from observation of life but as existing as a mysterious and powerful entity in its own right.

But at the chemical level, we may not even be able to know that or what an entity is, in isolation, let alone its behavior.

This limitation is by no means evident in terms of the ontological principle as we know it from Process and Reality, but it was very real in terms of the ontological principle Whitehead was then working with: «That every condition to which the process of becoming conforms in any particular instance has its reason in the character of some actual entity whose objectification is one of the components entering into the particular instance in question» (EWM 323f).

This difficulty would however be mitigated if we could say (as Whitehead himself however nowhere does, as far as I know) that it is not actual entities which are objectively immortal in the constitution of other actual entities, but the characters, or forms of their experience which are reproduced» (op.

I do not know why Whiteheadians should object (PS 6:219) to this monistic theme, since they are committed to think in terms of a God who supplies the initial subjective aim of each actual entity, and of the completion of the development of the actual entity by «the final reaction of the self - creative unity of the universe» (PR 75 — italics supplied).

I am not sure that there is an easily identified entity that amounts to «the theology of Joseph Ratzinger» in quite the same sense that there are entities known as «the theology of» Karl Barth or Karl Rahner, and I say this knowing full well that on a shelf beside me is an excellent volume by Aidan Nichols titled The Theology of Joseph Ratzinger: An Introductory Study.

The conclusion I want to pull out of these considerations is this: if there is at least one actual entity in the world characterized by at least one eternal object, one specific form of definiteness, then this actual entity provides all the ontological ground required for the realm of eternal objects — an appeal to God is not necessary.11 And, indeed, in Whitehead, as in Aristotle, there is an eternity and an abeternity of becoming so that within the terms of the system it is inconceivable that there be any region of the extensive continuum, no matter how far it be extended fore or aft, where there is not a generation of actual entities exhibiting concrete forms of definiteness.

This is the Beautiful Beyond that is now not an invisible separated entity, but observable, experienced and known in the love between all beings.

At the one extreme lies the superconduction of the field at absolute zero temperature; at the other, the lack of radiation in a field of «black hole» entities with infinite density (so that they no longer exert even gravitational influence mutually).

While the objectified facts are invested with a certain levity, no longer fully sedimented, the logical subjects as an indicative system, on the other hand, restrict the freedom of the proposition to apply to any actual entity in absolute generality.

Then God's act in revealing himself is no longer an encounter between the divine Person and the human person, but an act worked upon a purely passive entity that insight equally well be a dog or a stone.

Since it may be the case (we do not know) that some elements or entities in the world have been utterly evil, no place can be found for them in the divine life of love.

My conviction about the omniscience of God is that He knows exactly every event in the universe that has occurred, that is occurring and that will ever occur, whether the event relates to me or to any other entity in the universe.

The national state as we know it — the largest formal political entity developed to date — grew up in the past three centuries.

But Descartes asserts one principle which is the basis of all philosophy: he holds that the whole pyramid of knowledge is based upon the immediate operation of knowing which is either an essential [for Descartes], or a contributory, element in the composition of an immediate actual entity.

there's really no room for the concept of an independent entity possessed of «will» in a worldview shaped by cause and effect; the only place for «will» to retreat to is the zone of true randomness, of complete uncertainty, which means that truly free will as such must be completely inscrutible [sic]... Statistical laws govern the decay of a block of uranium, but whether or not this atom of uranium chooses to fission in this instant is a completely unpredictable event — fundamentally unpredictable, something which simply can not be known — which is equally good evidence for the proposition that it's God's (or the atom's) will whether it splits or remains whole, as for the proposition that it's random chance.

He argues that God»... is not «omnipotent» in the Thomistic sense, as the power effectively to choose that any possible world, no matter which, shall be actual «7 The reason that God does not have this power is that each actual occasion is a creative entity which, within limits, determines itself.

No, says Hartshorne; before Shakespeare actually existed, there was simply no entity Shakespeare to which «possible» or «impossible» (or any other predicate) could attach, the definiteness of Shakespeare being a creation added to antecedent reality and not present in it.

In short, the Nature we know from modern science embodies and reflects immaterial properties and a depth of intelligibility... To view all these extremely complex, elegant and intelligible laws, entities, properties and relations in the evolution of the universe as «brute facts» in need of no further explanation is, in the words of the great John Paul II, an «abdication of human intelligence».&raquIn short, the Nature we know from modern science embodies and reflects immaterial properties and a depth of intelligibility... To view all these extremely complex, elegant and intelligible laws, entities, properties and relations in the evolution of the universe as «brute facts» in need of no further explanation is, in the words of the great John Paul II, an «abdication of human intelligence».&raquin the evolution of the universe as «brute facts» in need of no further explanation is, in the words of the great John Paul II, an «abdication of human intelligence».&raquin need of no further explanation is, in the words of the great John Paul II, an «abdication of human intelligence».&raquin the words of the great John Paul II, an «abdication of human intelligence».»

The following is not necessarily true: «The coherently - defined properties he is said to possess are only known to be present in physical entities.»

For instance, how could God now know who «is» (from the standpoint of eternity) the fiftieth president of the United States, since there is not yet any determinate entity in either the present or the future?

For in this sense he is no different from every other actual entity.

The coherently - defined properties he is said to possess are only known to be present in physical entities.

In the third place, Hartshorne acknowledges a particularly thorny problem concerning the possibility of relations between entities in the present.2 Can not two subjects both know each other in the present and thus determine each other's reality to some extenIn the third place, Hartshorne acknowledges a particularly thorny problem concerning the possibility of relations between entities in the present.2 Can not two subjects both know each other in the present and thus determine each other's reality to some extenin the present.2 Can not two subjects both know each other in the present and thus determine each other's reality to some extenin the present and thus determine each other's reality to some extent?

My case was one in which the author, editor and reader are all known entities (in fact, they all know each other personally); the reading takes place in the exact same cultural and social context as the writing and editing; and the reader is himself a really smart guy, Ivy - league Ph.D. and all, who had spent a decade training the editor to be a certain kind of editor, with specific tools unique to the specific publication's aims.

In my judgment, this is an undesirable confusion of basic terms in Whitehead's philosophy, so that in the end one is no longer certain of what is meant either by an actual entity or by a nexuIn my judgment, this is an undesirable confusion of basic terms in Whitehead's philosophy, so that in the end one is no longer certain of what is meant either by an actual entity or by a nexuin Whitehead's philosophy, so that in the end one is no longer certain of what is meant either by an actual entity or by a nexuin the end one is no longer certain of what is meant either by an actual entity or by a nexus.