The best way to do that is with someone who
knows both climate science and psychotherapy, or a team who can cover both.
If
I know climate science some will hear it to support their own veiw.
I know the climate science community and they don't do things like this.
«I can't teach you climate science...» Seems to me you do nt
know climate science either, most of your advice is to just watch pro-global warming, pro-environmentalism videos.
Yet if this really was the conspiracy to keep out dissenting voices which Laframboise hints at, then how does she explain the presence of well
known climate science sceptics such as William Kininmonth, Ross McKitrick and Stephen McIntyre who were all given roles as «expert reviewers» in the last IPCC report?
The known climate science of global warming is not a mystery.
Being completely divorced from
the known climate science facts has (thank goodness) seriously undercut their credibility and trustworthiness.
Those of you who
know the climate science community will note that the list includes some of the very best — individuals whose contribution to scientific understanding and science communication would be lionized in a society that was seeing things clearly.
Some of the questions were badly worded and analysis was wrong because the authors didn't
know climate science.
But, I'm in the position of
knowing climate science V&V is not done quite the way it's done in nuclear or safety work.
Not exact matches
Mashable's Senior Editor for
Science and Special Projects, Kevin Freedman, in «No, New York Mag: Climate change won't make the Earth uninhabitable by 2100» contrasts the story's gloom against hope and optimism, but mostly analyses the science beh
Science and Special Projects, Kevin Freedman, in «
No, New York Mag:
Climate change won't make the Earth uninhabitable by 2100» contrasts the story's gloom against hope and optimism, but mostly analyses the
science beh
science behind it.
Do you actually
know what global
climate science says?
Trump's likely pick to fill the role of a top scientist at the USDA — Sam Clovis, best
known for hosting a conservative talk show in Iowa — is a
climate change skeptic with no background in
science.
Delaying infrastructure decisions is
no longer simply inconvenient, it's a matter of life and death for people in countries most affected by the adverse consequences of
climate change, Mr Clarke will claim in a debate to be held during the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Festival of Social
Science
Republicans on a congressional
science committee are asking state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to fork over a number of records related to his probe of
climate change and what Exxon Mobil may have
known about its effects on the environment.
Science could
no longer be detached from society, he said, arguing: «Think of the big questions of our time -
climate change, the spread of infectious diseases, water supply, biodiversity, terrorism.
I want to
know whether Stefanik and Faso believe in
science and in
climate change
science and the devastating impact
climate change will have on the environment of our children and grandchildren.
Since 1985, Project 2061 has led the way in
science education reform by first defining adult science literacy in its influential publication Science for All Americans and then specifying what K - 12 students need to know in Benchmarks for Science Literacy, which helps educators implement science literacy goals in the classroom; the AAAS Science Assessment website with more than 700 middle school test items; and WeatherSchool @ AAAS, an online resource where students can use real - world data to learn about the fundamental principles of weather and c
science education reform by first defining adult
science literacy in its influential publication Science for All Americans and then specifying what K - 12 students need to know in Benchmarks for Science Literacy, which helps educators implement science literacy goals in the classroom; the AAAS Science Assessment website with more than 700 middle school test items; and WeatherSchool @ AAAS, an online resource where students can use real - world data to learn about the fundamental principles of weather and c
science literacy in its influential publication
Science for All Americans and then specifying what K - 12 students need to know in Benchmarks for Science Literacy, which helps educators implement science literacy goals in the classroom; the AAAS Science Assessment website with more than 700 middle school test items; and WeatherSchool @ AAAS, an online resource where students can use real - world data to learn about the fundamental principles of weather and c
Science for All Americans and then specifying what K - 12 students need to
know in Benchmarks for
Science Literacy, which helps educators implement science literacy goals in the classroom; the AAAS Science Assessment website with more than 700 middle school test items; and WeatherSchool @ AAAS, an online resource where students can use real - world data to learn about the fundamental principles of weather and c
Science Literacy, which helps educators implement
science literacy goals in the classroom; the AAAS Science Assessment website with more than 700 middle school test items; and WeatherSchool @ AAAS, an online resource where students can use real - world data to learn about the fundamental principles of weather and c
science literacy goals in the classroom; the AAAS
Science Assessment website with more than 700 middle school test items; and WeatherSchool @ AAAS, an online resource where students can use real - world data to learn about the fundamental principles of weather and c
Science Assessment website with more than 700 middle school test items; and WeatherSchool @ AAAS, an online resource where students can use real - world data to learn about the fundamental principles of weather and
climate.
Those who
know more about
climate science, for example, are slightly more likely to accept that global warming is real and caused by humans than those who
know less on the subject.
«Rather than trying to assess the probability of an extreme event occurring, a group of researchers suggest viewing the event as a given and assessing to which degree changes in the thermodynamic state (which we
know has been influenced by
climate change) altered the severity of the impact of the event,» notes Dorit Hammerling, section leader for statistics and data
science at the Institute for Mathematics Applied to Geosciences, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Climate Change — Want to know more about climate change — the science, impacts and political
Climate Change — Want to
know more about
climate change — the science, impacts and political
climate change — the
science, impacts and political debate?
