Sentences with phrase «landmark ruling of the state»

The landmark ruling of the state's Energy Commission is expected to lower the monthly cost of home ownership by $ 40, but it will also have significant benefits for the local economy and the electric grid.

Not exact matches

New Yorkers for Students» Educational Rights, an education advocacy group, is suing Gov. Andrew Cuomo, the Board of Regents and state Education Commissioner John King, claiming the state has systematically shortgaged the public school system by failing failing to comply with an agreement that followed the landmark Campaign for Fiscal Equity Ruling of 2006.

After the landmark ethics overhaul enacted last year, the State Board of Elections has developed rules for the disclosure of spending by outside groups, but those that don't explicitly advocate for the election or defeat of a candidate are exempt from this requirement.

He also said «If there are extra resources in the state budget, we must remember that the State Court of Appeals ruled — in the landmark Campaign for Fiscal Equity decision several years ago - that the children of this city deserve billions more in educational resources, and now is the time to provide it.&rstate budget, we must remember that the State Court of Appeals ruled — in the landmark Campaign for Fiscal Equity decision several years ago - that the children of this city deserve billions more in educational resources, and now is the time to provide it.&rState Court of Appeals ruled — in the landmark Campaign for Fiscal Equity decision several years ago - that the children of this city deserve billions more in educational resources, and now is the time to provide it.»

As an example of one area where they've butted heads, he cited the state's refusal to increase education funding for the city after a landmark court ruling found the Big Apple has been consistently shortchanged.

That landmark ruling came courtesy of one incredible couple: Richard and Mildred Loving, who, in 1958, were banished from their home state of Virginia for violating the law that said two people of different couldn't marry.

Richard and Mildred Loving's marriage became the subject of a landmark ruling when, in 1967, the US supreme court ruled that the couple's arrest under state law that said that inter-racial couples couldn't marry was unconstitutional.

Nearly six years after Connecticut's landmark desegregation order, the group that initiated the lawsuit that led to the ruling is asking the courts to step in again — this time with a plan of its own that proposes how state leaders should carry out the mandate.

In 1954, the Supreme Court in its landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision ruled that separate school facilities based on race are inherently unequal and thus in violation of the 14th Amendment which states, in part: «No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.&states, in part: «No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.&States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»

While state teacher unions are spending time, energy and money fighting the landmark Vergara v. California ruling through appeal, one group of teachers in Los Angeles is helping shape what a post-Vergara world could look like.

Survey: Teachers support changes in state job protection laws The majority of public school teachers who participated in a new survey support changes in state teacher job protection laws that were the focus of last year's landmark ruling in Vergara v. California.

In Connecticut, the choice movement exploded after the landmark Sheff v. O'Neill ruling in 1996, in which the State Supreme Court ruled that the racial and socioeconomic segregation of Hartford's school children violated the Connecticut Constitution.

Forget the 1954 landmark Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education that ruled that segregation in schools violated the United States Constitution.

The landmark 1964 Supreme Court case outlined the rules of the game for newspapers, stating what they could print without being guilty of libel and subject to damages.

In their landmark unanimous (9 - 0) decision, the Court stated that «separate educational facilities are inherently unequal», and thus ruled segregation to be a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.

Just hours before, a U.S. judge also issued a landmark ruling in a climate change case brought by eight youth, ruling that State of Washington must reconsider the youth's proposed rule on carbon dioxide emissions.

Under the landmark new rule, Washington businesses such as power plants, petroleum refiners and manufacturers of metal and cement, which are collectively responsible for two - thirds of carbon pollution in the state, are required to cap and reduce emissions starting in 2017.

The landmark Electricity Act of 2003 instituted certain broad reforms, introduced elements of privatization, and created more consistent national rules governing the generation and transmission of power, but its provisions have been implemented spottily in some states and not at all in others.

Multinational companies targeting consumers in other EU member states may have to comply with data protection laws in each of those states, following a landmark European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling on data protection.

The future judgement in Joined Cases C -204-208 / 12 Essent Belgium N.V. v. Vlaamse Reguleringsinstantie voor de Elektriciteits - en Gasmarkt could very well be one of those landmark cases in which the CJEU clarifies one of the fundamental doctrinal issues in internal market law: can Member States rely upon the rule of reason to justify distinctly applicable measures?

Today, a landmark ruling of the European Court of Justice could signal the beginning of the end for around 200 investment agreements between EU Member States.

When the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller in June, striking down a ban on gun possession in D.C., a team at West went to work to get this landmark case loaded to Westlaw, complete with the insight and analysis that is critical to legal researchers.

Seven years before The Conversation was running in the theatres, the Supreme Court of the United States released its landmark ruling in Katz v United States, 389 US 347 (1967).

Investor - state arbitration clauses in investment treaties between EU Member States are incompatible with EU law, the European Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark judgment.

In the landmark ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Morin, [1992] 1 SCR 771 Justice John Sopinka, writing for the majority, stated at para. 62, that the two-fold purpose of Charter s. 11 (b) is to expedite trials and minimize prejudice.

This firm has the distinction of being the attorneys for the Plaintiff, in the precedent setting case, Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd, which was the landmark case in which the highest court of New York State established the rules relating to legal liability of landlords in New York City for exposing tenants to the hazards of lead - based paint

This firm has the distinction of being the attorneys for the Plaintiff, in the precedent setting case, Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd, which was the landmark case in which the highest court of New York State established the rules relating...

This landmark ruling paved the way for the birth of the life settlement industry in the United States.

This landmark ruling paved the way for the birth of the life settlement industry in the United States because the Court upheld a policy owner's right to assign his / her life insurance policy.

So ruled the Supreme Court of the State of New York in a landmark decision, known as the Nyack Case, in the 1990s.

So ruled the Supreme Court of the State of New York in a landmark decision, known as the Nyack Case,...