Sentences with phrase «land at the poles»

Having land at the poles must have a huge impact.

But since there was no land at any pole there was also no glaciation.

Crowley (forget reference) did a model in, oh, the mid-1990s where he was able to model massive glaciation in the Ordivician with lower solar output, land at the poles, and 12x current CO2 concentrations.

Not exact matches

Now Chelsea are in pole position to land Oxlade - Chamberlain this month, whilst they also look at moves for Virgil van Dijk, Fernando Llorente and a left - back.

Everton continue to be linked with a swoop for Arsenal midfielder Jack Wilshere, with the Daily Star claiming the Blues are in «pole position» to land the England international if he leaves the Emirates Stadium at the end of his contract in the summer.

Multiple observations indicate that the flowing water responsible for shaping and moving the rounded pebbles encountered in the vicinity of the rover landing area has long since been lost to space, though some of it may still exist deep below the surface of the planet at equatorial locations (water ice is known to exist near the surface at the poles).

The North Pole and Its Seekers October 28, 1868 New Expeditions to the Arctic Regions June 24, 1871 The Latest Arctic Explorations — The Remarkable Escape of the Polaris Party June 7, 1873 Rescue of the Remaining Survivors of the Polaris October 4, 1873 The Latest Polar Expedition December 26, 1874 Work for Arctic Explorers July 17, 1875 The British Arctic Expedition The Coming Arctic Expeditions May 22, 1875 The British Arctic Expedition August 28, 1975 July 3, 1876 The Search for the Pole The British Arctic Expedition December 23 and 30, 1876 The Recent Arctic Expedition January 20, 1877 Another Approach: Balloons and Airships Some Suggestions for Future Polar Expeditions February 13, 1877 Proposed New British Polar Expedition September 20, 1879 To the North Pole by Balloon July 13, 1895 Wellman's Airship for His North Polar Expedition By the Paris Correspondent of the Scientific American July 7, 1906 The Wellman Polar Airship Expedition By the Paris Correspondent of the Scientific American June 22, 1907 Farther North The American Arctic Expedition September 14, 1878 The Peary Arctic Expedition July 15, 1893 Nansen's Polar Expedition March 14, 1896 The Recent Failures of Arctic Expeditions August 29, 1896 The Return of Lieut. Peary September 27, 1902 The Polar Regions June 11, 1904 Peary's New Ship for Work in Arctic Seas October 8, 1904 Peary and the North Pole July 15, 1905 Peary's Arctic Ship, The «Roosevelt» July 15, 1905 Peary's «Farthest North» November 17, 1906 Race to the Finish: Peary and Cook Peary's Quest of the North Pole July 18, 1908 Peary and the North Pole August 21, 1909 Dr. Cook and the North Pole September 11, 1909 Dr. Cook's Discovery of the North Pole September 11, 1909 Honor to Whom Honor is Due September 18, 1909 Commander Peary's Discovery of the North Pole September 18, 1909 Retrospect of the Year 1909: Exploration January 1, 1910 «Investigating» Peary April 22, 1911 THE SOUTH POLE Exploring Antarctica Antarctic Exploration January 23, 1897 To South Polar Lands February 13, 1897 The Voyage of the «Discovery» February 3, 1906 Antarctic Expeditions, Past and Present Some Heroes of Exploration November 11, 1911 Dr. Charcot's Antarctic Expedition November 30, 1907 Motoring Toward the Pole By Motor Car to the South Pole By J. S. Dunnet October 19, 1907 The Shackleton Antarctic Expedition By John Plummer August 29, 1908 Lieut. Shackleton's Antarctic Expedition April 3, 1909 Lieut. Shackleton April 9, 1910 Two Novel Motor Sleds By Walter Langford May 14, 1910 Race to the Finish: Amundsen and Scott The Antarctic Expeditions January 13, 1912 The Discovery of the South Pole March 16, 1912 Amundsen's Attainment of the South Pole Progress of Antarctic Exploration By G. W. Littlehales, Hydrographic Office, United States Navy March 23, 1912 Capt. Scott at the South Pole April 13, 1912 Shadows at the South Pole June 15, 1912 The Scott Expedition and its Tragic End A Sacrifice Made for Scientific Ideals February 22, 1913 Achievements and Lessons of the Scott Expedition March 1, 1913 To the South Pole with the Cinematograph Film Records of Scott's Ill - Fated Expedition June 21, 1913 Science in the Heroic Age The Height of the Antarctic Continent By Walter Langford June 4, 1910 The Renewed Siege of the Antarctic January 17, 1914 Shackleton's South Polar Expedition The Value of His Scientific Observations By Henryk Arctowski June 17, 1916 Thawing Scott's Legacy A pioneer in atmosphere ozone studies, Susan Solomon rewrites the history of a fatal polar expedition By Sarah Simpson December 2001 Greater Glory In the race to the South Pole, explorer Robert F. Scott refused to sacrifice his ambitious science agenda By Edward J. Larson June 2011

The moon might have more water deposited by icy comets landing in cold, permanently shadowed craters at the south pole.

These twins in space can measure changes of gravity in land, sub-surface waters, and ice at the poles.

Utilizing poling skiffs and local guides, you can get to the most productive Belize fishing areas at the most productive times to help you land the fish of a lifetime or even that sought after Grand Slam.

Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit shifted 417,000 copies in November in the US, latest NPD figures show, landing the Criterion title at # 7 on the software totem pole for the month.

