Not exact matches
The grip
fossil fuel lobby groups have on government is huge as you
know.
Right now business and
fossil fuel lobby groups have a lot of influence over politicians as we all
know.
All four organisations actively
lobby against any measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, all four are well
known for publishing disinformation concerning science in order to achieve this objective; and all four are funded by sections of the
fossil fuel industry.
A front - page article and headline on April 24 reported that the Global Climate Coalition, a group that throughout the 1990s represented industries with profits tied to
fossil fuels,
knew about the scientific consensus that greenhouse gas emissions could cause global warming but ignored it in a
lobbying and public relations campaign against efforts to curb emissions.
If he had not, how would anyone be able to determine when the larger public was genuinely swayed by skeptic scientists, and a necessity
no longer existed for PR departments of the
fossil fuel industry
lobby to stage fake bouts of «citizen concern»?
It can
no longer be understood as
lobbying funded by the
fossil fuel companies but has become linked to a populist political movement.
We
knew that behind the scenes the mighty
fossil fuel lobby was organising.
How do they
know they haven't been set up with some quack hired by the
fossil fuel lobby to spin the story?