It has also been interesting to note
the lack of goals from a usually free - scoring Tottenham.
However, with the current
lack of goals from our attack, a change in formation is definitely justified; and might even become necessary.
There has been a surprising
lack of goals from them in front of their home crowd, returning just an average of 1.2 per game and having just 22 % of their home games going over 2.5 goals.
The lack of goals from Stewart Downing has also been a disappointment this season, not to mention Afonso Alves.
But the player himself wants a more central role; and unlike England where the likes of Rooney and Kane are regular goalscorers, at Arsenal
the lack of goals from our strikers lends weight to Walcott's demands.
The mystery to me is
the lack of goals from our usual goalscorers and today is the day to change that, let's hope.
The concerns I would have about the home side in this one is
the lack of goals from Robin van Persie of late, and if Wayne Rooney is fit to return, how sharp will he be?
Should we be concerned with
the lack of goals from the first two matches?
So far,
the lack of goals from the offensive line could be covered up by the second line, thanks to Alan Dzagoev, Bibras Natkho, Aleksandr Golovin and Georgi Shchennikov.
the reason why arsenal did not win the league isn't because of giroud.it was
lack of goals from left wing.
I also think that
the lack of goals from wingers had quite a bit to do with who are wingers are: do you really expect Brad Davis or Connor Hallisey to start scoring tons of goals if you put a different forward in front of them?
I know all us Arsenal fans are upset with
the lack of goals from Olivier Giroud, Theo Walcott and Alexis Sanchez at the moment, but everyone is now treating Danny Welback as the returning Messiah after he popped up with the winning goal against Leicester.
my concern is
the lack of goals from the striker positions, last year we were tied with west ham for 4th in goals scored behind city, LC and spuds.
The lack of goals from Iwobi and what seemed to be a somewhat rushed approach to finishing was the main complaint but as the boss pointed out he is still very young.
Wenger likes him, but he does realise that if he gets injured or looses form there is an immediate
lack of goals from the team, Ive seen people write about how Walcott or Akpom may come good, but till its happened its Wishful thinking.
The lack of goals from benzema could be due to the fact that ronaldo is too selfish.
The lack of goals from Giroud has already seen him lose the position to Walcott.
Not exact matches
Acuff argues that what prevents people
from completing
goals isn't a
lack of effort but the desire for perfection.
In the light
of the recent US election, one
of the more interesting findings
from the Global Opportunity Report 2016 was a
lack of trust
from North American businesses in the political system to take on the task
of pursuing sustainable
goals.
The top reasons why millennials leave their companies are because they received a better offer
from another company (30 %), their career
goals aren't aligned to their company (27 %) and a
lack of career opportunities (13 %).
It flowed naturally
from a
lack of foresight, clearly designated
goals, and political leadership.
Apart
from his
goal against crystal palace, I can not remember any half chance and
goal he created for himself.In fact in today's match, he was barely marked for his
lack of threat.
2 Giroud can not dribble, run or shoot
from outside the box 3 Ramsey can not pass beyond 6 yard 4 Walcott has only pace and accuracy 5 Welbeck
lacks composure in front
of goal
It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition
from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to
goal, very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his
lacking defensive qualities and defenders who
lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead
of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best
from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes
of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge
of making those decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer
It was clear
from the start
of this must win Premier eague game that Arsenal were a team suffering a little bit with a loss
of confidnce and a
lack of goals.
The impressive form
of the Saints so far has somewhat taken attention away
from this Republic
of Ireland international's failures and
lack of goals since a # 12m summer move.
He only remains defensive when he has to, in this case he didn't need to, we didn't concede
goals because
of him, we conceded
from Walcott trying to dribble out
of the box and
from our defenders
lacking concentration.
The Gunners will hand out a fair few thrashings and rack up a really healthy
goal difference, but their
lack of a plan B away
from home will cost them too many points.
Though Chelsea didn't score any
goals in the second half, it certainly wasn't for a
lack of effort
from Pedro, who was making chances left and right and looking like the man Chelsea had paid a hefty sum to Barcelona for.
To go after him or not may or may not be a wise idea, I don't know, all I know is that between Walcott and Giroud, there's 40
goals and with Welbeck's 10 plus the rest
from midfield, there's enough
goals in the squad, however Wenger needs to take his head out
of the sand and look at the right wing and or the CDM, for those positions are
lacking depth; sorry but Arteta I don't ththink is ample cover, we've loaned Hayden and Wilshire is injured so there's a void there.
Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard
of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions
from the get - go... indicative
of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part
of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style
of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership
from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey
from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless
of their glaring
lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's
goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a
goal until the final week last season)... this
of course is just one example
of many... before I hear another word
from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player
of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure
of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!
Welebeck needs to add to his tally
of goal that is the only thing
lacking from him.
«When liverpool had the sas tearing up the prem, a
lack of goals did not prevent them
from winning the league.»
Welbeck's
goal was far
from being accidental / flukey — it was on the cards knowing how MU defence knock it back and sideways ad nauseum, their general
lack of confidence and because
of the pressure DW was putting on them and Blind in midfield.
There has only been one single match where we have not scored a
goal and that was Chelsea away so no, we are definitely losing more points
from defence than
from lack of attack.
What would have been expected would have been a high energy,
goal threat, assist master, who thrives off pressure, but what arsenal have been accustom to over the past years
from Ozil are, breaks under pressure,
lack energetic drives, not much
of a
goal threat and slow down plays constantly.
The club are
lacking a dynamic winger who will provide quality support to French duo Alexandre Lacazette and Olivier Giroud, as signing a conventional winger will almost certainly bring more creativity and
goals to an Arsenal team that
lack both
of those qualities
from time to time.
the analysis
from barton is unreasonable and immature.messi scored
from open play bcos he has suarez and neymar to support them who are as talented and EXPERIENCED.while chamberlain and some players do nt hav that experience or
lacks form right now.the player chamberlain wa when he was signed, scoring spectacular
goals and giving nice crosses, but now his form has been - do nt know wheter its bcos
of low motivation levels or
lack of confidence.so if sanchez had players as good as himself to support him in attack, then u will see that hes not far or i may even claim he is on same level asmsn..
With
goals still dried up at the other end
of the pitch (though Aaron Ramsey would want to blame
lack of technology for the «no -
goal - show» against Liverpool), Wenger will require much more
from his back four.
Despite the
lack of goals it was a fantastic and dominant half
of football
from the lads.
this season was supposed to be about the epl not fourth place.just seeing how empty the Emirates was yesterday I expect it to be even worse in the upcoming games.wenger blew it in the transfer market, I think that in itself shows how we
lacked ambition and we settled for a top four
from the beginning and if by a chance we managed to win epl then thats it.lossing some games, crucial points and the feedback we got back was just covering the real
goals of the club top four.soton home (a team challenging has to win this game), Crystal palace, swansea, just add those points and see where we could and should hve been.everyone here is a die hard arsenal fan whether an akb or aob but fact remains we love the club, we want the club to move forward, we want the club to be a superhouse, its got nothing to do with wengers last year or his last chance
of epl.this sort
of thinking is running our beloved club to the ground.whether u like it or not a change is needed and a serious one.at the moment we hve so many bogey teams do u think arsene will beat them nxt season!!!
The Arsenal team that Arsene Wenger picked for the match at Anfield yesterday were absolutely awful in the first half and were extremely lucky to be only 2
goals down at the break, but although some players have complained that they just weren't ready, Wenger believes that the slow start was because they didn't play a game last week, and suffered
from «a
lack of competition».
if it isn't broken don't fix it and forget the
goals, Ox still has parts
of his game he needs to work on like being consistent during games (Reading game shows he still
lacks this) also knowing how to give a simple accurate pass, against Ludogorets he couldn't make his pass to Walcott accurate even when both were close to the 8yard box n barely 5yards
from one another.
the season is over i don't feel that arsenal need any more frustrations along the way, as it stands injuries and fitness are things players and manager must look after.The mesut ozil injury was
lack of proper communication and Wenger saw Ramsey wanting to be subbed but still did not care to look at him, arsenal have been bad lucked this term and this match after losing to team conceded
from offside position
from the first
goal.
We had equalised after his mistake, after that the
lack of professionalism
from the restart
from the whole team resulted in a third
goal being conceded.
As said, if we get a new manager then that manager will have the same issues to deal with as Wenger has had,
lack of support
from board and pri
goal of profit over titles.
Even though I thought that the way Norwich had set up and the
lack of width
from our so - called wide players was not helping him, I thought it was sure to be Giroud to get the hook, especially with his confidence at rock bottom after his longest
goal drought since joining the Gunners.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly
from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball...
from our backs out wide, we've seen pace
from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored
goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much,
lack the necessary first - touch and / or
lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's
lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
2
of the
goals came directly
from a total
lack of danger sniffing.
The Gunners were criticised for
lacking «cojones» recently when Watford came
from behind to steal all three points a couple
of weeks ago, but we have since enjoyed our own reversals, coming
from a
goal down to win in each
of our last three games.