Sentences with phrase «known universe»

That number is greater than the total of every particle in the entire known universe!

Everyone knows the universe exists but no one can perceive the whole universe.

For in such an interpretation the knowing subject is no longer a part of the scientifically known universe.

Which leads me to my next question: Under what known universe does D'Antoni think that this is going to work?

«With private chains, you can have a completely known universe of transaction processors,» Masters says.

Freeman Dyson reminds us of the little old lady who confronted the scientific view of the origins of the universe with the retort that everyone knew the universe was really held in existence by being placed on the back of a giant turtle.

VoR — you are so full of it!!!! Everyone and their little brother knows the universe is 13.72 billion years old.

Astronomers know the universe became reionized because when they look out in space and back in time at the light of very distant quasars — incredibly bright objects thought to be powered by supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies — they don't see the dimming of their light that would occur through a fog of neutral hydrogen gas.

Worse than that, some of the material here is borderline racist and reinforces the wildly incorrect perception that the entire known universe revolves around what happens in the US mediaspace.

Much better then «Oh no the universe is in trouble better get Mario to save it for me!»

I hope it will be still faithful to the Frictional known universe.

This process looks like the inverted pyramid pictured below; we start with our entire known universe of stocks and end what we call the «investible universe.»

«With private chains, you can have a completely known universe of transaction processors,» Digital Asset Holdings CEO Blythe Masters said in September.

We know the universe had a beginning, but we don't know what caused it, or what if anything existed before that.

A-Gnostic means you know the universe is too big and complicated to ever know for sure if there is a god, and A-Theist means you feel sure there isn't one.

We know that, because we know the universe had a beginning (Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstien, Borg - Guth - Vilenkin).

I think everyone accepts the Weak Anthropic Principle, which basically says that since we exist we know the universe must be such that our existence is possible.

Science has never made a claim of «cause» as to the beginning of the known universe so «I don't know» is more than reasonable... it perfectly describes the state of human knowledge to this point.

The known universe as we can see it started 13.75 billion years ago, that does not rule out that the universe existed in some other form previous to that and possibly had no actual beginning.

Why are there billions of galaxies inhabiting the known universe and within those billions of stars all of which are being born and dying.

We know the universe is not eternal it had a start.

Does everyone realize how tiny a speck the Earth is in comparison to the known universe?

To the contrary, another fundamental insight of human exceptionalism holds that we alone within the known universe bear essential moral duties.

Another day of religious people refusing to notice that there is no evidence anywhere in the known universe even hinting that what they believe is true.

On esmall error in your post that I think needs to be noted — You are confusing the «known universe» with «the universe».

If we do that, we can compute the amount of energy in a cubic centimeter of space, which comes out about 1040 times the energy which would result from the disintegration of all the matter in the known universe.

I have asked about a dozen times now for you to describe the properties of a conscious enti - ty that exists above and beyond our universe and how it created the known universe and how you verified it using your superior ability of philosophy.

Does the general philosophy you seem to strongly associate yourself with, describe the properties of a conscious enti - ty that exists above and beyond our universe and how it created the known universe and how it verifies it?

If people want to suppose that our known universe had a creator of some sort, I'm fine with that.

What I really do want you to do, is to describe the properties of something that does exist above or beyond our physical universe, and how that something created the known universe, using philosophy.

What there is most certainly NOT a broad scientific consensus about is the need to invoke God or some creator in order to explain the known universe.

At least according to YOUR definition of «god» perhaps.By placing your «god» outside of the known universe, you then protect your flawed idea of a god from scrutiny, simply saying god doesn't have to play by the rules, is pure speculation in a) the existance of a «god» and b) where or how this «god» exists if not in our existance.

You are so philosophically challenged you can not describe the properties of a conscious enti - ty that exists above and beyond our universe and how it created the known universe and how you verified it using your superior ability of philosophy you keep referring to.

We're talking about statistical possibilities that are astronomically small, exceeding the number of atoms we even have in the known universe.

I mean, we use evidence from 1 trillionth of a trillionth of the known universe to try and explain the whole universe by limiting the universe to what is known.

I choose to believe that the Author of All, God the father, created the known universe and everything in it in six days, and rested on the seventh.

So far as I know the universe as a whole is in no imminent...