I made temperature plots from the reanalysis 2 (NCEP / DOE) data for the North Pole (actually a zonal mean at 88.5 ° N; there's no grid point at the pole) and for the zonal means at 85 ° N, 81 ° N and 75 ° N (excluding land and the last also excluding the always ice - free parts of the Atlantic).

Re # 173 (Dan Allan): Large - scale reasons for the chaos include planetary tilt (= seasons), a high rate of rotation (= major Coriolis effect), much more solar heat applied at the equator than at the poles, unevenly distributed land, air and water, a molten core resulting in tectonic activity including continental drift and volcanos, the occasional hammer from space, a really large satellite creating major tides in addition to minor ones from the sun, plus some stuff I'm probably forgetting.

E.M. Smith: (16:23:55): From this I would assert that the hysteresis balance of the system is driven by land / ice at the poles, not by the nature of water.

The measurements at MLO, Barrow, Samoa, south pole represent 95 % of the atmosphere, where only seasonal variations and a continuous increase are seen, not (or limited) the influence of local / regional biological decay or uptake, car exhausts or chimneys as in 5 % of the atmosphere over land where such variations are measured for other reasons than a global CO2 level...

My science challenge was — prove that visible light from the Sun can heat the land and water at the equator to the intensity these are heated which gives us our huge equator to poles winds and dramatic weather systems.

Prove that visible light from the Sun heats the land and water at the equator to the intensity it does which gives us our HUGE equator to poles winds and DRAMATIC weather systems.

But first, I am challenging the AGWSF energy budget, not your idiosyncratic version, and if you are defending the AGWSF Greenhouse Effect then prove that visible light from the Sun heats matter of land and water at the equator to the intensity these are heated which gives us our huge equator to poles winds and dramatic weather systems, which is what the AGWSF Greenhouse Effect claims..

Since the whole world does not appear to freeze during a ice age, the must be massive ice making going at the pole driven by heat lifting oceans of water to the sky from the equator where it is pushed by the expanding air and vapor to the poles areas where it returns to the surface and follows cold land like a culvert between warmer expanding ocean air back down to the equatoral region.

And in the real world this is exactly what does heat up the land and water at the equator to give us our huge equator to poles wind system and our dramatic convected weather, our storms, our monsoons, our water cycle.

This is what actually heats land and water at the equator to give us our huge wind systems from equator to poles and dramatic weather.

Prove visible light from the Sun is capable of heating the land and water at the equator intensely which is what it actually takes to get our huge winds from equator to poles and all our dramatic weather systems..

I am not interested in what you «think» might be happening, I'm asking you to return with proper scientific proof that visible light from the Sun physically heats the land and water at the equator to the great intensity these are actually being heated which is what gives us our HUGE equator to poles winds and DRAMATIC weather systems, in the real world.

We don't have visible light saunas, we have thermal infrared saunas; we don't have visible light heaters to heat our homes, we have thermal infrared heaters heating matter directly, just as the real thermal infrared direct from the Sun heats the matter on the Earth's surface directly; heats water of the oceans, heats the land, heats it so intensely at the equator that it gives us our HUGE and dramatic WINDS flowing from the equator to the poles and back again.

Unless you can show how visible light from the Sun actually physically heats land and water at the equator to the intensity it is heated in the real world which gives us our great equator to poles winds and our dramatic weather systems, then you have to admit that your AGWScienceFiction fisics is stupid.

Most predictions I've seen show a net warming at the poles after all it is the antarctic land based ice which will eventually flood the earth.

If you can not show that visible light direct from the Sun can heat land and water at the equator to the intensity it is heated which gives us our huge winds from equator to poles and all our dramatic weather systems, then YOU HAVE NO WIND OR WEATHER IN YOUR WORLD.

Because unless you can show that visible light from the Sun directly heats land and water at the equator to the intensity it is actually heated in the real world which produces our huge wind system from the equator to the poles and all our real dramatic weather systems, then you have no wind or weather in your AGW Greenhouse Effect world.

Earth's climate has varied widely over its history, from ice ages characterised by large ice sheets covering many land areas, to warm periods with no ice at the poles.

Land and sea based ice at both poles have melted, and have contributed to global sea level rise.

(As above, so below — the ocean also gets heated at the equator and flows toward the poles, add Earth's spin and land masses.

NASA's Operation IceBridge is a six - year mission to survey land and sea ice at the poles.

This atmospheric CO2 concentration (1400 ppm) is said to yield a warming of 16 °C globally, 20 °C over land, and 30 °C at the poles by 2130.

Dr. James Hansen: «This atmospheric CO2 concentration (1400 ppm) is said to yield a warming of 16 °C globally, 20 °C over land, and 30 °C at the poles by 2130.»

In general there is more warming over land than the oceans and more warming at the poles than in the tropics.

In this warming world there is no reason to believe that ice over land must decrease if ice in water at the other pole melts.

HadCRUT has large areas of missing data over the poles and a less complete land analysis than ocean analysis at lower latitudes.

But I also thought this was about tropical - polar ocean circulation and whether or not there was a continental land mass located at a pole.

During that time the thermometer series measure the narrow belt of warming at the sea and land surface, but the satellites do not see it until atmospheric circulation starts moving it toward the poles.

Depending on how the continents are arranged the global ocean conveyor belt changes and having a land mass over a pole blocks warm water from getting at the ice to melt it.

There are alternate explanations: most of the land mass was at the poles, and solar output then was lower than now.