Sentences with phrase «labeling people with»

I'm glad to see that others here are labeling people with comments such as this as «trolls».

Not exact matches

Not content to just offer drivers Spotify access, Tesla is reportedly in talks with major record labels to create a new way for people to listen to music.

They thought the tourist aspect would make the store worth it, but they found, on a day - to - day basis, people wanted to buy the more inexpensive candy bar with a local label to give as vacation gifts.

«The initial purpose of record labels was connecting musicians with people who wanted to listen to their music,» says Damian Kulash, OK Go's lead singer.

From label execs to music bloggers to managers and beyond, there's a long list of people who an artist must build relationships with in order to reach larger audiences and expand their brand.

If you know one of those people, tide them over with labeled tees and matchsticks.

The Uberconference app has large, brightly - colored buttons with labels like «evict» (remove a person from a call) and «earmuff» (mute the sound for one or more participants).

Combine this insatiable demand for talent with a sub-cultural shift of regarding labels such as «nerd» and «dweeb» as positive indicators of nuanced passion rather than pariah - like brands, and you end up with many more people interested in coding.

Food with labels like organic and natural has simply become another luxury good in which people are coughing up more than a product's true value, Friedberg says.

People are still in love with the label «gluten - free» — at least, the giant fortune - cookie maker Lady Fortunes believes so.

Where other companies supply their stores with headquarters - authored mission and values statements, Life Is Good provides loose - leaf binders labeled «Fuel» and stuffed with thank - yous from people who have taken solace or inspiration from its message.

With the Google service, people can more quickly find products like shirts that feature specific Disney characters through Disney's online store, even if the images haven't been properly labeled with the characters» naWith the Google service, people can more quickly find products like shirts that feature specific Disney characters through Disney's online store, even if the images haven't been properly labeled with the characters» nawith the characters» names.

I think that, plus the amount people care, and the amount of empathy they have for customers, and how open we are with information — I think all of that combined is what we might label as a «startup culture.»

Whitney Port worked with Conrad at Teen Vogue and People's Revolution before launching the Whitney Eve fashion label in 2009.

USA - 2009: Gabi Campanario illustration of a person climbing a ladder toward a giant basket filled with eggs labeled 401K.

Research from Label Insights showed that transparency was the number one factor motivating brand loyalty, with 94 percent of people saying they'd be loyal to brands that show complete transparency.

Those people don't usually come with labels.

Sticking with our recent articles on Amazon private label selling and market traction, I thought I would talk with an actual million dollar private label brand, who is finding success, through methods like developing original products, and share that with you.I talked with Raj Jana, the Founder of JavaPresse Coffee Company, who is building a brand that creates meaningful products and experiences that help people make the most of the moments they love, which starts with the ritual of making and drinking one perfect cup of coffee every single day.

Take away: Come up with labels, headlines and hashtags that stick in people's brains.

Agency loans are SunTrust's label for the Fannie Mae HomeReady ® and Home Possible ® programs, which both allow higher loan - to - value ratios that allow people with less in savings to think about applying for a home loan.

The answer is simple, they aren't — it is the white, more Aryan featured Jews in this country who have labeled themselves as «Neocons» who have merged with the 15 % Ethnic German Majority in this country to lead the Genocide against the Iraqi people in the name of land (Palestine), Oil, and ostensibly protecting the Holy land of Israel (this last one is where the Neocon Jews really did some great salesmanship in selling this argument to the dumb Christian Americans who said, Yep!

Oh and if you want to have interesting debates in the future with people and not get labelled as a troll then learn how to form logical arguments.

That is, go and find an actual and factual group of people with that label.

I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...

He certainly spent time with the wrong people, and he drank enough for them to label him a drunkard (Matt.

Naming / defining is an exercise of power over others, so perhaps naming other persons made in the Divine image, with the potential to become godlike, by labeling them «believers» or «unbelievers» is a failure to see all people as God sees them, children of the one true God.

All atheists are, whatever they label themselves, are people who have some sort of anger issue with God, that they blame God for.

I wouldn't think mankind could bring itself to label that many people with a mental disorder either.

You want people to argue your main ideas, not whether you've used a label in a way that's consistent with their understanding of a complex theory.

It long ago became a place for people who wanted to keep the label of «Christian» without adhering to any of the concomitant beliefs that comes with it.

It's when the name calling and condemning to hell starts that people get irritated with the «orthodox» and one might receive the label, heresy hunter.

I think it is another one of those texts we rip out of context so that we can label and condemn certain people with mental problems.

It took me a long time to reconcile what I was — a strong - willed woman who wasn't going to take crap from people who judge me because of my sex — with the label of «feminist.»

Far left people do this a lot... They make generalizations, don't give specifics and label with little to no evidence.

Personally, I believe that discoveries in Quantum Physics point to a reality that is traditionally labeled «God», but most scientists and religious people don't seem to agree with this idea.

What I don't get is, being critical of Zionistic policies, agenda or people is quickly labeled as «anti-semitic» and is even considered illegal in countries like Germany, yet a bigoted person like Geert Wilders (who has not once consulted any expect or scholar on Islam) can make a video which literally embodies everything that hate, racism, and ignorance is about, and yet get away with it where the court recognizes it as «denigrating» but not «illegal»!?

With enough focus on labels, they being to exclude and separate people.

Many people that lack belief in god are ashamed to associate with this label.

If you persist in labeling yourself as a special separate group of people, how can you expect other people not in your group to understand that you are equal when you refuse to do it??? And after all the effort we've all put into it????? But I stand outside your group and ask that you simply become everyone along with everyone, free and equal and not separate — not ever again — ever...!

I'm talking about which group of people she identifies with and therefore accepts the «label» of.

This should encourage us to engage people with relationship and describing the story of our community, rather than merely relying on labels and sound bytes.

When I hear people or places describing / selling themselves a certain way, I tend to hold back and take a wait and see approach... is there an effort to live up to that label... or is it just a catchy phrase reflecting the mood of the marketplace with no real commitment behind it.

Labels are useful because if people are familiar with them, communication is much quicker.

If a lion kills a zebra we don't call it «murder,» and if a great white forcibly copulates with a female, we don't call it «rap.e» If everything is objective to people, moral code being up for grabs, it seems quite feasible to live in a world where these things labeled as crimes are all just as ok as in the animal world!

To the folks who are vehemently denying this person was a Christian, I would urge you to consider this: If a person with a muslim name commits an act of terrorism, he is immediately labelled an «Islamic» terrorist, no questions asked, even though the Quran clearly states that a person who kills an innocent is like he / she has murdered then whole of humanity (the Quran mentions this in reference to murder of ANY innocent person, irrespective of the victims belief): To quote from the Quran: «On that account We ordained for the Children of Isra`il that if any one slew a person — unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land — it would be as if he slew the whole humanity: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole humanity.

I've taken to just describing peoples actions that I disagree with, rather than labeling the person.

In my role as a «public Christian» who leads a church and who values spirited discourse about the issues of our time, I want to nurture environments where people can openly wrestle with their beliefs — but without the fear of being caricatured, labeled or demonized.

Its not bigotry becasue people disagree with your lifestyle — get over yourself and quit labeling things incorrectly to try and bolster your position and push your beliefs on others.

Only I - Thou sees this wholeness as the whole person in unreasoned relation with what is over against him rather than as a sum of parts, some of which are labeled objective and hence oriented around the thing known and some subjective and hence oriented around the knower.

What I meant was that people who label everything good and bad, tend to avoid «bad» things like anger and sadness and fear so that instead of dealing with those emotions, they just pretend they aren't there — even though they still are.