Sentences with phrase «known nature of reality»

It is almost a given that children should be taught the known nature of reality.

Not exact matches

In sharp contrast to some religious proponents of «deep ecology» who betray a monistic passion to subsume all of reality into a conceptual tapioca pudding of undifferentiated Oneness, we know that neither we nor nature is God.

But his less - known work, a trilogy of science fiction novels, contains some of his most profound, thrilling and decidedly adult notions of the universe we live in, the reality - shifting nature of grace and the Creator who rules over it all.

According to Hans Jonas, the birth of modern science was bound up with the advent of a radical new view of reality, a «technological ontology» that conflates nature and artifice, knowing and making, truth and utility.

They're showing you why your religion is wrong, which can be subjectively shown to be inaccurate, silly and not consistent with reality and the nature of the universe as we know it today.

Sigurd Daecke finds anthropocentrism to be deeply embedded in Protestant theologies of creation reaching back to Luther («I believe that God has created me») and Calvin (nature is the stage for salvation history) and finding a twentieth - century home in the humanistic individualism of Bultmann as well as the Christocentrism of Barth («the reality of creation is known in Jesus Christ»)(see Daecke).

They knew that suffering suffuses nature, just as they knew the harsh realities of defeat and captivity.

This explanation has the virtue that it avoid having to look hard at the nature of reality» No, not before a test, I never mentioned that.

With the philosophy of Rene Descartes (1596 - 1650), the nature of reality was no longer seen as writ large over the universe only to be discovered by the exercise of reason but rather was what the human mind perceived, interpreted, made it to be («Cogito, ergo sum.

«In those times, we knew about things that have become common today: the reality of abortion, of people who manifest homosexual tendencies, whose personal dignity we always respected, but we were formed to see these acts as absolutely unacceptable, against the nature that God had created for us.»

Both offer large scale systematic accounts of the nature of reality in general, largely dismissing the suggestion that the only world we can know is one whose main structure is determined by the human cognitive system and which, therefore, only exists for us.

The realization of the crucial significance of relations between persons, and of the fundamentally social nature of reality is the necessary, saving corrective of the dominance of our age by the scientific way of thinking, the results of which, as we know, may involve us in universal destruction, and by the technical mastery of things, which threatens man with the no less serious fate of dehumanization.

There are differences, thirdly, as to the nature of the object — whether it is material reality, thought in the mind of God or man, pantheistic spiritual substance, absolute and eternal mystical Being, or simply something which we can not know in itself but upon which we project our ordered thought categories of space, time, and causation.

Through Israel's failures — stiff - neckedness --- we can come to know the reality of human history and the nature of the universal God.

However, the Church's theological discourse can not be so intimately bound to any one scientific theory, as «the final way» to explain something, that it becomes difficult to separate itself from such a theory, either because a theological doctrine itself can no longer be explained without it (which it can) or because a scientific theory has been superseded by a more coherent scientific theory (better able to explain reality) as is the nature of progress in science.There is a precedent for this in the Galileo controversy from the 1600s.

It is one thing to acknowledge the perspectival and paradigm - dependent nature of all human knowing; it is another thing entirely to embrace multiple realities or ontological subjectivism.

It would at least prompt the question whether this «nature» were not simply the a priori structure of the knowing subject's cognition, having nothing at all to do with «reality in itself».

But he is not made known as Son of God in reality until he is established in power, until it becomes clear that such a character of trust and loyalty is indeed in complete harmony with the nature of things.

According to Murdoch, the thoughtful modern person can no longer conceive of men and women as rational creatures who are slowly expunging evil from their midst; instead, it is necessary to think of human beings as «benighted creatures sunk in a reality whose nature we are constantly and overwhelmingly tempted to deform by fantasy.»

Few will deny, for example, that Paul's theology represents with something approaching adequacy the fact and meaning of sin in human life — the reality of moral evil, the universal blight it brings, man's hopeless entanglement with it, the perverse and rebellious pride, deep in our nature, which degrades us, distorts our efforts, mars even our best moral achievements, and from which we know God must save us if we are to be saved at all.

No longer in contact with the created world or with himself, out of touch with the reality of nature, he lives in the world of collective obsessions, the world of systems and fictions with which modern man has surrounded himself.

Teilhard's imagery here implies the well - known reality of quantitative change, incremental in nature, ultimately producing qualitative changes, which seem to appear relatively instantaneously.

Expulsion of the human subject from nature is implied in the scientific method of knowing which puritanically (one is tempted to say Gnostically) segregates the human knower from nature, and in the materialism, mechanism, or «hard naturalism,» which follows from a severe logical divorce of physical reality from mental reality.

