Using local estimates of
labor force participation by gender and parental status from the U.S. Census Bureau, and weighting the estimates by the population of parents in each census tract, this analysis compares parental labor force participation between child care deserts and nondeserts.
If enacted, JCT estimates that Camp's discussion draft would increase
labor force participation by an average of between 0.3 and 1.5 percent each year this decade, and increase private sector employment by between 0.4 and 1.5 percent.
Not exact matches
If growing unemployment was not enough, a decline in
labor market
participation was also on the rise, the ILO said, a warning borne out
by the latest U.S. jobs data from December which showed that the
labor force participation rate tumbled to 62.8 percent, its worst level since January 1978.
In a separate report released yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the
labor force participation rate would decline from 62.9 % in the fourth quarter of 2013 to 60.8 %
by 2024.
True, our unemployment rate is biased down due to the weak performance of
labor force participation and still - elevated underemployment, but as I've extensively documented, the US job market has been tightening up for awhile, driven
by solid employment growth, now averaging around 200,000 / month.
Though these monthly data are notoriously jumpy, the out - sized job gains were accompanied
by a nice pop in
labor force participation rate — up 0.3 percent to... Read more
The unemployment rate fell to 4.3 percent, its lowest level since 2001, but for the wrong reason:
labor force participation fell
by two - tenths of a percent.
During the 2014 - 24 period, the growth of the
labor force will be due entirely to population growth, as the overall
labor force participation rate is expected to decrease even further
by 2024.»
Unemployment, Marginal Attachment and
Labor Force Participation in Canada and the United States Stephen Jones, McMaster University Craig Riddell, University of British Columbia Jones and Riddell build on two previous papers: one by David Card and Riddell (originally published in Small Differences that Matter) that studies the reasons for higher rates of unemployment in Canada than the U.S. in the 1980s, the other by Jones and Riddell which uses data from the U.S. Labor Force Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the labor f
Labor Force Participation in Canada and the United States Stephen Jones, McMaster University Craig Riddell, University of British Columbia Jones and Riddell build on two previous papers: one by David Card and Riddell (originally published in Small Differences that Matter) that studies the reasons for higher rates of unemployment in Canada than the U.S. in the 1980s, the other by Jones and Riddell which uses data from the U.S. Labor Force Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the labor f
Force Participation in Canada and the United States Stephen Jones, McMaster University Craig Riddell, University of British Columbia Jones and Riddell build on two previous papers: one
by David Card and Riddell (originally published in Small Differences that Matter) that studies the reasons for higher rates of unemployment in Canada than the U.S. in the 1980s, the other
by Jones and Riddell which uses data from the U.S.
Labor Force Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the labor f
Labor Force Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the labor f
Force Survey to study the differences in rates of job creation for people who are counted as unemployed versus those who are counted as out of the
labor f
labor forceforce.
The
Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) is a simple computation: You take the Civilian
Labor Force (people age 16 and over employed or seeking employment) and divide it
by the Civilian Noninstitutional Population (those 16 and over not in the military and or committed to an institution).
The
labor force participation rate has moved higher
by two - tenths in recent months to 62.9 % and has yet to move above 63.0 % since March 2014.
The unemployment rate continued to fall in April, reaching another post-financial crisis low of 4.4 %, although this was partly offset
by a marginal decline in the
labor force participation rate.
The decline in the employment - to - population ratio for 25 to 54 year olds has been offset to some degree
by rising employment rates for those 55 and older, helping to close the jobs gap.1 Since November 2007, the overall
labor force participation rate has fallen from 66.0 percent to 62.9 percent.
Flake argues that America needs more low - skill workers — even though America's low - skill workforce has the country's highest unemployment rate and
by far the lowest
labor -
force participation rate.
The most prominent is a brilliant analysis
by Betsey Stevenson that examines the impact of Title IX on girls»
participation in high school sports, finding a significant increase in college going and
labor force participation.
Labor -
force participation had a small uptick since the previous month, increasing
by 0.1 %, but over the year has increased
by 0.5 %.
According to «Millennial Jobs Report for March, 2013» released
by Generation Opportunity, the March unemployment rate for millennials is 11.7 %, but when the
labor force participation rate is factored in, the percentage becomes 16.2 %.
«Though the main long - term drivers of housing activity remain stalled — namely below average growth in median household income,
labor force participation, bank lending and household formation — metro markets continue to get a boost from pent - up demand caused
by the low inventory that plagued housing for the past two years,» Redfin researchers note.