Many seasoned climate scientists and energy experts, some of whom walked the halls here during the meeting like an admonitory Greek chorus, still expressed optimism that nations generating the century - long spike in emissions from burning fuels and forests were poised to divert from paths long
labeled on graphs as «business as usual.»
My apologies about the lack of clear
labels on the graph; I threw it together a tad quickly.
Another reviewer, Danny Harvey from the University of Toronto, pointed out that the descriptive text written by the IPCC's authors was at odds with
the labeling on a graph.
Not exact matches
HSA.CED.A.2 Create equations in two or more variables to represent relationships between quantities;
graph equations
on coordinate axes with
labels and scales.
Have each child place his / her post-it
on the
graph next to the appropriate
label.
Firstly, looking at how we decide
on labelling circular
graphs and then specific example questions.
This is a really neat resource for demonstrating the need for
labelling of axes
on graphs.
Create equations in two or more variables to represent relationships between quantities;
graph equations
on coordinate axes with
labels and scales.
Graph the equations
on coordinate axes using appropriate
labels, units, and scales.
@csmithmaui could you give the
label for the various colors
on the
graph?
My impression, although it's hard to prove, is that this has shifted the world slightly away from that uncomfortable line
on graphs labeled «business as usual.»
Trends of «adjusted observations» that are not clearly
labelled as such, and do not include the raw observations
on the same
graph are very misleading in my opinion.
As seen in the
graph above from Gillett 2008, IPCC model simulations based solely
on known natural factors (the blue line
labeled NAT), erroneously reported no change in 20th century Arctic temperatures.
Ah... As near as I can tell (because you have presented a
graph with no context and even no
labels on the axes), what you are showing is a
graph over the last 100,000 years.
Lamb defined them by the dotted line
on the
graph, as the
labeling indicates.
But your referenced
graph lacks
labels for the horizontal axis, and what are the ks
on the curves?
I can see why one might be wary of splicing them together, or carelessly
labelling them, but as separate lines
on the same
graph?
And
label all the axis
on the
graphs with a description of what they're a measurement of...
You admitted you spliced the proxy with the instrument record without
labeling that fact
on the
graph...... Bit silly wasn't it?
(In the
graph on the right, the
labels that begin with «AEO» are measuring expectations from the original Annual Energy Outlook, so they do not include the Clean Power Plan.
It's clear that Snap wants to downplay the low user growth, considering it slapped a big «3 billion + daily snaps created»
label ON TOP of its DAU
graph.
You can dig deeper and get a more granular overview by clicking
on the small link under the the
graph labeled «Usage details».