Each chapter is devoted to different international
landmark arbitration cases — primarily state - to - state but also including commercial disputes with geopolitical dimensions — and showcases how arbitration has resolved disputes in cases regarding for example potential escalation of armed conflict.
Not exact matches
Our work has included obtaining the recognition and enforcement of four AAA arbitral awards through proceedings conducted before and after the enactment of the Dominican commercial
arbitration law, which have become
landmark cases in the Dominican Republic.
Following our successful funding in the
landmark case of Essar v Norscot [2016] EWHC 2361 (Comm), we launched a range of specialist funding solutions designed to help parties in international
arbitration make the most of that
case's finding.
While deciding HRC Shipping
case, the learned court had drawn upon the reasoning used in the
landmark Indian
case, Bhatia International v Bulk Trading SA [3], where the Court held that the Act itself did not state that it would not apply if the place of
arbitration is not in Bangladesh or that it would apply only if the place of
arbitration is in Bangladesh.
Tom has appeared in many of the leading
cases in the DIFC Courts, including Pearl Petroleum v The Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq [2017] DIFC ARB 003 (US$ 2.1 bn
arbitration enforcement), Barclays Bank v EGFL [2016] DIFC CFI 036 (US$ 170m enforcement of New York judgment), Protiviti v Al - Mojil [2016] DIFC CA 003 (leading
case on forum non conveniens) and DNB Bank v Gulf Eyadah (
landmark case on «conduit» enforcement of foreign judgments).