Sentences with phrase «knows about fathers»

Everyone knows about fathers who fall behind on child support.

If you knew about my father you should know that he make Jewish stars as well as Muslim moons for victims of those faiths.

Whatever the source, the incident was so tasteless — particularly because King's 17 - year - old daughter had not known about her father's jail term — that it left many at the Speedway, fans and competitors alike, feeling foul and dirtied.

It is known that marital conflict and parental depression are causally related and connected with elevated adjustment problems in children, but relatively little is known about fathers» depressive symptomology, marital conflict, and child development (Cummings et al, 2010)

Many fathers pick up their children from nursery so this was identified early on as a place to target them and to let them know about Fathers Inc services and activities.

Rep. Ami Bera, D - Calif., has maintained he didn't know about his father's illegal campaign funding scheme..

I'm guessing from your Ted talk you might like to know about her father as well.

What do we know about fathers» involvement in home visiting and the impact on family outcomes?

Little is known about fathers» and mothers» complementary role in alleviating or buffering against the effect of spouses» reactions on children's emotion regulation abilities.

Not exact matches

Like her father — nationally known personal finance expert Dave Ramsey — Rachel Cruze helps educate people about how to handle money and stay out of debt.

I would love to move to a state with enough land and a warmer climate for my sons to ride their race bikes, my daughter to have the horse she dreams of and me to finally be at peace, I also believe that there should be someone home with the kids no matter what their ages are and as a single Mom with no family support or father involvement being at home for me is even more important, especially now that they are teenagers, There are no more nap times or time outs and the things you worry about during this age are so much more dangerous than falling down and hitting their heads as toddlers.

Donald Jr.'s meeting with Sajwani is a reminder of these inadequacies, especially because Sajwani posted the picture to Instagram, thus increasing the lunch's visibility and, along with it, the likelihood that the president will know about the ongoing interactions between his company and Sajwani's (that is, if Donald Jr. hasn't already made his father aware of them).

Children not among the targeted audience: those who worry about having enough food to last through the weekend, those who wonder why their father is no longer at home, and those who must learn to avoid neighborhood violence.

He also knew He was about His Father's business.

Towards then end, when we knew there would be no more treatment, I would listen to my mother and father talk about their life together and recall funny stories.

And then hear him pray through the excruciating pain for those who are killing him, «Father, forgive them, they don't know what they are doing,» and say to his disciple about his mother Mary, «behold thy mother,» (i.e., he was looking out for her and entrusting her into the car of his close friend, even as he suffered).

I mean who else would say «Father forgive them, for they know not what they do» about the people who were presently crucifying him?

It was when I became a father myself and knew what unconditional love is truly about that I became atheist.

His father was astonished and asked him, «What do you know about it?»

Since last week, I've been thinking about how differently my life and / or the world (all mankind) might have been, had I / we been taught what has been revealed to me over the last 20 + years and now know in my mind / heart is the truth / gospel for me, about Father God's love, character and nature, the death of Jesus and Salvation.

And «In my experience, it is only in Relationship that we can really know the character of Jesus, and whether or not that character seems to match up what some t - h - i - n - k they read about the Father in the Old Testament.»

For anyone that reads or has read the bible, then you would know that it say's «No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.»

I know that your post was about what I responded to earlier, but you are simply spreading lies about our founding fathers.

In my experience, it is only in Relationship that we can really know the character of Jesus, and whether or not that character seems to match up what some t - h - i - n - k they read about the Father in the Old Testament.

Speaking to his disciples about the «end times» in Mark 13: 32, Jesus says: «But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.»

Just want you to know that what Jesus did was not done in the fathers presence either, at the point he was about to die on the cross the father had turned away and Jesus knew he hung there alone at one point.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

Did you know there is a debate about whether we are supposed to be baptized «In the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit» (Matthew 28:19 - 20) OR «in the name of Jesus»?

You and your fellow preachers should read the old testament in the Holy Bible and recognize Who GOD THE FATHER is, you came against HIS anointed ONE not from man but from above you guys and gals are in BIG trouble, I'm sure you know what HE says about coming Against HIS ANOINTED.

