Not exact matches
About six months ago, Marianne Lombardo from DFER showed the
lack of correlation between NAPCS's and CER's
charter -
law scores and CREDO.
Two dozen states
lack the kind of «
charter - friendly» policies they need to earn top points on their Race to the Top applications, according to a new review of
charter school
laws.
But contrary to what some have said in defense of DeVos, the
law's passage was not a sign of her
lack of influence or of her support for
charter accountability.
The model
law recognizes that in many states, including New York, a
lack of information about the funding gap between
charter schools and their host district is a significant hurdle to even considering the issue.
It is clear that the
laws which allow
charter schools so much «autonomy» (and
lack of scrutiny and immunity from Freedom of Information legislation) only protects the guilty and greedy.
State and Federal
laws and regulations that allow for that diversity can also lead to some
lack of clarity, especially as
charter schools are concurrently governed by corporate not for profit
laws and are public entities under Government and Education Codes.
However, across the 44 states with
charter school
laws, there is significant confusion and
lack of transparency regarding not only how, but also how much funding,
charter schools receive to support provision of special education programs.
This level of scrutiny has been sorely
lacking over the quarter century of
charter school growth and promotion, but Mr. Oliver was specific and devastating, looking at schools that suddenly shut down without warning, crooked financial arrangements, questionable
charter school applications, and oversight
laws allowing administrators to select their own non-profit organizations as the legal overseer of their owns
charters.
It's great that Mr Pink is stepping down as his decision and the NSBS» decision to pursue this matter shows their
lack of understanding of
Charter rights, the reach of a
law society and
lack of leadership.
In two decisions, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal dismissed the complaints for
lack of jurisdiction, and concluded such a challenge may only be brought under s. 15 of the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms and therefore must be made to a court of
law.
This shows a systemic bias against protests in common
law courts and the
lack of implementation of
Charter rights when corporations sue individuals and community groups.
Regarding the IRP system of convicting suspected impaired drivers in BC, are you concerned that the
lack of
charter protection inherent in administrative
law versus criminal court is impairing the justice available to those so charged?
Ottawa - based criminal lawyer Michael Spratt said the government's
Charter analysis
lacked depth and any reference to case
law, stating it failed to mount a serious defence of the proposed changes.