Not exact matches
I could say «you really shouldn't f-ing be insulting someone when your own
choice of
language appears s — t, doesn't that make you a f-ing hipocrite», or I could (and did) say lady «doth protest
too much», but the point stands equally strong regardless of my
language.
Although undoubtedly «the U.S. and U.K. are more popular
choices for Japanese scientists» it is very possible to improve your English in the southwest of Germany
too, as Tanaka notes: «In Europe, Germany is the second
choice after the U.K. [for Japanese researchers] as English is indeed the working
language in all international German labs.»
A final note: As is
too often the case, I was not able to see enough documentaries or foreign -
language films to feel comfortable second - guessing the Academy's
choices, so on those fronts you'll have to look elsewhere.
Delegates debated at length to find the clearest
language possible to explain that a claimed «15 - year hiatus» is based on a single variable (global mean surface temperature),
too short a period of observation for climatic significance, and sensitive to the
choice of the starting year from which a 15 - year period is calculated.
Unfortunately, blog commentary is taken far
too seriously by many participants and that the
choice of
language used is often inappropriate in a civilised discussion.
Ask another person to read it
too, as you may become accustomed to the
language and skip over a word
choice error.