On the contrary it is the visible force and migration laws of the superpowers that keep
the land hungry persons from the empty space of the world occupied in the days of colonial expansion.
Not exact matches
They conveniently dichotomize all
land - use decisions as
people versus scenery or
hungry workers versus idle back - packers.
It is the visible force and migration laws of the superpowers that keep the
land -
hungry people away from the empty spaces of the world which were occupied in the days of colonial expansion.
It is an excess in an age where almost a billion
people go
hungry, and represents a waste of the labour, water, energy,
land and other inputs that went into producing that food.
While Americans are far from going
hungry, we are actually using less and less of our farm
land and
people refuse to become farmers under this system, so I would argue the US is likely producing less food and especially the food
people want to eat than we would otherwise.
By displacing agriculture for food — and causing more
land clearing — biofuels are bad for
hungry people and the environment
At a time when the
land, water, and energy resources necessary to feed a global population of 6.9 billion are increasingly limited - and when at least 1 billion
people remain chronically
hungry - food losses mean a waste of those resources and a failure of our food system to meet the needs of the poor.
A large share of the world's 852 million
hungry people live on
land with soils worn thin by erosion.
And because some of the countries where
land is being acquired do not have enough
land to adequately feed their own
people, the stage is being set for future conflicts between the so - called
land grabbers and
hungry local
people.