Nephi, for example, who is said to have written the first two books of the Book of Mormon and to have been part of the migration from Jerusalem, already knew all about Jesus: «For according to the words of the prophets, the Messiah cometh in six hundred years from the time that my father left Jerusalem; and according to the words of the prophets, and also the word of the angel of God, his name shall be Jesus Christ, the Son of God» (2 Nephi 25:19).

When, in Acts 1, the disciples just before his ascension ask Jesus if he is about to restore the kingdom to Israel, they are told, «It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority» (Acts 1:7).

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

As to what the Scriptures have to say about homosexual orientation, my brother, you not only have to do deeper research, but most importantly approach Scripture in the Spirit of Love, as a child who knows nothing, seeking the guidance of his Father.

I don't know about «Hipster», but what Yeshua did was the will of the Father 24/7.

Rex Brendas somment was about jeremys article it was a joke as no man knows the time of Jesus return even Jesus himself only the father knows.She did nt think that was funny?

Still the fact remains that we do know quite enough about the historic life of Jesus to catch something of his filial obedience to God, his loving concern for men, his unceasing following of the will of his Father, and his equally unceasing desire to bring the Father's shepherding care home to his children.

because in the bible it states «But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father» Mark 13:32 and if jesus warned us about the end times so that verse alone is contradicting but there is always a logical explanation.

Both sons are prodicals what God is teaching us through the parable is revealing the intents of our hearts there sinful.The younger son wanted the worldly pleasures that was where his heart was at at least he is honest.The older brothers heart was no better because it was all about him it wasnt out of love for his father that he stayed on the farm but that by his works he would gain all that his father had.If he loved his father he would have known how his father would have responded to his brother and he himself would also have been happy to have seen his brother alive again.In the back of his mind he is worried that he may lose more of his inheritance and feels threatened and that is why he responds in the way he does.His heart hasnt changed at all even though his brother has come back from the dead.

Liddon was slightly uneasy about the verse in which Jesus said that only the Father knew the date of the End, but claimed that «the knowledge infused into the human soul of Jesus was ordinarily and practically equivalent to omniscience».17

At that time, a friend shall lose his friend's hammer, and the young shall not know where lieth the things possessed by their fathers that their fathers put there only just the night before, about eight o'clock.

«No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven nor the Son, but only the Father» (Mark 13:32), Interesting; I thought you people say that Jesus was GOD in the flesh.

Matthew 24:36 (New International Version) The Day and Hour Unknown 36 «But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, [a] but only the Father.

Even if they attempt to explain away «No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven nor the Son, but only the Father» (Mark 13:32), they can not explain away that most every Christian, theologian, scholar, and prophet from the first Century until the Nineteenth Century all believed that the church would go through the Great Tribulation and not escape through some secret rapture that would leave the world paralyzed.

1) Most importantly, Jesus Christ Himself said «No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father» (Matthew 24:36, Mark 13:32).

I don't know the father, and shouldn't speculate about why he acted as he did.

To me, it's all about knowing our Father, completely apart from religion.

No, it might be easy today to lie to the people about what this nations roots are, but when we seek the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, we find our fathers and see how much they believed in God.

I would add, following the example of the best American Catholic «public philosophers» John Courtney Murray and Orestes Brownson, that we should, as loyal Americans [we Porchers and REM fans are all about standing for the place where we live], actually explain why our Fathers built better than they knew — which means criticizing their thinking and affirming [most of] their practice with a theory that at least wasn't completely their own.

They know about the anti-Jewish polemics of certain church fathers; about the forced baptisms, especially of children; about the church council decree that sanctioned the removal of such children from their parents; about a papal edict encouraging raids on Jewish synagogues by the faithful; about the expulsion of all Jews from a country like Spain; about Luther's hate language directed against Jews when they did not convert according to his timetable; about the prohibition against Jews living in Calvin's Geneva; and about all the cruelties Christians have felt justified in perpetrating against the people they called «Christ - killers.»

I don't know what your viewpoint is on someone being gay and a Christian, but let me suggest that you read his book before you talk about the «choice» Wesley Hill made to be gay (he didn't), or how his father was abusive or absent (he wasn't), or how Wesley should just «man up» and fall in love with a woman (he's tried), or get «cured» by reading the Bible and praying more (he probably reads the Bible and prays more than you or I).