I would assume that a small increase in pressure available to the injectors wouldn't cause a problem because the ECU is checking
lambda so will adjust injector time to compensate.
Not exact matches
His unexpected journey to the Googleplex started three months ago, split seconds after he Googled «python
lambda function list comprehension,» or
so he says.
So he invented a fudge factor, called
lambda, that could function mathematically to hold the universe at a standstill.
The researchers will now carry out further work to understand the fundamental mechanisms that make the interferon
lambda genes
so important for our ability to combat hepatitis caused by HCV.
So he added a term that came to be called the cosmological constant, symbolized by the Greek letter
lambda.
So with that kind of success, it's not surprising to see GM push the
Lambdas a little further with the 2012 GMC Acadia Denali.
If the front
lambda is sensing rich, I would expect the AFR to be leaner than reality,
so I would expect fuel economy to be slightly better.
and
lambda is 0.99 where 0.97 - 1.03 are the range, means the fuel mix is a bit fat but not
so bad.
Expansion tank was also cracked,
lambda - sensor being burnt into its socket, and thermostat got killed again as well (
so replaced it one more time).
I measured with an infrared thermometer and got 750F on the surface of the exhaust pipe near the
lambda,
so I assume it must have gotten up to temp inside the pipe.
The thing that surprises me is the very low voltage signal, because the engine coolant temperature shows that the engine is quite warm (which it should be after 9 minutes of running at 4000 RPM),
so regardless of the O2 heater malfunction that
lambda sensor should be hot and triggering the ECU to run in closed loop (which it clearly isn't).
So just to be sure it wasn't a wiring or ecu problem so I decided to test the lambda sensor directly with a multimete
So just to be sure it wasn't a wiring or ecu problem
so I decided to test the lambda sensor directly with a multimete
so I decided to test the
lambda sensor directly with a multimeter.
They do
so by measuring «
lambda», the ratio of actual AFR to stoich.
So the emissions analyzer is reporting the CO &
lambda values with some systematic error.
As can be seen above and in full below, it's decorated only with the series» trademark
lambda sigil, the text «Freeman June 14th,» and what appears to be a faint imprint of the G - Man, clearly pointing towards that «surprise» Valve set the stage for
so very nicely just a few days ago.
Theta is assumed to be a random quantity sampled from a prior distribution (a lot of people talk of theta and it as a prior, but we need to delve a little deeper) which is: pi (theta»
lambda), where
lambda is a vector of
so called hyperparameters.
This is how I got
lambda (1.2 - 0.3 divided by 0.6) W / m2 / K,
so the sensitivity to CO2 doubling is about 2.5 C for 3.7 W / m2.
This was my mental equation dF = dH / dt +
lambda * dT where dF is the forcing change over a given period (1955 - 2010), dH / dt is the rate of change of ocean heat content, and dT is the surface temperature change in the same period, with
lambda being the equilibrium sensitivity parameter,
so the last term is the Planck response to balance the forcing in the absence of ocean storage changes.
So can the Warmists graph
lambda for us as a function of temperature?
I've shown in The Cold Equations that their claimed mathematical derivation of the standard equation, ∆ T =
lambda ∆ F, is based on bad math...
so break out the rest of your math
so we can see whether it's as bad as what has been revealed.
If you fing the «w» as in
lambda w a bit of a puzzle,
so do I.