Sentences with phrase «label things in»

If it» she latter, can you guys please properly label these things in the future, this isn't the first time PSP games have been labeled as PS Vita games.

I know that some people need to label things in order to bond together, to find their niche or support.

Encourage your child to label the things in his picture with a word or just the first letter of a word.

He is a clever and thoughtful boy who carefully labels all things in their house that Mattie is losing the names for:» «SHAWL,» «WIRELESS,» «GAS MASK,» «CUTLERY DRAWER.»»

Not exact matches

Cat hates calling them «inmates» or «prisoners» or «convicts» or any other label that emphasizes the worst things they've done in their lives and wants them to see possibility in their futures.

And that trust could in principle be supported in two things, two forces that could make it more likely that those product labels would tell you the truth.

But that doesn't mean jobs will come back because [things are] made in America, because the labels may as well say made «by robots» in America.

Though critics over the years have labeled him any number of things — anarchist, socialist, even Marxist — make no mistake, Mackey is a true believer in (mostly unfettered) free enterprise, and his love for it is like that of a convert who finds salvation later in life.

«The amazing thing about that is that the glasses they featured in that episode are by Joseph Marc, one of our private label brands,» Magness says.

Millennials are often labeled as being financially irresponsible, spending too much on frivolous things or experiences, but they are actually positioning themselves to be in better financial...

In recent years, some things have been labeled the «Next Lehman,» like China's potential economic slowdown, a bankruptcy of Greece or high U.S. government debt levels.

I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is more than enough proof historically and in present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.

In more recent years, I've repeatedly seen the encouragement and value women have found in discovering the same things: the relief that following Christ doesn't mean forcing themselves into a box labelled «womanhood», which narrowly defines the life they should lead and sometimes restricts their gifts and callinIn more recent years, I've repeatedly seen the encouragement and value women have found in discovering the same things: the relief that following Christ doesn't mean forcing themselves into a box labelled «womanhood», which narrowly defines the life they should lead and sometimes restricts their gifts and callinin discovering the same things: the relief that following Christ doesn't mean forcing themselves into a box labelled «womanhood», which narrowly defines the life they should lead and sometimes restricts their gifts and calling.

I think our problem in society is that we label ourselves as things like «Christians» and «liberals».

I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...

I could like things that Joe wrote, and I could represent Joe if Joe just died and write and label my writing to be in the spirit of Joe.

Positron, all of your posts have dealt with what was done in the past, yet when I do the same thing, you label me a «devout pessimist»?

Many people will say there are no bad experiences, that it's our perspective on the things that happen in our lives that cause us to label them good or bad.

When I claim that label, I'm connecting not only with a number of active feminists who are working today to help women, but with an ongoing history of feminists who got women the vote, who made birth control happen, who got women into positions of power in the government, who worked to rectify racial inequality and fight against things like mandatory sterilization of welfare recipients.

It is why many in the g ay community have done a disservice to themselves, in my opinion, by labeling christians as ho m phobes and big ots when many of us are the furthest thing from that.

Second, I feel that he was in a sense labeling / judging his students by suggesting that they would do such a thing.

If a lion kills a zebra we don't call it «murder,» and if a great white forcibly copulates with a female, we don't call it «rap.e» If everything is objective to people, moral code being up for grabs, it seems quite feasible to live in a world where these things labeled as crimes are all just as ok as in the animal world!

But one thing is for sure, labeling others in such ways affects how we view and interact with them.

If you can do both those things, maybe you won't be labeled ignorant bigots, just silly ignorant people who believe in fairy tales before hard scientific facts.

In her view, the labels we use do not express, but rather distort, the most important things we can know and say about our own sexuality and human sexuality in generaIn her view, the labels we use do not express, but rather distort, the most important things we can know and say about our own sexuality and human sexuality in generain general.

Only I - Thou sees this wholeness as the whole person in unreasoned relation with what is over against him rather than as a sum of parts, some of which are labeled objective and hence oriented around the thing known and some subjective and hence oriented around the knower.

In my view, the labels we use do not express, but rather distort, the most important things we can know and say about our own sexuality and human sexuality in generaIn my view, the labels we use do not express, but rather distort, the most important things we can know and say about our own sexuality and human sexuality in generain general.

Although the whole Bible is revelational and thus inerrant in fulfilling its intention (something Fuller repeatedly affirms in spite of criticism by some like Lindsell), 45 those things in Scripture which are incidentally related to the completion of this revelational intention can be labeled «non-revelatory» matters.

