The Maunder Minimum was also characterised by an almost
total lack of sunspots, which record how the solar dynamo, which creates the sun's magnetic field, is churning.
Anomolous global sea ice area would seem to be over a million square kilometers below the 1979 - 2000 mean... hmmm and
continuing lack of sunspots should mean lower global temperatures... hmmm
But sunspots were recorded by several astronomers, and Rottman and others believe there is a correlation between the climate of the time and
the lack of sunspots.
He conveniently forgot the «Maunder Minimum aka Little Ice Age that bottomed out around 1300 that has been attributed to
lack of sunspots (inactive sun) This egregious straightening of the handle of the hockey stick graph is just one of the more obvious embarassments to AGW policy presented by the entire graph of the Holocene interglacial period.
Since it occurred immediately after the invention of the telescope, astronomers had no idea that
the lack of sunspots were unusual and did not give it much attention.
The downward trend reflects
the lack of sunspot activity.
Some attribute the trend to
a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents.»
I'm an amateur astronomer and have noted
the lack of sunspot activity recently, a phenomenon associated with reduced solar heat output.
You can't make a one - to - one connection between
a lack of sunspots and an oncoming ice age.
Dramatic evidence of a strong linkage was provided by another astronomer, Walter Maunder, who at the age of 70, in 1922, linked
the lack of sunspots between 1645 and 1715, to the bitter cold of that period.
But then, just when things were humming nicely and the billions were flowing in, along came some scientists, skeptics and sunspots — or more precisely,
the lack of sunspots — to upset their apocalypse cart.