The underlying assumption of the NSW Act is that almost complete dispossession of Indigenous people has already occurred in NSW and that the best legislative response is to compensate for this through its own
land rights scheme.
Not exact matches
The mine wars, the
schemes to deprive local Appalachians of the mineral
rights to their
lands (an injustice which has never been put
right), workplace injustice and the struggle to
right it are the constitutive violences of the coal and electric power industry.
The responsible entity should disclose how it secures the
rights of access or tenure to
land, licences and water needed to operate the agribusiness
scheme.
Also, by default, your control
scheme is set to «assisted» with regards to the physics — this means the game will try and auto
right you as you jump and
land.
The fact that we don't need to tie carbon
rights to
land rights is liberating in one sense — it makes it so that governments can think creatively about who ought to benefit from
schemes like Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) and REDD + and craft policies accordingly.
Looking forward, things to watch include: the impact of economic recovery on commodity prices and agricultural expansion for food and biofuels production; large - scale
land acquisition by foreign nations and corporations in tropical countries; climate negotiations and the REDD mechanism, including controversies over
land rights, «offsetting», forest definitions, and sustainable forest management; the emergence of payments for ecosystem services beyond REDD; the cap - and - trade versus carbon tax
schemes; efforts to address the demand side of deforestation — notably consumption; emerging certification systems for agricultural and forestry products (i.e. RSPO, Aliança da Terra, FSC, etc); and Brazil's progress in meeting its deforestation reduction targets.
http://www.government.nl/issues/energy/sustainable-energy «The European Commission last Friday approved a certification
scheme which would brand biofuels produced from palm oil as «sustainable», despite evidence that their production contributes to deforestation, peatland degradation, disputes over
land rights, and climate change.»
Before Indigenous people will let down their guard, developed countries, and the governments of developing countries which will be paid to keep their forests standing, need to do at least three things: 1) demonstrate clearly that they will recognize and respect Indigenous
land rights, 2) include Indigenous peoples in the
scheme governing use of standing forests, and 3) ensure that Indigenous people whose traditional territory is the forest benefit from the financial proceeds of REDD.
McDonald is assisting Ballymore with a major mixed - use town centre
scheme at Brentford Waterside, which includes advising on a CPO indemnity agreement,
land and
rights required in the CPO and related matters such as stopping up and planning variations.
The section 43A
scheme, which is part of that act, replaces the
right to negotiate over pastoral lease and other crown
land such as national parks with a much weaker consultation process.
Consequently, NSW now has its own native title
scheme in relation to low impact exploration for minerals and petroleum, (58) which replaces the
right to negotiate with a requirement that miners reach access arrangements with all
land holders (including registered native title claimants and holders) about the way in which exploration will proceed.
Following the Prime Minister's statement, Wadeye traditional owners issue a statement calling for a «public and private housing
scheme» without amending The Aboriginal
Land Rights Act (Northern Territory) 1976.
The
scheme, introduced under the Native Title (State Provisions) Act 1999 («NTSPA»), the Native Title (State Provisions) Regulations 2000 («NTSPR») and amendments to the
Land Administration Act 1997 («LAA»), would have reduced the procedural rights available to native title claimants over significant areas of land to a right to be notified, rights to make an objection and the right to consultations in good faith following an object
Land Administration Act 1997 («LAA»), would have reduced the procedural
rights available to native title claimants over significant areas of
land to a right to be notified, rights to make an objection and the right to consultations in good faith following an object
land to a
right to be notified,
rights to make an objection and the
right to consultations in good faith following an objection.
South Australia has two
schemes for the grant of
land rights to Aboriginal people.
This is particularly so where the allocation of
rights under the existing state
scheme is not based on traditional connection to
land but on the people's status as residents of a particular area or their historical connection to that area.
It is ironic then, that when Indigenous peoples have complained about the inadequacies of the NTA to protect Indigenous heritage, the response has been that heritage protection should be achieved through specifically targeted legislation, rather than through a comprehensive
land rights protection
scheme.
Or has the
scheme operated fairly to enable parties who have a real interest in the
land, and who would not have otherwise been able to participate, to have their
rights and interests represented?
The second
scheme is set out in two pieces of legislation, both of which deal with the management of a single large area of Aboriginal
land: the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act 1981 (SA) and the Maralinga Tjarutja Land Rights Act 1984 (
land: the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara
Land Rights Act 1981 (SA) and the Maralinga Tjarutja Land Rights Act 1984 (
Land Rights Act 1981 (SA) and the Maralinga Tjarutja
Land Rights Act 1984 (
Land Rights Act 1984 (SA).
Following the Prime Minister statement, Wadeye traditional owners issued a statement calling for a «public and private housing
scheme» without amending the Aboriginal
Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976.20
The validation of intermediate period acts deprives native title holders of procedural
rights to engage in decisions about
land, substituting a compensation
scheme for
rights removed.
This is particularly so where the allocation of
rights under the existing State
scheme is not based on traditional connection to
land but on the people's status as residents of a particular area or their historical connection to that area.