«We've
known just about everything we need to
know to do something about this issue for a very long time,» said Katharine Hayhoe, director of the Texas Tech University
Climate Science Center.
At the heart of the initiative is the «What We
Know» report, an assessment of current
climate science and impacts that emphasizes the need to understand and recognize possible high - risk scenarios.
The basic physics of
climate change have been
known for more than a century, but it is in recent decades that the fundamental
science of global warming has solidified
«Using more recent data and better analysis methods we have been able to re-examine the global weather balloon network,
known as radiosondes, and have found clear indications of warming in the upper troposphere,» said lead author ARC Centre of Excellence for
Climate System
Science Chief Investigator Prof Steve Sherwood.
That is because the assistant professor of earth and environmental
sciences at Vanderbilt University is a member of a small group of earth scientists who are pioneering in the use of mineral cave deposits, collectively
known as speleothems, as proxies for the prehistoric
climate.
IPCC, an international organization founded in 1988 by the United Nations, is best
known for its lengthy, periodic reports assessing
climate science and policy options for curbing global warming.
«If the IPCC comes out with significantly less than 100 cm of sea level rise, there will be people in the
science community saying we don't think that's a fair reflection of what we
know,» said Bob Corell, chairman of the Arctic
Climate Impact Assessment, speaking to Associated Press.
I don't
know how Ceri Thomas, head of programmes at BBC News, has the brass neck to argue that their coverage of the
science around
climate change is impartial and balanced (19 April, p 33).
«Agents doing the dirty bidding of the fossil fuel industry
know they can't contest the fundamental
science of human - caused
climate change,» he said in an email.
In 2004,
Science published a
climate change study — now widely
known as the «wedges» paper — that drew attention to the question of how to tackle the challenge of mitigating carbon pollution in the 21st century.
Science also tells us things that are hard to hear and that we don't
know how to fix:
Climate change is melting glaciers, raising sea levels and, new research shows, even affecting the ecosystems in our beloved lakes.
You
know, I wrote my dissertation on
science in the
climate debate.
«If we think about
climate science, they want to
know the size and shape of particles floating in the atmosphere,» Berg said.
Climate Change — Want to
know more about global warming — the
science, impacts and political debate?
They say that these debates about
climate change and teaching evolution in schools, you
know, really comes down, it really blurs the lines; it confuses the public about the kind of the boundaries between
science and ideology.
A 1990 law,
known as the Global Change Research Act, requires federal agencies to provide an overview of the latest
climate science and a thorough review of the impact of
climate change throughout the U.S. to the president and the Congress every four years.
A:
No,
science is more complex and messy than to understand how the
climate works.
And there was this great, it was my favorite moment of the weekend and it was this very dramatic moment, when basically Emanuel was complaining a little bit, very politely, and smiling about the fact that journalists still are doing stories about, you
know, the debate around
climate science, but there's not really, of course, there's not a debate, there's consensus that anthropogenic global warming is happening and that, why are you still doing these stories, asking questions?
One of
climate science's great quests is to project how much earth warms when carbon dioxide concentrations double — something
known as
climate sensitivity.
The
Science paper further suggested the distribution of hills at one mid-ocean ridge could be matched with three well -
known climate cycles — the Milankovitch cycles — that take place every 23,000, 41,000, and 100,000 years.
The technique, described in the current issue of
Science, could someday be used to equip a variety of crops with the genetic
know - how to survive in scorching
climates.
«For many of us, we
know our little bit of [
climate]
science,» he said.
Doubting or rejecting the
science on
climate change
no longer makes someone a «skeptic» or «denier» in the views of a leading news organization.
(Reuters)- The U.S. electric industry
knew as far back as 1968 that burning fossil fuels might cause global warming, but cast doubt on the
science of
climate change and ramped up coal use for decades afterward, an environmental watchdog group said on Tuesday.
«Anybody that's in
climate science knows that there are a lot of different forcing agents involved in
climate,» said Wigley.
«The overall significance is that although we already
know that reducing methane emissions can bring great societal benefits via decreased near - term warming and improved air quality, and that many of the sources can be controlled at low or even negative cost, we still need better data on emissions from particular sources,» Duke University
climate sciences professor Drew Shindell said.
Researchers hoping to wrangle all these data will meet next month in Boulder, Colorado, to assess the state of
science in the field
known as
climate informatics.
There is cloud hanging over
climate science, but one Cornell University expert on communication and environmental issues says he
knows how to help clear the air.
Roe and his U.W. co-author, atmospheric physicist Marcia Baker, argue in
Science that, because of this inherent
climate effect, certainty is a near impossibility,
no matter what kind of improvements are made in understanding physical processes or the timescale of observations.