Sentences with phrase «lag between»

That's important because you don't want any lag between the movements you make and the ones that appear on - screen, or to wait for your phone to okay your latest shopping spree: facial recognition is incredibly useful but it has to work incredibly quickly.

The Bluetooth keyboard connects almost instantly so there's no annoying lag between when you fire up the PC and when you can get to work.

It's actually downright frustrating with its focusing difficulties and the considerable lag between the moment you trigger the onscreen shutter button and the final result.

It takes a finite amount of time for the pixels in a monitor to change from color to color, and the lag between those changes is called the «response time.»

Indeed, had she instead chosen to do nothing, this would have been reasonable given that her concerns were impressionistic and there was no reason to fear imminent violence, given the time lag between the incidents.

As a result, the vast majority of the lag between grant of review and final decision in California falls between grant and argument, rather than argument and decision.

And the lag between the time I asked for «registration details» and the time my university's ferocious spam filter lets me actually have them can be a couple of days, by which time I've likely forgotten where I live, let alone the names of startups I've dated.

Part of the issue, according to Scott and others, is that there is a five - to 10 - year lag between putting diversity policies in place and seeing actual results.

As a Virtual Assistant who is a paralegal targeting lawyers, I agree entirely with your assessment of the lag between current technology and lawyers today.

Apart from the obvious challenges of scaling and the lag between regulation and technology, probably the biggest problem is awareness.

Another factor complicating how to judge the relationship between economic growth and personal injury litigation is the lag between the injury, itself, and when lawyers become involved.

On Apollo 13 there was likely little lag between the alarm and the recognition that something was wrong, probably very seriously wrong.

The time - lag between changes in temperature and consequent changes in CO2 concentration are caused by outgassing of CO2 from the oceans when they warm and uptake by the oceans as they cool.

At fixed time for energy breakeven (and you need to factor in a time lag between when the energy is spent and when the renewable resource is actually producing), you find you can exponentially grow the renewables.

If you followed Jim Flannery's book, The Weather Makers, there is a 30 to 40 - year lag between the emission of heat trapping gases and the behavior of the system that we see cropping up in weather headlines around the planet.

Like I said earlier, the problem is that the lag between emissions and effect is so long, that it occupies half an average lifespan, and people dismiss it or aren't worried about it since they are more worried about immediate survival.

There's a 20 - 30 year lag between CO2 emissions and warming CO2 emissions rose rapidly since 2000, and that heating effect has not yet been felt.

(sorry — don't know the official term); if there was a lag between hauling and measuring, was that accounted for?

The 800 - year lag between the beginnings of temperature increase and CO2 rise in the polar ice record is because the initial warming that provoked the end of the ice ages was caused by changes in the Earth's alignment and orbit around the sun; not anthropogenic CO2.

This ratio is a proxy for local summer insolation5, and thus allows the chronology to be constructed by orbital tuning without the need to assume a lag between a climate record and an orbital parameter.

The temperature lag between atmosphere and water in the upper few meters of the ocean is on the order of a few days.

Though Agassi expects other car makers to join the project, that may mean a big lag between the first 100 and the first 10,000 EVs on Danish roads.

I haven't read your entire blog, but I bet I wouldn't find an article which denounces the fact that Al Gore forgot to mention and adequately explain the time lag between temperature and CO2 concentration.

There is an infinite time lag between presentation of facts / evidence and trolls acceptance of same.

There is relatively little lag between the atmosphere SST, as it is in more direct contact with the atmosphere.

Holy cow I just found the earlier post: «The lag between temperature and CO2.

And our understanding is further complicated by the lag between slow - building environmental phenomena and when we finally become aware of them.

Though it is a lot nearer than it appears here this would seem to be a key factor in determining any lag between the two.

The study focuses on the lag between rising temperatures and how quickly glaciers adjust.

(h / t to Dr. Leif Svalgaard) Researchers find 200 - year lag between climate events in Greenland, Antarctica CORVALLIS, Ore. — A new study using evidence from a highly detailed ice core from...

There is a lag between near altitude stations and sealevel stations, visible in the seasonal cycle and the trend.

I've understood that he also predicted the ~ 1000 year time lag between temperature rise and CO2 at the end of a glacial period, before it was observed in the ice cores thanks to better dating techniques.

«According to the most recent data, increased growth rates have persisted far into 2016, consistent with the expected lag between CO2 growth and the El Niño / Southern Oscillation index.

But new research has shown evidence of a 200 - year lag between climate events in Greenland and Antarctica during the last ice age, and it could possibly help shed light on the consequences of climate change in the future.

This 800 year lag between temperature and co2 rise only happens as a «trigger» to end the last ice age, due to orbital forcing.

And considering the long lag between actions that commit the planet to the long - term impacts of climatic change, assessments also need to pay more attention to the potentially dramatic consequences of actions taken (or postponed) today.

Interestingly enough the same lag between temperature and CO2 is readily apparent in modern satellite data.

the means table confirms that there is a bit of lag between maxima and means but even with means I can make parabolic fit with 95 % confidence.

This would maybe explain the long lag between cause (shifting disposition of gravitational bodies), and effect (shifting currents of sub-surface matter).

Remember that there is a variable lag between the initial solar effect of warming or cooling on the Pacific Ocean and that effect then working through all the other oceanic oscillations so it is difficult to establish the overall balance of the oceanic oscillations at any given time.

This figure indicates 3 things: (1) the time lag between emitting greenhouse gases and when we see the principle effect is about 30 years, due mostly to the time required to heat the oceans, (2) the rate of temperature increase predicted by a climate sensitivity of 3 °C tracks well with the observed rate of temperature increase, and (3) we have already locked in more than 1.5 °C warming.

No matter where the heat comes from, there will be a lag between the time you apply the heat, and the time at which you see the water heat up to a certain level, as indicated by the thermometer.

The time lag of 20, 30, or more years includes many more complex physics, as you point out, but the salient point is that there is a decadal - scale time lag between what we do and when when see the effect, and for my intented audience, that is already news.

«If precipitation exceeds melting the glacier advances: if melting exceeds precipitation the glacier recedes, but there will be a time lag between cause and effect.

Conclusions from the physical sciences, such as the rapidity with which emissions must be reduced to avoid obviously unacceptable consequences and the long lag between emissions and consequences, lead to implications in social sciences, including economics, law and ethics.

Ocean energy transfers to the atmosphere and space via the surface with about a 1 year lag between SST and GAT i.e. the ocean is a leading indicator of atm temperature in any timeframe.

Considering that Wyatt, et al estimate that it takes over 60 years for NINO 3.4 to flip, the response lag between solar minimum and temperature response is worthy of investigation.

In this analysis I assumed a 4 - month lag between changes in ENSO and changes in global surface temperature, consistent with the results in Foster & Rahmstorf (2011).

But given the time constants for heating (or cooling) the oceans, there's at least a half - century time lag between a large change in forcing and a final temperature equilibrium.

There is of nevertheless a time lag between the increase or decrease in energy flow from the oceans and the ability of the atmosphere to restore the equilibrium.