Sentences with phrase «known exposure to asbestos»

Not exact matches

Did you know that there is less evidence linking lead exposure to developmental delays in children and asbestos to cancer than there is of the short and long - term detrimental effects of spanking?

In the complaint, Silver is accused of awarding two discretionary grants, better known as «member items,» totaling $ 500,000 to a center that did research on an illness related to asbestos exposure.

The symptoms and presentation of this disease can be identical to IPF; the only difference between the two diseases is whether a patient knows about their exposure to asbestos.

Asbestosis is the name given to the lung disease developed by people with a known history of exposure to asbestos.

With spring home improvement projects come warnings about safe removal of construction and home materials made of asbestos in older homes, as exposure to this fibrous mineral is a known risk factor to the development of lung cancer and mesothelioma.

As we know, asbestos exposure takes time to manifest into a disease, decades go by following exposure before any type of disease relating to asbestos exposure is identified, we need to protect them now.

The most recent figures have identified that since 1980, 319 teachers, 205 of them since 2001, have died from Mesothelioma, a disease attributed to, and only known to be caused by exposure to asbestos.

There is only one known cause for mesothelioma — long term exposure to asbestos.

The connection to people and the personal satisfaction that comes with knowing victims who might otherwise have no voice have been helped to regain a sense of peace after or during a terrible struggle are what keep Valerie sharp and eager to relentlessly pursue justice for every client of our asbestos exposure law firm.

Attorneys were able to argue that the company knew about the dangers of asbestos exposure but did not warn the public for decades.

Companies that used asbestos have known about the link between asbestos exposure and smoking for decades but, instead of warning their workers about this extreme risk, they chose to ignore the dangers.

For example, he said, the only known way to contract the aggressive and usually fatal cancer, mesothelioma, is through exposure to asbestos fibers.

In fact, mesothelioma is even referred to as «asbestos cancer» as it's only known cause is asbestos exposure.

Exposure to asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma.

The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations had run out, but the appellate court ruled there were material fact issues regarding whether or not the plaintiff either knew, or should have known, that he had a cause of action for the injuries he suffered due to asbestos exposure.

Asbestos exposure is well known to increase greatly the risk of lung cancer.

Did you know that even brief or minimal exposure to asbestos can cause mesothelioma?

The second is a lump sum, known as «damages», which can be claimed using a solicitor from one or more of the companies or organisations responsible for the individual's exposure to asbestos.

In addition to smoking and exposure to other known carcinogens, lung cancer can occur as the result of asbestos exposure.

Because asbestos exposure is the only known cause for mesothelioma cancer, it is important to know where victims were exposed.

Dating back to the 70's, co-founding member Ron Motley was one of the first attorneys in the country to represent workers injured by the asbestos industry and to blow open the fact that the industry knew all along the health hazards of asbestos exposure.

Though the public policy behind statutes of repose is based on the policy judgment that a potential defendant should have no reasonable expectation of responsibility for injuries that occur after the passage of a number of years, the Court held that such a policy rationale does not apply to asbestos cases because: (1) the potential dangers associated with asbestos exposure were well known by 1971; and (2) the typical latency period from asbestos exposure to disease is much longer than the six - year window for filing personal injury claims under the statute of repose.

At trial, plaintiff presented evidence, in the form of expert testimony, that there is no known threshold of asbestos exposure at which mesothelioma will not occur, and thus each exposure to asbestos that the decedent experienced from laundering her father's clothes and being in proximity to brake products contributed to her total dose of asbestos and were substantial contributing factors to the causation of her mesothelioma.

The health risks posed by asbestos exposure have been known for over a century, yet companies still choose to use and produce products containing the deadly substance putting employees and consumers at risk.

Now, we all know that lung cancer and mesothelioma have a connection to asbestos exposure, but the gastrointestinal cancer link is a little less well known.

If you know someone suffering from mesothelioma or any other disease caused by asbestos exposure, do not hesitate to contact our mesothelioma lawyers» office in Conroe outside Houston.

Sokolove Law is a personal injury law firm known for its experience with lawsuits related to asbestos exposure.

However, the starting point is not usually the date of exposure to asbestos — in any event would you be likely to know that, other than that it was likely to have occurred within say a period between 1970 and 1979 when you worked at a particular workplace?

In fact «ambient» asbestos exposure where the victim is not or is no longer aware of the source of their exposure is widely believed to account for the majority of the remaining cases.