«An Urban Legend is usually a (good / captivating / titillating / engrossing / incredible / worrying) story that has had a wide audience, is circulated spontaneously, has been told in several forms, and which many have chosen to believe (whether actively or passively) despite
the lack of actual evidence to substantiate the story.»
Religious beliefs certainly can, and given the complete
lack of actual evidence for any supernatural aspect of religion, they ought to be questioned at every opportunity.
Not exact matches
For example, against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor
of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the
actual world is made up exhaustively
of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable
evidence, such as the fact that a
lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the most elementary level
of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex
of events (not
of enduring substances).
But you are correct that the
actual case / crime only entails the
actual struggle, and by that point it was just two dumb - dumbs in a fight, and the
lack of evidence is what really made acquittal the only choice for the jury.
Sharing a link / video / story from known conspiracy theorists — who frequently
lack any
actual evidence or facts — shouldn't be a default reaction in the wake
of tragedies.
The objective unity
of the world, even though the experience
of it may be difficult to reconstruct, is not
of a character more
lacking in
evidence than the concretion
of the world in
actual, perishing occasions.
The findings begin to fill - in the
lack of actual scientific
evidence of a correlation between service dogs and levels
of PTSD symptoms experienced by veterans.
- projecting your
lack of knowledge and biases onto others (and especially onto the
actual body
of evidence), and
Regardeless, we've already discussed that the scientiic consensus does matter for those who are unwilling / unable to understand the
actual science due to
lack of time or impossibility to gain the level
of expertise required to judge the
actual evidence.
We are supposed to believe their declaration
of a global climate catastrophe based on trivial changes in world temps, while ignoring the
evidence that their claims
lack actual data and that their cures are far worse than the potential problem.
The claim was dismissed by the Court
of Appeal due to the
lack of evidence of the
actual affordability
of the fees in the financial circumstances
of typical individuals.
Dismissal for
lack of evidence or prosecutorial discretion is not the same as having a right recognized on the record that would enable you to win a claim for false arrest or other damages, get state laws struck down, etc. that would be able to be done if you had an
actual right.