Sentences with phrase «lack of money means»

Lack of money means lack of games, so I'm going to pick only interesting ones like Bayonetta 2, Rayman Legends, AC4 and other ones.

But lack of money means it will take three years to complete.

In a less harsh, but similarly ending, approach Catsimatidis suggested that Lhota's lack of money means an inability to win in November and that Lhota should therefor step aside in favor of Catsimatidis.

In 1973 things were especially bad, as a lack of money meant it had to run its not - entirely - brilliant 721 and 731 again, and the team scored precisely zero points all season.

Not exact matches

Freelance work can allow them to get real world experience and earn some money until they land a full - time job, he said, although relying solely on that type of employment can also mean there's a lack of corporate identity — for the company as well as for the freelancers themselves.

This means that you will save money by not having to hire another analyst and that the analysis will be higher level due to the lack of human error.

And while the lack of regulation in this area may mean some people are going to lose a lot of money, the potential for major wins is great.

What was meant to be a new, decentralised form of money that lacked «systemically important institutions» and «too big to fail» has become something even worse: a system completely controlled by just a handful of people.

The lack of oversight means that no one is checking that the exchanges are properly securing their customers» money or that large players are not able to manipulate the price.

So, if a restaurant has been dealing with a lack of clientele, then it will be highly motivated to pursue whatever means it can to get customers into its seats, eating its food and spending money.

But without state backing and a means for circulating credit in the capitalist economy it lacks the nature of money and is destined to fail.

They exploit violence, as a means of attracting their audiences, to make up for a lack of time, skill, money or insight.

The author of this uninspired piece lacking in true research and zero enlightenment would do well to take a journey in solitude so he may hear the true word of God for himself, rather than an interpretation meant to please a mass audience who will feel obligated to part with their hard earned and hard to find money....

The lack of investment in the club and the drought of trophies also mean the club is also probably losing out on more money if they had invested in players

Spending doesn't mean ambition but lack of solutions to th same issues shows no ambition If you have recurring problems you either fix them internally or you have to sign players unfortunately they cost money.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's that bad a team who don't even play us on a regular basis know how to beat us — «sit back and hit them on the counter» — to a lack of spending, and I don't mean the rumoured # 200 million let's - go - crazy money... no.

This is going to be a problem for them over the next few seasons FFP means they can't spend ridiculous money anymore and there lack of home grown players means they have to waste some of there spend on players they might not Necessary want.

When I talk about money issues being a major issue in holding us back, I meant about our lack of willingness to pay for what we think we need, primarily because we think we can't afford it.

No lack of incentives for both sides then, which should hopefully mean an entertaining game beckons − though my money, and I think virtually everyone else's is, is on the home side putting on a show.

• Key quotes from the NAO report: o «The source of many problems has been the absence of a detailed view of how Universal Credit is meant to work» [page 33] o «The Department is unable to explain to us why it originally decided to aim for national roll - out from October 2013» [Para 3.7] o «In early 2013, it (DWP) did not have a convincing strategic plan in place» [3.35] o «It is unlikely that UC will be as simple or cheap to administer as originally intended» [15, summary] o «the Department has not achieved value for money... wider concerns about the Department's ability to deal with weak programme management, over-optimistic timescales and a lack of openness about progress.»

«The programme will ensure that all our children will be educated to secondary level, and money, or the lack of it, will no longer mean a denial of education.

The institute dropped the lawsuit after EPA attorneys argued that the group lacked legal standing to bring the litigation; the agency also pointed to a 1999 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that concluded that receipt of grant money didn't mean that advisory committee members were «susceptible to improper influence.»

While we found no impropriety, the lack of transparency means it is often impossible to be sure that money invested in carbon offsetting makes the difference that is claimed for it.

And free means matches can flake out on you at any given time because they don't have any money invested in the game, for lack of a better term.

The lack of resources means that everyone is chasing after money rather than personal fulfillment.

Over recent years, the lure of the nearby fish and chip shops and supermarkets offering pre-packaged, on - the - go snacks have tempted teenagers off - site, and a vicious circle has been created where lack of customers has meant less money for schools and caterers, leading to less meal choice and drab dining areas in need of a spruce, leading to — yes, you guessed it — more children taking their money elsewhere.

Lack of funding can lead to declining quality, caps on quantity, or both, and prioritizing free tuition for all means less money to help the neediest students with additional costs.

But the lack of money in the education system overall meant some schools that had expected to gain under the new funding formula would in fact lose, she said.

Rhee has repeatedly claimed that the problem facing American education is not a lack of money, despite the fact that in Connecticut, at least, the lack of sufficient resources means urban students face larger class sizes, fewer options and middle - income and working families end up paying unfairly high local property taxes.

The government hopes its national funding formula will address historic variations between different parts of the country, but a lack of additional money into the overall education pot means some schools will lose money, while others gain.

A lack of money was also a major challenge and, combined with being a woman meant it would have been near impossible for her to succeed.

In such conditions, when someone buys not a large number of books per year, he prefers to get something specific for his money (that is, a physical book), whereas when someone reads a lot like me, buying printed books loses meaning due to lack of storage space.

However, a lack of formal investments doesn't mean that these monies don't warrant earning interest too.

Note that a lack of collateral, credit history or the inability to secure a loan through a bank doesn't mean that no one will lend you the money.

Their severe lack of income - producing asset classes means you will probably be redeeming shares to get the money needed to pay for living expenses during retirement.

I mean, for instance, one thing that certainly characterized the period was lack of work, lack of money just to get the necessities of life.

So a lack of a pipeline means that oil companies are making less money than they would if a pipeline existed.

Residential energy audits are supposed to give homeowners a clear idea of how they can reduce energy use and save money, but a lack of guidelines and standards for auditors means their reports may instead be unpersuasive or difficult for homeowners to understand.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.

Sure, the Xperia XZ Premium is a much more aesthetically pleasing and characterful device, and is also overall a slightly faster one, what with the Snapdragon 835 running the show under the hood, but the ultra-high price - tag, coupled with the lack of the fingerprint scanner (at least in the U.S. market) means that the Mate 9 just represents much better value for your money in every way possible.

The phone is hamstrung by the lack of RAM, meaning day to day performance is sluggish and ultimately not worth the asking price when there are plenty of other devices for the same money that do the jobs they're supposed to.

However, the lack of privacy measures in Bitcoin also means that the criminals that have abducted Lerner can not easily spend the money or sell it for cash because the transaction can be traced using the public Bitcoin Blockchain.

An industry - wide lack of accountability and incentives to cut corners mean that tens of millions of workers may pay for these third - party errors with their jobs while employers waste money and miss out on hiring qualified employees.

It means an individual's behavioral intention will be lower if he or her just has little control over performing a specific behavior due to lacking of some resource, such as time or money, regardless of the fact that he or her may have the positive attitude or subjective norm about the intended behavior.