Not exact matches
In his Address to the Nobility of the German Nation (1520), Luther criticized the traditional
distinction between the «temporal» and «spiritual» orders — the
laity and the clergy — arguing that all who belong to Christ through faith, baptism, and the Gospel shared in the priesthood of Jesus Christ and belonged «truly to the spiritual estate»: «For whoever comes out of the water of baptism can boast that he is already a consecrated priest, bishop, and pope, although of course it is not seemly that just anybody shall exercise such office.»
A «Catholic peace tradition» was described which blurred or erased the historical (and doctrinal)
distinction between the «higher» morality of the religious and the «lower» morality of the
laity.
This arrangement implies a qualitative
distinction between clergy and
laity.
In time the
laity may not care to observe the
distinction between the new Christ - bearers and ordained priests, despite the Vatican's «infallible» teaching that the former are forever excluded from the ranks of the latter.
Since the majority of the Conservative
laity are indifferent to matters of religious ideology and Jewish observance, the
distinctions between Conservative and Reform Judaism have become increasingly irrelevant.
The institution of a separate hierarchical priesthood was thereby overcome in principle and together with it the
distinction between the clergy; and the
laity, between rectores and subditi (rectors and subjects).