Sentences with phrase «known whether either man»

Within decades we will know whether man is going to be a physical success around earth, able to function in ever greater patterns of local universe, or whether he is going to frustrate his own success with his negatively conditioned reflexes of yesterday and will bring about his own extinction around the planet earth.

If the world's foremost climate scientists didn't know whether man's activities were warming or cooling the planet, how could any responsible government condone scaring its people with «descriptions of climate - related health risks»?

Not exact matches

Whether you're a man who has time for only a quick wash and shave in the morning, or you indulge in an extra cream or gel here or there, here are the shave, scrub, and soothing products you need to know about right now.

While not indicating whether he was challenging the transcript's accuracy, O'Donnell added: «What it can not convey, however, is the heart - rending image of this great man who tragically is no longer capable of managing his own affairs.»

It is not clear whether Voorhis knew the exact identity of the man.

But whether its going in a better direction, I mean the funny thing is, no matter what direction it goes, no matter how great it is, there's going to be a bunch of shmucks that are trying to like make money off of it, and it's going to repeat itself: The amount of bands that sound like various other bands that once were great... it multiplies so quick, it's pretty funny man.

While a woman can know for certain who fathered her child, a man can never be 100 % certain whether he is the biological father.

A young man with a little boy approached me to ask whether I knew the Mass time.

Render service with enthusiasm, as to the Lord and not to men and women, knowing that whatever good we do, we will receive the same again from the Lord, whether we are slaves or free.

I am saying that whether one believes we are under the law or under grace... there is still no biblical mandate of sexual abstinence outside of marriage unless one is a woman and the property of a man whose property value goes down once she is no longer a virgin.

«I understand that the writers want to create tension and resolve it, but they push it to a spot where if you haven't read Genesis, you wouldn't know whether Noah is really a man of faith or not.»

She had apparently got to the point where she honestly did not know that a child is the natural fruit of a union between a man and a woman: in her understanding «sex» is something done for pleasure, according to one's desires, whether lesbian or homosexual or whatever, and procreation an entirely different matter connected with options presented at various times, possibly involving in - vitro fertilization and test - tubes.

Naturally all the rational proofs of God's existence have to employ analogy whether they appeal to man's interior experience of knowing and loving or to his understanding of the external world.

Most memorably of all, «If you want to know the law and nothing else, you must look at it as a bad man, who cares only for the material consequences which such knowledge enables him to predict, not as a good one, who finds his reasons for conduct, whether inside the law or outside of it, in the vaguer sanctions of conscience.»

A woman is left wondering whether or not it's «OK» to dress for the beach, or yoga class (knowing a man could «stumble»).

Evidently intellectuals are no better men only because they are educated; this shows itself especially in the case of theologians, no matter whether they are priests or laymen, who have chosen theology and spirituality as their profession or even as their intellectual hobby.

Standing as a permanent sacrament of the Transfiguration, it draws forward the old city into the new and eternal city of beauty — a city in which truth, justice, and beauty embrace in God — a city on which all men and women (whether they know it or not) have already set their hearts.

In 1999, we are no longer reduced to «guessing» whether he was inspired or speaking only as a man: • adultery has lost its moral significance and become commonplace; • chastity has become a symbol of unhealthy development; • contraception in expectation of fornication is taught to children in the schools; • respect between the sexes has been replaced by mutual exploitation and / or competition; • marriage has lost its sacramental nature and its enduring promise; • statistically, divorce is common, teenage pregnancy is widespread, single parent and serially parented families increase, sexual disease is epidemic, intercourse is recreational, abortion is ubiquitous.

I heard a story about a Muslim man who wanted to eat watermelon, he didn't know whether Mohammed ate watermelon including seeds and all or discarded the seeds, so this fellow would not eat watermelon on the grounds that he couldn't be sure of the prophet's example.

Who knows whether in God» s sight a cold heart, that does not win souls and never has the anointing for power, may be more wicked than the man who is tempted and falls into drink or blasphemy or adultery!

Agnostics (regardless of whether they lean towards being religious or irreligious) are the only ones HUMBLE enough to admit that there is NO WAY OF KNOWING ANYTHING about an invisible man in the sky whom no one has ever talked to, heard from or seen... EVER!

Therefore, whether they believe and know it or not, all men eat with Jesus, and thus may render an ignorant and unconscious testimony to Jesus.

Then, too, it will presumably be possible to leave it an open question whether the history of human descent as known to us does or does not possess features which only after the Fall of the first man can be thought of to some extent as a predominance of his pre-human past and of his environment, over a sensitivity to the world around him no longer protected by the gift of integrity, and over his lack of adaptation to a particular milieu.

