Sentences with phrase «knows this character by»

By the time employees got to the ILT, they knew each character by role and name.

Not exact matches

If you're a fan of the «head slap» made famous by NCIS character Leroy Jethro Gibbs, you know that this non-injurious action is usually meant as a reminder when a team member is in violation of one of the Gibbs rules.

Meanwhile, Vox recently floated the idea of Fox going all - in on Deadpool by launching a film series, similar to Disney's The Avengers series, that would see his character team up with others from the X-Men comics to form a group known in comic books as the Uncanny X-Force.

Yeganeh was the inspiration for Yev Kassem, a character first portrayed by Larry Thomas in a 1995 Seinfeld episode who was known for making customers follow strict rules to order or risk being turned away with his forceful cry: «No soup for you!»

In reality, Mia Ash was a fictional character carefully built over a two - year period by an Iran - based hacker ring, known as «Cobalt Gypsy,» says Allison Wikoff, senior researcher and intelligence analyst for Dell SecureWorks Counter Threat Unit.

Her attorney, Cris Arguedas, says Heinen does not know if she's one of the duo implicated by Apple, but defends her character.

by Carl Richards In this book, Richards centers the senseless mistakes people make again and again financially, buying expensive because of others, buying things that aren't important — and explains how our natural characters lead us off the track even knowing what is correct.

For all I know, you are a mythical character created by a computer nerd in some lab in Chicago.

It will no longer do for New Testament scholars to place the Roman emperor amongst the ranks of divine men, gnostic redeemers, divinized heroes and other assorted and «Hellenistic» characters and then dismiss his significance by reason of the disreputable company that he keeps.

Sam, you wrote, «Do we know his character best by what we read or by knowing him?»

Do we know his character best by what we read or by knowing him?

The words fly by me like scenery zooming past on the interstate: «We also boast in our sufferings, knowing - that - suffering - produces - endurance - and - endurance - produces - character - and - character - produces - hope, and hope does not disappoint us, because God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit that has been given to us» (my hyphens).

@Chad «no serious scholar buys into that nonsense: The Christ myth theory (also known as Jesus mythicism, the Jesus myth theory and the nonexistence hypothesis) is the idea that Jesus of Nazareth was not a historical person, but is a fictional or mythological character created by the early Christian community.

I'm starting every day by writing down five things I am thankful for and five things I know to be true about God's character.

Because he knows that if he can discredit God by throwing mud at his character, and make men take in his lies, he has separated them from only hope they have.

Anyway, we have come to the conclusion that YES, God is God and he can do whatever HE wants, but He can never act outside of HIs character, and when we understand God's character is good and loving and compassionate and so on, then we are not threatened by Him doing what he wills, because we know His will is always good.

We know a great deal today about how our thinking is conditioned by culture, gender, and class interest, and is thoroughly perspectival in character, and we become rightly suspicious of every claim to truth that does not acknowledge its own conditionedness and relativity.

And it should at once be noted also that as long as such a Church law is in existence, the character of its obligation, the possibility of being excused or dispensed from it, the possibility of discussing its expediency or the need to change it, the possibility of knowing oneself not bound by it in a particular concrete case etc., are of quite a different kind from any case in which an immutable divine commandment is involved.

Within the setting of his life, such knowledge was quite unimportant, whereas what we mean by knowledge available but unknown to us actually contributes to determine the conditions of our own lives, and because we know it is not familiar to us, gives them a threatening and sinister character.

I have seen a lot of bad behavior from christians, (or those claiming to be) I was also incredibly surprised to find so many nonchristians, whether they be from varying religions, or agnostics and atheists, to have good behavior, and even exhibit «fruit of the spirit», what I once considered to be a way to test the faith, or rather character of a christian, (they will know them by their fruit).

I mean, I know many people of different faiths, and even agnostics and atheists who live by these «character traits.»

This limitation is by no means evident in terms of the ontological principle as we know it from Process and Reality, but it was very real in terms of the ontological principle Whitehead was then working with: «That every condition to which the process of becoming conforms in any particular instance has its reason in the character of some actual entity whose objectification is one of the components entering into the particular instance in question» (EWM 323f).

By «God», of course you mean the deity character in the collection of mythologies known as the bible and by «His Word», you clearly mean the words written by men (but of course they were magically dictated by the deity character because, despite its omnipotence, it was incapable of simply «poofing» «His Word» into existence in the same manner alleged for the rest of the universeBy «God», of course you mean the deity character in the collection of mythologies known as the bible and by «His Word», you clearly mean the words written by men (but of course they were magically dictated by the deity character because, despite its omnipotence, it was incapable of simply «poofing» «His Word» into existence in the same manner alleged for the rest of the universeby «His Word», you clearly mean the words written by men (but of course they were magically dictated by the deity character because, despite its omnipotence, it was incapable of simply «poofing» «His Word» into existence in the same manner alleged for the rest of the universeby men (but of course they were magically dictated by the deity character because, despite its omnipotence, it was incapable of simply «poofing» «His Word» into existence in the same manner alleged for the rest of the universeby the deity character because, despite its omnipotence, it was incapable of simply «poofing» «His Word» into existence in the same manner alleged for the rest of the universe).

What's even more incredible is that PRISM extolls a piece of music written by a man whose very character PRISM would call into question because of his s3xual orientation - except PRISM is so ignorant he failed to educated himself sufficiently to know that Barber was openly gay.

