Sentences with phrase «known other couples»

I have worked with couples where it lasted only a few weeks before the power struggle emerged and have known other couples where it lasted 2 - 3 years.

We've only known each other a couple of months, but I already consider her to be such a genuine and sweet friend.

My husband said he liked getting to know the other couples.

Not exact matches

While other couples we knew spent their honeymoons arguing about directions and which side of the road to drive on, my husband and I were enjoying a boat trip through the Balearic Sea in peace and quiet.

If I sort of get the sense during our meeting that their expectations are not quite jibing with how I work or my style, then I will be very up - front and honest with them, and say, «I don't know if this is the best fit, but here are a couple of other planners that might be a good option for you.»

Let that person know that you're hyperfocused on a couple of things in your life and trying to reduce your obligations in all other areas.

«I was working in L.A. and was just being a bum with the guys who were on «The Hills» and a couple of others who knew them,» Taylor said.

In an interview with the Tribune, Liautaud said that he and Aronson got to know each other over a couple of years and came to an agreement.

By transferring my money to a couple brokerage accounts and two other banks as soon as it hits my main bank I no longer have temptation to spend on frivolous things.

But others like my wife, brother, and a couple others I know say they have to be careful what they eat and very aware of where the bathrooms are.

This is one of the reasons why artificialcontraception has had such damage upon marriages and relationships: the couple deliberately withhold their fertility and so no longer give themselves completely to each other; in doing this they deny not just the meaning of sex itself but they also subtract from loving one of its «givens» - the orientation towards giving oneself completely to one's spouse.

I personally know many wives in a situation similar to mine, but I only know one other couple who lives openly amongst friends as my husband and I do.

The couple is seated with a screen separating them so that they can not see each other while his feet are washed in a bronze thaali with raw milk by the bride's brother and is known as Paon Dhulai.

When you avail yourself of benefits that others couples can not have you are no longer benefitting from your supposed god's law.

Yo moron they use that same tactic today straight men rape other men to show their dominance it has nothing to do with the loving respectful long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

The point of the present analysis is that divorce ought not to be accepted as a normal and proper practice, for the benefit of couples who no longer satisfy each other.

A couple in their late sixties likened their current stage to their courtship days, but with the added joys of having learned to know each other fully through forty years of shared experiences.

That was the dilemma after praying and seeking the Lord he shows me a couple of things one is God calls the shots not satan satans demons bow to Gods authority and must get his permission so they beg Jesus to send the demons into the pigs.Jesus allows it so we can see satans purpose is always to destroy life.God is still the same yesterday today and forever he is the giver of life.We do know that the pigs were owned by the gentile nations and may well have been offered or about to be offered to there gods which would mean they would belong to satan.Like the example Jesus said about taxes should he pay them and he said give to caesar what is caesars.Or the other option was that it showed Gods mercy to the man that had been healed by delivering him of the demons and he was also protecting the people in the area from the influence of the demons.So God is still the same he is unchangeable and definitely not bipolar.I would say if anyone was bipolar in this situation it is David and he like us struggled with the same choice to walk according to the flesh or walk according to the spirit of God.brentnz

I don't know about this couple or any other people in this forum, but when people express that I'm not welcomed, I usually go my own way in the other direction.

In precisely the same way, the justices could press counsel to get clear on the principled lines of a judgment that would confer the right to marriage on couples of the same - sex, while barring the extension of marriage to all of these other ensembles, who will be in the courts before long, demanding to know why they too are not eligible for the same constitutional rights.

(5) Couples frequently have difficulty when they assume that the other knows or should know

i don't know about you but a book written even a couple hundred years ago is useless and beyond outdated unless it was on the cosmos, mathematics, or geometry... oh and fairy tales such as canterbury, grimm, aesop, amoungst others, they carry moral lessons for society... and the bible, do we see a pattern here?

A special kind of knowing «in Christ» can occur when a couple is drawn closer to God's mysterious, ineffable love through their love for each other.

«That said, if the churches do not take the opportunity now to «advocate» and «teach» why same - sex marriage is wrong for everyone (i.e., harmful to children, to the couple, and undermining of a culture of marriage), religious people should not expect to find a lot of sympathy for their right to exercise their religious freedom to dissent from same - sex marriage,» Esbeck told CT. «In other words, church leaders no longer enjoy the luxury of not teaching biblical marriage, as much as large numbers of the laity don't want to hear it.

Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour of the world: In Adam all die even so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are of Christ: The false Christ comes up along side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started of in the truth, but went out from the Word of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

you would think that based on the prejudice and idea that blacks no longer marry each other or bother to get married at all but just have babies that an all white church would have jumped at the opportunity to not only marry the couple but comment on what a great example they were setting for all the other blacks who just have babies with no stable households — or something like that.

I agree with the other poster you took the cowardly way out it you are truly gay, because nowhere in the bible does your god condemn the saved loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

And the same should go for anyone who says they are saved if they are sinning and letting everyone know it, which includes all sexual immorality, including having sex before a couple is married, drunkards, slanderers, gossips, thieves, swindlers, idolators, adulterers, and men who have sex with other men, etc... So ultimately, many Jesus followers accept certain sin of all types because they care more about what the world thinks, than what God thinks.

I could see a couple sitting there that just wanted to talk and get to know each other.

Get it out of the way, so by the time you hit your stride at 32, 34, you know, hey, I'm not good at all that other stuff but I've found a couple of things that I'm pretty good at.

Dr. Lehman leaves no doubt as to the extent that God wants married couples to completely give themselves to each other.

You may find it useful to discuss the problems in the relationships of the three couples described in this chapter, comparing them with your own and with other couples you know.

Church member Casey Kitchens said she and other members of the congregation are outraged by the church's refusal to marry a black couple, a decision she says most of the congregation knew nothing about.

I know many gay couples in that situation, and many others who wouldn't even consider a church like that out of respect for their own relationship.

While Valentine's Day is traditionally known as the time of year when couples swoon over each other, it's really just a holiday about love.

3, there were a couple ingredients that others commented about adding, and they all just sounded delicious, but I really don't know what they are.

Just letting you know I am featuring this recipe today on Slow Cooker from Scratch, along with a couple of your other Paleo slow cooker recipes.

Have you ever known a couple that you never would have thought of for each other but it turns out they're absolutely perfect together?

So on our first date in the kitchen, I said, «Let's start with a couple of easy recipes so we can enjoy ourselves and get to know each other a bit more.

Coupling that with a recent Nielsen report on global trust in advertising, which stated that 92 % of consumers trust recommendations from people they know over any other form of advertising, reveals the significance of being an America's Most Recommended brand by women.

With over 300 career appearances under his belt coupled with four Ligue 1 titles and a whole host of other domestic trophies, Verratti knows what it takes to win.

These two squads know each other very well and have met numerous times in the past couple of years during various Hoops Leagues..

Like many others it will take a couple weeks to work the kinks out but knowing their Captain, expect that to happen sooner rather than later.

I did not like it when you said «I know you are not an Arsenal fan» just because he has comments you didn't like... We moan not because we lost a single match or a couple of matches rather than the system runs this club... Wenger is the arrowhead of the system, didn't he say he has a strong say of how things running in this club... We see moaning and raising banners and chants toward the board and the manager might have a positive effect, you see it the other way, that's all... BTW I like your reply this time...

The truth is he may not know the real answer for a couple of months even if he makes a public statement one way or the other.

But Toronto was thoroughly better than Boston last season, both in the regular season (actually challenging for the No. 1 seed, eight games ahead of Boston and three other teams) and in the playoffs (where the Raptors, you know, won a couple of series).

Ideally, the «clinch» should last no longer than a couple of seconds, as children may be watching, but we understand that the arrival of other players may unavoidably extend this process.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

No one is questioning Wenger's past achievements, but he has had three seasons and 5 transfer windows to get the necessary players i.e a top sttiker and a dm which are glaring deficiencies in our squad and yet he ignores it and this summer was an example of how delusional he has become, by making statements like there no players available which could improve our squad, while treble winner barca even with their transfer ban get couple in, same with Bayern, Madrid and all other big clubs because they know you have constantly improve their squads to compete, and by making that statement he implied that he has one of the best sqauds in Europe, so can you please tell me whether you are optimistic about our chances against Bayern?

Bordogna claimed that four other judges had also found the music inappropriate, but had «disguised» their disapproval by giving the couple low scores on the first night, knowing Blumberg and Seibert would be skating to Scheherazade two evenings later.