Sentences with phrase «known sceptic»

That's from WUWT, a well known sceptic site and is therefore irrelevant» (the same same people will then point to RC and claim it's a good source!)

In fact, astronaut Harrison Schmitt — who actually stood on the moon, drilled holes, collected moon rocks, and has since returned to Earth — is a well - known sceptic of anthropogenic global warming.

Viscount Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, a well - known sceptic of man made global warming theory, has made a complaint to the police over a prize - winning art work which he describes as a «death threat.»

The Deputy Leader of UKIP Lord Monckton of Brenchley, a well known sceptic on climate change, wrote to the Telegraph today saying of the prince:

Kanwal Rekhi, co-founder and managing director at VC firm Inventus Capital Partners, has been a known sceptic of the capital - intensive...

A known sceptic of human - induced climate change, advocate of fossil fuels, and critic of several government - run climate programs, the ex governor of Texas» nomination have many involved parties worried.

In a 2003 email, Mann discusses encouraging colleagues to «no longer submit [papers] to, or cite papers in» Climate Research, after it published papers by known sceptics «that couldn't get published in a reputable journal».

I have no doubt many well - known sceptics warrant JQ's description.

Not exact matches

But sceptics say the mechanism is an unregulated way for struggling startups to raise money from investors who might not know any better.

EVERYTHING I make from your recipes turn out perfectly My friends (you know those omnivorous — vegan sceptic types) can not believe the food I now create and thanks to you I pull off a mean dinner party.

It is well - known that British public opinion is more euro - sceptic than europhile.

Moreover, he knew that we might win and did not want the embarrassment of being forced by Europe to legislate equal marriage, which would have been used against him by Euro - sceptics in his own party — and by UKIP.

Always known as a Corbyn - sceptic, he releases a statement saying he believes it is «time for the party to unite behind a new leader» and serve as an «effective opposition».

Kennedy would not have legitimised what he knew was a toxic brand, nor played second fiddle in a government whose pro-austerity, anti-welfare, Euro - sceptic trajectory he so distrusted.

The EU scepticism of Social Democrats of Tom Harris, David Owen, have known not to merge with the Libdems, having not voted for Labours manifesto to leave the EU in 1983, finding they have more in Common with Centrist Brexit Labour MPs such as John Cryer, just as EU sceptic Labour MPs Gisela Staurt and Kate Hoey have common ground with those M.P.s loyal to the party, Angela Eagle, Andy Burnham and Louisiana Berger.

One of the authors, Willie Soon, is a well - known climate sceptic.

It's hard to know just how far this view has seeped into mainstream climate scepticism, but the themes of corrupt science and cheating and lying climate scientists are widely disseminated on sceptic blogs and other outlets.

To blur the lines between what we know and what we believe, Hill focuses on a story of a sceptic and a spiritualist.

CEO Satya Nadella is a known Xbox sceptic, so I think it's not too far fetched that Xbox is basically constantly fighting for recocnition and money within the whole company.

In fact I want to know how to answer to the sceptics arguments concerning the saturation of IR absorption in CO2 bandths.

I'm researching the sceptics view of climate change for an international engineering firm that needs to know more about how this issue will affect us... I've got the IPCC report and other things that support anthropogenic climate change, but I need to address the other side of the argument as well, especially for a group of conservative engineers.

Even if this paper concerns the sink and not the sources the same sceptics can say that we must know all the fluxes to make a correct CO2 balance.

You know the satellite temperatures the sceptics say are all important.

And even when talking to the more scientifically literate objectors, it is often then difficult to separate the genuine sceptics from the cynics who will never be convinced no matter what.

They discuss an even higher solar influence, listing well - known and antiquated sceptic's arguments as the overestimation of 20th century warming due to heat - island effects, or the lower trends in satellite observations.

The only scientific society I know of that actually made an attempt to consider and judge the evidence was the American Physical Society - I suspect as a result of intense lobbying by sceptics within the society who argued that the usual approach was unscientific and hurt their credibility.

Sometimes the sceptics are no better at explaining themselves than the believers are.

(I know, I get the sceptics» e-mails.)

I am a sceptic and did not know of, and because of that fact, participate in the survey.

Michaels is a well known climate sceptic who has revealed that he receives around 40 % of his funding from the oil industry.

I know that SBC is editor of EE and I know she is a CC sceptic.

I'm a sceptic, did not take part in Lew survey, and didn't even know about it until the recent discussions.

I am a sceptic, I did not know about the survey until the results were first publicised and I certainly did not participate in it.

That's an argument than even deeply non-technical non-scientists of the general public (and Congress / Senate) can understand - part of their «figuring out who knows what about science» mental toolkit that Dan so admires - which is probably why climate science communicators on the sceptic side are so keen to communicate it.

I have extensively read scientist Mike Hulme's presentation of climate change as PNS, but do you know of any other alarmist or sceptic scientists calling it as PNS?

Alas if you were a sceptic there was almost nothing he could have said to start your cognitive dissonance wobbling — coz you already know don't you?

But they do know that explaining what the consensus is, and what sceptics» arguments are, would be to give a hostage to fortune.

When warmists started calling sceptics denialists, I immediately knew that they're projecting — they were the ones who denied climate change.

The facts were plain: the journalists didn't know what the consensus was, nor what the argument of the sceptics was, and so they didn't notice that the putative sceptics» arguments were not in fact outside of the consensus at all.

No, I don't think all sceptics are the same (as I pointed out at 1.44 pm).

As you know, I often argue with climate sceptics too.

In the early 1990s, a group of sceptics claimed that Roger Revelle, one of the first climate scientists, had changed his mind about global warming and no longer believed it was a serious problem.

So when you then add «I came to this blog seriously hoping that there was an honest climate skeptic,» I would suggest that you came here with the intent to look for any evidence, no matter how semantic, pointless or ridiculous, to reinforce your view that all sceptics are «dishonest.»

The truth will eventually be known by everyone, not just the sceptics.

Many senior scientists are no better; even Lord Rees, President of the Royal Society, recently referred to climate sceptics as «village idiots».

The programme featured scientists known as climate sceptics, such as Richard Lindzen at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Phillip Stott, emeritus professor at the University of London.

FE — you quoted C3 and C4 plants: The pages of Anton Uriarte, a well known Spanish sceptic: http://homepage.mac.com/uriarte/carbon13.html

No doubt some Home Office compter will have picked up your reference to sabotage and subversion, and even now, som obscure police force is training a mole to infiltrate our sceptic ranks.

You should know that Jo tolerates far more from visiting «warmers» than their sites do from sceptics and we've certainly had our fill of late.

Yet if this really was the conspiracy to keep out dissenting voices which Laframboise hints at, then how does she explain the presence of well known climate science sceptics such as William Kininmonth, Ross McKitrick and Stephen McIntyre who were all given roles as «expert reviewers» in the last IPCC report?