Regardless of labels, I believe that the creating and redeeming God has greater things yet in store for the fulfillment of his purposes upon this planet.

Mr. Nuechterlein's rhetoric, labeling orthodox critics of Benke as «ultraconservatives» with a «sectarian mentality» and a «blinkered preoccupation with unionism,» sounded much more like the kind of orthodoxy - bashing one has come to expect from the mainstream media than the thoughtful commentary typical of First Things in general and Mr. Nuechterlein's work in particular.

FYI «children and other living things» are neither atheists nor theists, those false labels are created and imposed by adult humans in their desire to be seen as something other than what they are.

When a person exhibits too much passion over anything — God, a political movement, the latest in tattoos or a popular television show — we label that person as obsessive or compulsive, and mutter, «Get a life» Might we better understand zeal as Isaiah does, as the prerogative of God, who, despite the mess we've made of things, still chooses to care for this battered creation and our faulty selves?

Yes Ducatihero... «christian»... although I don't use that label... others do for me... I also get atheist (i might get that more so after today's post)... we wouldn't be on the same page I'm sure... but that doesn't bother me... i still believe in the unity of all things... that at the deepest and most fundamental level we are connected, one, and that ideas only seem to divide or separate us.

As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.

To call a person or thing medieval is often to label it as obscurantist; recall the depiction of the «Age of Faith» in the movie The Name of the Rose, in which Sean Connery as Br.

If there is one thing you SHOULD (in my subjective opinion) have learned about me it is that my beliefs are NOT governed by any labels you or anyone else seek to place upon me.

The more things we label «must haves» the more we de-power people by making it increasingly difficult from them to build communities (churches) in their tribes.

Whether formulated by Durkheim (a system of beliefs and practices related to sacred things), by Weber (that which finally makes events meaningful), or by Tillich (whatever is of ultimate concern) religion in its «classical» sense refers not so much to labels on a church building as to the imagery (myth, theology, and so forth) by which people make sense of their lives — their «moral architecture,» if you will.6 That human beings differ in their sensitivity to and success in this matter of «establishing meaning» there can be no doubt.

Humans rising up to comfort one another in the wake of a tragedy is a beautiful thing and I view it as slightly insulting to have someone label it with a ridiculous label like «god».

People are too caught up on labels nowadays and it truly stops them from seeing the good in a lot of people and the good things they have to offer.

I think this case she said something without thinking based on pre-existing bias about the label «atheist» and demonstrated honesty (at least in terms of how she views the term) more than many of the things she says to be inclusive.

But it you aren't in that position, letting go of a label may be just the thing that makes you too vulnerable to withstand the storm.

I to can only eat things that is organic so I redo alot of the recipes so I can eat alot of stuff I «am allgic to pesticides, hornmores, n antibotics, dairy, eggs, whey, so I watch n read everything, I do not have a galdbladder n was told I could eat everything after that well I could not n get sick after that it will come out of 1 of the ends is all i need to say, but if I eat this stuff I «am ok, for everybody that may have the same problem as me just try drinking the organic milks w / o hornmores, pesticdes, n antibotics in it n see if that works for you same with the eggs thats what I do open the lid n see what it says, if it don't say that well its not for you (eggland) is one of the names I use horizan, silk, r 2 of the milk blands I use, they also have sorbet icecream but watch them some do have milk in them n if it doesn't say organic milk your not getting that your getting real milk, then go on internet n read, read, read all your labels n read whats best for you cause everybody is not the same, I hope that helps n feel free to send me a message n let me know if anybody wants: - P

In a world of natural products I try to gravitate away from anything with natural flavors as that can mean a variety of things and I like ingredient labels to be as transparent as possible.

PLEASE don't label things nut free that absolutely are NOT, it can cause some well - meaning person somewhere to put someone else in great danger.

Buddha Bowls, Power Bowls, Superfood Bowls, Bliss Bowls: while these labels sound uber - trendy, they're all names for basically the same thing, a balanced meal that provides a significant health boost, served in a bowl.

Yes, I think yellow split peas are the same thing... sometimes they are labeled as that here in the US, too.

«Good things are going on in private label development,» he says, adding that Orion is open to acquisitions.

Next thing you know, we'll find apples labeled «gluten - free» in the produce aisle.

Yes you heard that right, the very thing that is labeled as natural is created in a lab and has been proven to cause disease in the body.