Philosophy does not exist, however, without the readiness of the philosophizing man to make decisions, on the basis of known truth, as to whether a thought is right or wrong, an action good or bad.

shipwreck73, Jesus warned us (Matthew 23:1 - 39) about who sat in the lead roles in the churches, synagogues, any / all false religions in the world... and specifically told us to read and study His truth (the Bible) so that we can sharpen our knowledge with those that profess to know him whether they are teaching His truth or the lies of man.

There are differences, thirdly, as to the nature of the object — whether it is material reality, thought in the mind of God or man, pantheistic spiritual substance, absolute and eternal mystical Being, or simply something which we can not know in itself but upon which we project our ordered thought categories of space, time, and causation.

I never know whether to laugh or cry when I hear of a black man converting to Islam.

It assumes that every man must know by himself better than anyone else whether he is in despair or not.

Liberalism is about individuals getting to be who they decide they most truly are, according to their own lights, whether they are women or men, gay or straight, no matter what their color, cultural background or economic status.

And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all human description, or the judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every individual among these million millions only one question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a way that thou didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a way that thou didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a way that thou, a horror to others, didst rave in despair.

Let every man and woman know, by the whispering of the Spirit of God to themselves, whether their leaders are walking in the path the Lord dictates, or not.»

Whether we know it or not, true freedom is born from the transcendence of man, hence it is freedom before and towards God.

Whether Jesus in such passages was speaking of himself or of a heavenly being known only as the Son of man, the early church was so convinced that Jesus was the Messiah that they made this identification.5 Jesus apparently believed in an imminent end of the present age.

RD.. How path - et - ic to see your hate and fear driving you to death...!?! Man pull your self together and have the courage to face the returns of your deeds... Wars were always there in life whether were religious or not so stop doing it on your self... Beside learn to wish people well whether you agree or disagree with might you succeed in life rather than being a loser... by being a cowered... My posts were meant for the friendly people I had known for some time, whom I found they were full of compassion and not for black hearted one's like you who hate all God creations...

But all this I laid to heart, examining it all, how the righteous and the wise and their deeds are in the hand of God whether it is love or hate man does not know.

Such a case amounts to the same thing as the question whether a Catholic of the kind we need to postulate in this instance, namely a man with a scientific, philosophical and theological formation, could, without guilt, come to the subjectively honest conviction that he can no longer honestly and in conscience believe and affirm the Church's authority.

Doubtless since man first became conscious of himself and of his mysterious environment, he has sought by whatever means seemed promising to know whether or not his world was friendly to him, and on what conditions.

It is as though, quite apart from the man, there exists a figure called Alasdair MacIntyre whose position you know whether or not you have read him — and whose name has become a specter that haunts all attempts to provide constructive moral and political responses to the challenge of modernity.

Men and women are all created in the image of God — whether they know it or not.

The man in the street, whether he knows it or not, still lives in Newton's world.

I do not know whether it is true that at each man's birth two angels are born, his good and his bad angel.

He drew the sword in his house, he stuck it into the wall, in order to know whether his hand would carry through; then he slew the powerful (man).»

The human will is simply in no way independent of God's all - embracing providential causality.47 «As far as men are concerned, whether they are good or evil, the heart of the Christian will know that their plans, wills, efforts, and abilities are under God's hand; that it is within his choice to bend them whither he pleases and to constrain them whenever he pleases.»

The whole POINT of the evangel is to let people know that it is GOOD NEWS, and that» eventually» every man shall bow» willfully» believing in Jesus, whether they bel; ieve now or in hell, or later at the restitution of ALL > But, yes, some people (many) will not believe now, and will surely go straight to Hell (grave) and rest there in their agony of separation, and some will repent.

Whether the man is a serious seeker of truth and righteousness or merely a dilettante, we do not know or care.

Whether the laity in prevailingly liberal churches can be shown to have more sensitive consciences than others and a greater sense of compulsion in serving their fellow men, I do not know.

Beyond lust for union and beyond romance, the meaning of man and woman has much to do with children, whether we know it or not.

I believe that she is the best person and only person (other than his wife - who has apologized for her actions) who knows whether or not his man is actually mentally ill.

The question is whether a generation which has lost its faith in all the gods of the nineteenth century, that is, in «history,» or «progress,» or «enlightenment,» or the «perfectibility of man,» is not expressing its desire to believe in something, to be committed somehow, even though it is not willing to be committed to a God who can be known only through repentance, and whose majesty judges all human pretensions.

I do not know whether some sort of decentralized democratic socialism can supply a healthier economic base for the kind of change that seems necessary if we are to continue as a society of free men and women.