But due to
the lack of a strong trend, we should aim for nearer targets.
Not exact matches
This is a negative dimension
of the global marketization; and there seems to be
lacking any
strong trends to control or balance this
trend in the current global situation.
A recent scientific review article on climate and the sun similarly notes «the
lack of detection
of an underlying irradiance
trend in the past three decades,» and concludes, in rather
strong terms, that:
Sea surface temperatures in the Western Pacific are well above climatology, and it has been argued that the warmth in the Western Pacific along with the
lack of an equivalent long - term warming
trend in the Eastern Pacific, increase the chances
of a «super El Niño,» comparable to the two
strongest El Niños
of the past century, which occurred in 1998 and 1983.
Therefore, if your claim is true that the recent cessation
of a
trend is merely random fluctuation around the long term
trend, then the
lack of change after 1970 to the long term
trend is
strong evidence that AGW has had no discernible effect.
The
lack of trend in the cosmic ray intensity over the last 50 years (Agee et al., 2012; McCracken and Beer, 2007) provides another
strong arguement against the hypothesis
of a major contribution
of cosmic rays to ongoing climate change.
The
lack of trend in the cosmic ray intensity over the last 50 years (Agee et al., 2012; McCracken and Beer, 2007) provides another
strong argument against the hypothesis
of a major contribution
of cosmic rays to ongoing climate change.»