Sentences with phrase «known in the legal context»

Your patent application (or specification, as it is known in the legal context) must explain how to make and use your invention.

Not exact matches

But how many people know what that really means in a legal context?

«When it comes to adults, we don't know long - term consequences of moderate marijuana use in the legal context, so that we can not say that we absolutely must intervene,» explained Marina Epstein, a UW research scientist and lead author of the study.

The legal test used by the Court to determine the choice of a legal basis (if there are multiple) for the signing and conclusion of international agreements is well known: the choice must rest on objective factors that are amenable to judicial review and these include the aim and content of that measure (the context also matters in relation to international agreements).

Today is a banner day for sane discussion of the medical procedure known as abortion, thanks to a plethora of articles in Tuesday's newspapers and Web sites that put the issue into legal, social and judicial context.

In the contemporary context, to include parallel cites, whether to print reports or Lexis / Westlaw citations, is to extend to commercial publishers a role in the legal process that they no longer merit or deservIn the contemporary context, to include parallel cites, whether to print reports or Lexis / Westlaw citations, is to extend to commercial publishers a role in the legal process that they no longer merit or deservin the legal process that they no longer merit or deserve.

The Claimants relied on the leading authority for legal advice privilege, Three Rivers (No. 5), in which the Court of Appeal had concluded that, in a corporate context, information gathered from an employee is no different from information obtained from third parties, even if the information is collected by or in order to be shown to a solicitor to enable fully informed advice to be given to that solicitor's client.

Without the overall context that a legal education provides, knowing what issues you should be looking for is difficult or impossible, and this is particular true in Anglo - American common law systems, where the law is embedded in an opaque network of appellate cases rather than laid out more or less completely in a carefully organized statute.

It seems to me that if legal advice obtained by one person is passed on to another person for the sake of informing that other person in confidence of legal advice which that person needs to know by reason of a sufficient common interest between them, then it would be contrary to the principle upon which all legal professional privilege is granted to say that the legal advice which was privileged in the hands of the first party should be lost when passed over in confidence to the second party, merely because it was not done in the context of pending or contemplated litigation.

OTTAWA — Previous Right to Know columns have considered the legal doctrines of «proof beyond a reasonable doubt» and «the presumption of innocence» in the context of examining the critical roles that defence lawyers and prosecutors play in our justice system.

Does anyone know of any cases where social networking sites such as Facebook or MySpace have brought legal action against a User or Users for violating the Terms of Use / Terms of Service (in the context of User (s) harassing other User (s) by means of the service).

You need our lawyers in order to know whether your claim is valid in a legal context or not.

In a Canadian context, the corporate character of the Crown serves another purpose as well: it allows the Crown of Canada, the legal person known as Her Majesty in Right of Canada, to be separate and distinct from the British Crown, the legal person known as Her Majesty in Right of the United Kingdom, while maintaining the same natural person the holder of both monarchical officeIn a Canadian context, the corporate character of the Crown serves another purpose as well: it allows the Crown of Canada, the legal person known as Her Majesty in Right of Canada, to be separate and distinct from the British Crown, the legal person known as Her Majesty in Right of the United Kingdom, while maintaining the same natural person the holder of both monarchical officein Right of Canada, to be separate and distinct from the British Crown, the legal person known as Her Majesty in Right of the United Kingdom, while maintaining the same natural person the holder of both monarchical officein Right of the United Kingdom, while maintaining the same natural person the holder of both monarchical offices.

In this context, I am concerned that the Australian Government and the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee did not provide adequate analysis to support their finding that the Amendment Bill (No 2) is a special measure.

But how many people know what that really means in a legal context?