On a more metaphysically fundamental level, Whitehead's «philosophy of organism also regards knowing as a special case of the «bipolar» nature of all becoming, whereby the direct «physical» response to objective reality is partially transformed by «mental» functioning in the realization of a novel subjective experience.

He taught that we know the reality and nature of God only as God reveals Godself to us in Jesus Christ.

= > that conclusion is the result of a naturalism world view knowing only cold hard realities of nature and life that is without soul or hope.

The ability of human genius to ponder the nature of reality in its simplicity and its majesty is what these great minds have strived to make known to humanity.

Religious symbolism pointing to some ultimate context of cosmic significance, to a ground of meaning and love, to a comprehensive preservative care, is at least not incompatible with what we now know about the logic of emergence and he nature of physical reality.

It seems to undermine everything we think we know about how the universe works, and calls into question the very nature of reality itself.

living a life of delusion is AWESOME until REALITY BIOTCH slaps you in the face and pops the sheltered bubble of the priveledged happy life you live and heaps misery onto you and your loved ones and all you can do / say / think is... god has a plan... yup a plan to make you suffer for a reason you can't understand... from my VAST knowledge of the world and human nature i know how to make choices that avoid MOST of the misery and suffering the rest of you shlubs endure, can't avoid everything, but instead of wasting time with religious b and s i think about avoiding misery and suffering... 35 years and so far sooooooo goooood...

Christ as we know Him is so related to God that we use of Him the words, «of one substance with the Father»; which is to say that the very same stuff, the very same reality, is in Christ as characterizes the nature of God our Creator.

They knew Him as alive from the dead, in the full integrity of His human nature as also in the full reality of His divine nature.

To examine and display what we truly know (and what we don't) about the entirety of nature, we turn to a tried - and - true approach — the simple premise of a 10-fold zooming view to tour the universe, from the edge of the observable cosmos to the innermost knots of reality.

He wanted to know why quantum physics ruled the universe, why the mysterious fuzziness of nature at its most basic gave rise to the rock - solid reality presented to human senses.

In Beyond Biocentrism, acclaimed biologist Robert Lanza, one of TIME Magazine's 100 Most Influential People in 2014, and leading astronomer Bob Berman, take the reader on an intellectual thrill - ride as they re-examine everything we thought we knew about life, death, the universe and the nature of reality itself.

In this book, Lanza and Berman take the reader on yet another intellectual thrill - ride as they re-examine everything we believed we knew about life, death, the universe, and the nature of reality itself.

In this new book, Lanza and Berman take the reader on yet another intellectual and thrilling journey as they re-examine everything we once thought we knew about life, death, the universe, and the nature of reality itself.

Relatively few people, black or white, who know anything about the reality of race relations in America during the 1950s would contest the revolutionary nature of the Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education.

When their home is destroyed, the outcasts must join a volatile group of their peers on a journey that threatens to strip them of everything they cherish, imperil everything they've ever known, even force them to question the nature of reality itself.

Fearing the paranoic religious nature of some US consumers and trying to make the IP appealing to them, SEGA of America decided to make more changes for the localized port on the SEGA Genesis adding Sonic the Hedgehog characters, that's right, what you once knew as «Dr. Robotnik's Mean Bean Machine» is Puyo at heart in reality.

Towards the end of her catalogue essay about the exhibition, Thomas writes «With the introduction of virtual dimensions, of multifold visual realities, we can no longer assume a reality to which our sense of self corresponds and it is left to the artist to interrogate the nature of reality.»

If we accept this assertion, abstract sculpture may also represent realities of life in space, in the ocean, in rock formations, in forms of nature, or in anything that connects us with life as we know it — not just human or animal forms, faces, plants, scenes, portraits, etc..

Using a variety of abstract images, they no longer focus on individual phenomena of reality, but rather on «the whole of nature».

Lots of esoteric talk about science and its nature, but I can't help but think that the interpreters» and pigeon - holers» efforts are no more than an attempt to try to describe the reality of scientific practice in academically discussable ways.

These graphs also illustrate that the process of science is not a list of known facts but an ongoing search for the truth in the reality of nature.

For decades, they knew the reality of the addictive nature of nicotine and the carcinogenic effects of tobacco use.

The reality is that it's of the same formal and professional nature as the resume and for effective cover letter writing you have to comprehensively know the structure and format to succeed.

This piece of worthless garbage (the SPIS) is nothing more than a smoke - screen vehicle to be adopted by sellers (whether honest or dishonest in nature, not to mention their ignorance of the state of their own properties) in pursuit of facilitating smooth sales whereby sales would be more difficult to achieve without the supposed «feel good» SPIS boxes being initialed «yes» or «no», as the case may be, reflecting the negative reality, or positive unreality, as the case may be, of the condition / hidden defects of the said listed properties.