Sentences with phrase «lambda feedback»

Absolutely, but the fuel management system ought to be able to compensate for this during closed - loop operation via lambda feedback and fuel trims.
Unmetered air or insufficient fuel delivery + lack of lambda feedback would totally explain this.
This leads me to believe that there is another issue present, something like unmetered air or partially - clogged injectors which the fuel management can not accommodate for due to the absence of lambda feedback.

Not exact matches

By using via feedback from the lambda sensors, the fuel management can determine the level of deviation in AFR.
open - loop mode, which runs without lambda sensor feedback.
«The sensitivity of this model to an increase in lambda of 0.02 (which gives a 4 W / m2 forcing) is 1.19 deg C (assuming no feedbacks on lambda or a).
likewise, lambda must be 0.231 for clouds and 0.091 for ice / albedo feedback, using Hansen's figures.
There are papers were they make maps of «the local feedback parameter lambda (W m ^ -2 K ^ -11)».
He uses lambda (λ) as a feedback parameter, which is very peculiar considering that a physicist would reserve this for denoting wavelength of radiation.
That is equivalent to an almost uniform prior were instead 1 / S, the climate feedback parameter (lambda), to be estimated.
We have defined things here such that $ \ lambda > 0 $ for a positive feedback, $ \ lambda < 0 $ for a negative feedback.
Let's reserve the symbol $ \ lambda $ to mean the overall or net climate feedback, and use subscripts to denote specific feedback processes.
The λ (lambda) in S&H (2005) have the untis of thermal conductance per unit area, and are referred to as feedbacks.
I don't know precisely what Wyant's values for other feedbacks are, but he explicitly gives us his sensitivity parameter: lambda = 0.41 K / Wm -2, which gives us a climate sensitivity of 1.5 K. And anyway, in later papers, Wyant argues that SPs grossly exaggerate the negative cloud feedback.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z