The «Father» of the Nation, being the United States of America is quoted saying; «The General is sorry to be informed — , that the foolish and wicked practice of profane cursing and swearing, a vice heretofore little known in an American army, is growing into a fashion; — he hopes the officers will, by example as well as influence, endeavor to check it, and that both they and the men will reflect that we can have little hope of the blessing of Heaven on our arms, if we insult it by impiety and folly; added to this, it is a vice so mean and low, without any temptation, that every man of sense and character detests and despises it.»

And all the transcendental properties of each and every existent can only be known as necessarily belonging to every being, in an analogous and hierarchical manner, because they are implicitly affirmed in every act of cognition as necessarily belonging to every possible object of knowledge by reason of the very character of a knowing subject.

The principal points Paul made in that address are (1) to recall to their minds the character and quality of his ministry to them; (2) to remind them of the trouble the Jews gave him and the anxiety and suffering he underwent in their behalf; (3) to state that he preached repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as the essence of the gospel; (4) to testify that he went now to Jerusalem not knowing what would happen to him there except that he knew by the Holy Spirit that afflictions awaited him; (5) to assure them that nothing concerned him, not even the loss of life itself, so long as he could testify to the grace of God in Jesus Christ; (6) to say that he had no regrets about his ministry to the people in Ephesus, for he was clean of the blood of all the people there, for he preached the full gospel to all of them; and (7) to admonish them to be diligent in their oversight of the Ephesian church and to feed the church of God there, which Christ purchased with his own blood.

The Galilean prophet and holy man, well known among his nearer countrymen, decides to seek out the capital of the country, the city whose character is determined by the priestly nobility, by Pharisaism, and by the Roman garrison.

but yeah there are a few churches that are maybe true but you have to decern what is the truth and what is not by testing the church you belong to God does give you the gift of Dicernment to find out what is right and what is wrong, «but do nt Judge a persons character just because he says this church or this church is doing something wrong cause for all we know he maybe right.

But they risk everything — their national character and their capacity to succor the downtrodden — by permitting uncontrolled mass migration of peoples who know nothing of their culture, in such huge numbers and at such speed that they can not possibly be assimilated and integrated into this or any future generation.

The formal designation can be made easily enough: When we refer to «Jesus Christ,» we are referring to the historical reality about which we were thinking in the preceding chapter — the reality from which the Christian community took its beginning and by which the continuing character of that community has been determined, the reality in and through which the revelation of God, known within the church, took place.

Each, to be sure, has its own character; each has sources unknown to or unused by the others; and each is shaped in accent and use of materials by circumstances known to us to some degree.

By his trust in the Transcendent Source of being, by his loyalty to all to whom he trusts the Father to be loyal, by his faithfulness to God he makes himself known to us as one who has the character of a SoBy his trust in the Transcendent Source of being, by his loyalty to all to whom he trusts the Father to be loyal, by his faithfulness to God he makes himself known to us as one who has the character of a Soby his loyalty to all to whom he trusts the Father to be loyal, by his faithfulness to God he makes himself known to us as one who has the character of a Soby his faithfulness to God he makes himself known to us as one who has the character of a Son.

Scientists can no more prove that there is not a planet inhabited by Sesame Street characters than believers can prove that there is.

And all of Dostoevsky's better characters are vivid and rich, and we feel we know them by the ends of their tales.

Starting with that, one can build a new life no longer battered by alcoholic compulsions and related character liabilities.

The time had passed when spiritual forces and values were determining the character of the western world; a new era had begun in which the scholar, the artist, the seer and the saint were being replaced by the soldier, the engineer and the politician, resulting in a technical civilization which was no longer Christendom.

No doubt most acts of minding are governed by habitual, or law - like, patterns of response whose different characters distinguish world - making capabilities across a wide organic spectrum.

What we certainly do know is that a god and / or gods are mythological characters which were created by man.

4 - 9) actually represents a communication from David, one strongly suspects it to be an act of senility again contrived by Nathan and Bathsheba; for it is totally out of character with the king as we have known him.

To have your name known by another was to reveal your character to another.

Helena is a traveller - from Colchester to Rome to Jerusalem - who begins her travels not knowing where she is going or why, but who ends the novel by being led, we assume, by a greater author who works through and with the narrator and his characters.

Remember, all we know of God is as a character that appears in a book just as these other beings appear in media so, by your argument, all of these things could equally exist.

The emphasis, especially by Paul, on the completely free character of God's gift, could lead to believers deciding that personal morality was no longer important.

• the fortitude of not going with the crowd; 7 • the fortitude of knowing that caring for the world is a nobler task than that of mastering it; • the fortitude of knowing that a successful woman is not the same as a successful man; • the fortitude of realising that money is less important than character; that you are worth more than your salary is worth; • the fortitude of preparing yourself for a worthwhile commitment and sticking by it (self - worth is empty without self - commitment); • the fortitude of being proud to aim at being a woman of character, and to resist the pathetic envy we are all capable of towards a man or woman with more power but with a weak character.

God, who created this infinite universe, and all that's in it being reflection of His infinite attributes, with even the smallest things so detailed in their design, that it would be total absurdity to think they have gotten that way by evolving themselves... this Creator would have never created us, human beings, giving us such abilities that we posses, without giving us a way to understand Him, His nature and His character and to KNOW Him, as we are known of Him.

Dying characters walk away down long shadowy corridors with God - knows - what at the end; they are carried off to the netherworld by huge flocks of preternatural sparrows; they ride a «steepening spiral of darkness... down and down, to whatever dreams there are.»

The more I know God's character the more I love him and I believe I was made to love him and be loved by him; to know him and be known by him.

I haven't even seen the movie yet, but just by surfing through Pinterest I know who the characters are.

I love getting swept away by a good plot and getting to know the characters, and I'm always sad when there isn't a happy ending or one of my favourite characters dies.