And finally unemployment is low and
labour share of income is low.
Not exact matches
The productivity - median compensation divergence can be broken down into two aspects
of rising inequality: the rise in top - half
income inequality (divergence between mean and median compensation) which began around 1973, and the fall in the
labour share (divergence between productivity and mean compensation) which began around 2000.
In the US, a first generation
of fatherhood programmes, notably Parents» Fair
Share (PFS) recorded the difficulty and complexity
of improving
labour market outcomes for low
income men.
Labour MP David Lammy proposes a shift to taxation
of unearned wealth from taxation
of income and that we adopt power -
sharing and profit -
sharing in companies in his 2011 book Out
of the Ashes.
Though technological developments might put downward pressure on
labour's
share of national
income, workers would be compensated for this by their greater access to the return on capital.
Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty First Century argues that, absent corrective action, we can look forward to a rise in capital's
share of national
income and a corresponding depression
of the
share of labour.
The Low
Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) has welcomed a recommendation in a report by the House
of Commons Work and Pensions Committee that the «self - employed» should be given at least «worker» employment status unless the engager
of their
labour can prove otherwise.1 This is a recommendation that LITRG made in written evidence to a separate inquiry.2 LITRG believes that the denial
of employment rights to people working in the «gig economy» and the exploitation
of other flexible workers regarding their taxes
share a common cause: the workers» own lack
of knowledge, their reluctance to challenge their treatment because they lack confidence or just need the work and the businesses involved apparently having little fear
of action being taken against them by public bodies.
But
Labour MP Paul Flynn said: «It's what the Tories call the
shared society: a top Tory's
share is a # 15million bonanza and millions
of sick and disabled
share a loss
of # 30 weekly
income.»
Last week, I wrote that the Government is currently on track to haul back the State's
share of the economy from the ruinous 47.7 per cent
of national
income it reached under
Labour to 39.5 per cent within five years.
The
Labour government did reduce the national debt - as shown in the national accounts - as a
share of national
income at the end
of the last century (although it's questionable whether most people would understand this to be the «last few years»
of which Brown went on to speak).
He said
Labour had «never sought to devolve
income tax - varying powers and warned that such a move risks «undermining the union» by limiting the «ability to pool risk and
share rewards between the peoples and regions and nations
of Britain.»
First, corporate profits are booming because
of declining commodity prices and a weak jobs market that has driven down the cost
of labour (the
share of U.S. GDP going to
labour income is at its lowest level in 50 years).
Deficits in
labour force status,
income share, educational status, housing and health among Aboriginal people in the region are
of a scale that only a partnership approach to regional development involving both industry and government could hope to redress.114